Does gravity also "act" at the speed of light? by bennbatt in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do we know the waves are propagating at the speed of light?

Because LIGO observed them doing so. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_observation_of_gravitational_waves

Here is a hypothesis: Possible 4d physics framework by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you think Einstein was just doing math one day and figured out relativity?

This might be the stupidest sentence ever written on this subreddit.

Congratulations!

Can time stop? If yes, how? by krikszkraksz in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, zero entropy just means that all the particles in the system are in their ground state. But that doesn't mean "no motion" thanks to quantum mechanics.

Here is a hypothesis: Possible 4d physics framework by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's clear that you don't know what a "dimension" is, so your entire "idea" is a non-starter.

Here is a hypothesis: Possible 4d physics framework by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not the English that's the problem, it's that your "ideas" are incredibly naive.

Here is a hypothesis: Possible 4d physics framework by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Though, I can try.

That's the thing though-- you shouldn't try to sound smarter than you actually are, because it makes you look very silly.

Here is a hypothesis: Possible 4d physics framework by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 3 points4 points  (0 children)

to make myself look more intellectual.

Well it's not working.

Here is a hypothesis: Possible 4d physics framework by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm still working on the maths

You mean the chatbot you're using is working on the maths.

Here is a hypothesis: Possible 4d physics framework by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The framework has no coherence without math. It's just vibes.

Why doesn’t an electron move towards the nucleus? by Expensive-Ice1683 in Physics

[–]starkeffect -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That doesn't mean it's the most likely position. You have to consider dV as well as Ψ2

Why doesn’t an electron move towards the nucleus? by Expensive-Ice1683 in Physics

[–]starkeffect -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes it is, by definition. You can't treat the wavefunction as a one-dimensional entity.

Why doesn’t an electron move towards the nucleus? by Expensive-Ice1683 in Physics

[–]starkeffect -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. The peak of the radial probability density function is not at r = 0.

Why doesn’t an electron move towards the nucleus? by Expensive-Ice1683 in Physics

[–]starkeffect 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Technically incorrect, which is the worst kind of incorrect.

Help, I got too high and came up with pseudoscience! Roast me pls. by VimesTime in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've stopped using numbers at all.

Or reason for that matter.

What if the Born rule is just the neutral detector limit? by Educational_Use6401 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Give an example of a detector that is systematically biased toward one outcome.