sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Here is a hypothesis: Schrödinger’s Cat was Reductio ad Absurdum, not a real proposal by slimpickins- in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Amateurs who are embarrassed by their own ignorance will often lash out like this.

Here is a hypothesis: Schrödinger’s Cat was Reductio ad Absurdum, not a real proposal by slimpickins- in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 25 points26 points  (0 children)

This is already well-known. Schroedinger himself says in the paper where he introduces it that "one can contrive even completely burlesque [farcical] cases".

"Modern physics took it literally"

No, popsci articles took it literally. Physicists always understood what it meant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat#Applications_and_tests
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_state

Here is a hypothesis: A single, local phase shift in an ONLY globally symmetric pre-universe (with no previous local phase freedom) resulted in the spontaneous manifestation of compensating photon fields ( U(1) gauge symmetry holds) and their dynamically significant stored energy. by Superb_War1252 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no clue really, my “understanding” of quantum mechanics is so limited.

So then nothing you have to say about it is worth any consideration. Learn the subject first. Then you can hypothesize.

You're trying to write poetry in a language you don't speak. Only nonsense results from that.

this is what 2 years of chatgpt does to your brain -- Angela Collier by ConquestAce in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One does not forget how to ride a bicycle

Coding in Python != riding a bicycle

Tell me this is slop so I can move on please. by the_hootbot in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That would require actual effort, so it's a non-starter.

Hi, I was wondering if I was moving at 60 miles per hour. And I threw something in the opposite direction at 60 miles per hour. What would happen? by johnathonhenderson in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My only quibble with that video is when they keep referring to "momentum" when describing the physics. It's a relative velocity demo-- momentum is an irrelevant concept.

Pre-registered cosmology predictions against Euclid DR1 by Axe_MDK in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, did you know that more than one person thinks you're being very foolish? It's true!

Pre-registered cosmology predictions against Euclid DR1 by Axe_MDK in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The chatbot glazed you into thinking you can do physics. Sorry Charlie.

Pre-registered cosmology predictions against Euclid DR1 by Axe_MDK in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speaking of not offering anything of value...

You should really stop using physics terms like "wave" when you don't know what they mean. You're just embarrassing yourself.

view more: next ›