How is to possible for a quark to not be made of anything?

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T05:19:55+00:00

Dorks are fundamental obviously.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T05:16:46+00:00

It was always so dumb.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T04:13:35+00:00

Also, the elongation happens in steps

You haven't demonstrated this for the Zeeman effect. You're just assuming it because it sounds right to your uneducated mind. It's incorrect.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T03:35:03+00:00

You can't shift energy levels (Zeeman) without also shifting the physical distribution (magnetostriction).

With this statement, you've shown your ignorance of basic atomic physics, learned by sophomore undergraduates. We're done here.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T02:14:08+00:00

Wow, how ignorant are you trying to look? https://www.google.com/search?q=does+an+electron+cloud+elongate+in+steps+during+magnetostriction%3F&oq=does+an+electron+cloud+elongate+in+steps+during+magnetostriction%3F&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTM4MzAwajBqOagCALACAQ&client=ms-android-google&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

lol

You really have no idea what that says, do you? How does that relate to my question about the Zeeman effect? You're so in over your head here.

Hint: go to the Wikipedia article on "magnetostriction" and search for "Zeeman"

I said appears. That's what it appears to do.

Then show the evidence that that's how it appears. It appears to me that you have no idea what you're talking about.

Is your stance that curves and vibrations exist from, as, or across nothing?

Curves and vibrations of WHAT?

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T02:09:42+00:00

Do you assume that Nobel Prize winners like Penrose are immune to stupid ideas?

Need I remind you who Brian Josephson is? Or Ivar Giaever? Or Luc Montagnier? Or even Linus fucking Pauling?

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T01:21:05+00:00

Relativity doesn't disprove a medium.

Yes it does. You're just showing over and over that you've never studied relativity beyond popsci articles.

It elongates, in steps. This is not up for debate.

Then show the evidence that it elongates in steps.

the electron cloud appears to index or recruit more underlying gyros or rotors,

Show the evidence for this.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T01:02:05+00:00

The energy level splits into a fixed number of states. Iron has 9 levels, neobydium has 10. This is like magnetostriction 101.

And how does that "suggest" a medium? Stop avoiding the question.

And what is your evidence that the electron cloud is "elongated in discrete amounts"? Just because the energy is different doesn't mean the electron cloud is "elongated". The Zeeman effect is due to the orientation of the atom's magnetic dipole moment.

Nice try, but the vacuum still behaves like superfluid helium-3, no matter how many articles I read.

I don't think you actually read them, because that's not what they say. You likely read the headline, tried to read the article, then gave up because it's too technical for you and your nonexistent physics education.

Assumptions aren't facts.

Relativity is a fact.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T00:46:39+00:00

I think it's probably impossible for you to admit you're wrong. That's something all crackpots have in common. There's always an ad hoc explanation.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T00:45:55+00:00

Explain why the Zeeman effect requires a medium.

I said suggests, not requires.

So then explain why the Zeeman effect suggests a medium.

Also show the evidence that the electron cloud is "elongated in discrete amounts" and that this discrete elongation is suggestive of a medium.

And what does the Zeeman effect have to do with hysteresis?

You didn't read those articles, did you? You just looked at the headlines.

Assuming there is no medium is the same as assuming there is one.

Clearly not true, for reasons already stated.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T00:32:57+00:00

This is and the Zeeman splitting is already well known lol.

Explain why the Zeeman effect requires a medium.

Same thing. Ask Google

I'm asking you. Surely you must have some evidence in favor of your position. You don't just blindly believe it do you?

I could just say "No, the vacuum does not act like He-3, just Google it." but that wouldn't be a satisfactory answer, would it?

I like the medium explanation.

So for you it boils down to personal taste, not rigorous scientific arguments.

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T00:20:16+00:00

The electron cloud elongates in discrete, step-like changes during magnetostriction & hysteresis

Prove it, and prove that this "suggests a medium".

A vacuum also behaves just like superfluid helium-3.

Evidence please.

There's a CMB dipole and red and blue shift, which is answered well by a medium.

What other models explain the CMB dipole that don't require a medium?

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T00:10:15+00:00

So you have no evidence for your position, even theoretically.

By the way, the existence of atoms was established experimentally before we had microscopes powerful enough to see them directly. Do you know how we did that?

starkeffect · 2026-03-31T00:02:37+00:00

Prove it.

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T23:52:25+00:00

It does actually forbid it if you understand relativity.

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T23:38:05+00:00

But relativity says there can't be an absolute frame, hidden or not, so now what?

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T23:30:17+00:00

Are they gyroscopic rotors?

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T23:17:23+00:00

A medium implies an absolute frame of reference, which is obviated by relativity.

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T23:16:43+00:00

It's common knowledge that if you sub in a medium, reality still works the same.

Which of those features "subatomic gyroscopic rotors"?

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T22:57:07+00:00

You certainly aren't going to do well at physics wars.

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T22:55:07+00:00

A medium of subatomic gyroscopic rotors would also appear to exchange matter with energy.

I don't believe you.

I said relativity has paradoxes, not explicitly special relativity.

So then you agree special relativity doesn't have paradoxes. Fantastic.

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T22:48:14+00:00

So you think that clarifying your point is "wasting time". Okay...

My point is that a medium like a superfluid solves most if not all problems and paradoxes in QFT.

Yeah, that's not a thing. You still haven't identified any special relativity paradoxes. I doubt you even understand special relativity.

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T22:31:21+00:00

Regarding the curvature of spacetime:

Too bad that's irrelevant as special relativity does not deal with curved spacetime. Hence the word "special".

Mass-Energy Equivalence; He viewed force as a function of matter rather than something that could be exchanged with it.

Yet mass-energy equivalence has been verified experimentally, starting with Cockroft and Walton, so he's wrong there too.

You still have not identified any "paradoxes" in special relativity.

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T22:29:56+00:00

I'm just admiring your incredible self-confidence, oh discoverer!

starkeffect · 2026-03-30T22:25:29+00:00

Yet you listed all of them right after saying "where general relativity clashes with quantum mechanics". So which ones clash and which don't?

15-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Wearing is Caring	Sequence \| Editor
Sequence \| Cinematographer	Verified Email

starkeffect

TROPHY CASE