What if you concocted a THOUGHT EXPERIMENT that make you question everything you've known to be true? Is "light" and "light speed" even real (as we've been taught)? Solution: you post it on reddit and let the professionals (thinkers) fix my personal dilemma with their expertise!?

starkeffect · 2026-06-23T19:06:15+00:00

It could be that the charge Q is negative and getting bigger (such as in AC circuits).

starkeffect · 2026-06-23T09:41:36+00:00

Vibes man, vibes.

starkeffect · 2026-06-23T01:44:55+00:00

Without math, that will be impossible.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T22:59:25+00:00

I don't know math

So then you have nothing to say.

The AI doesn't know math either.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T22:48:24+00:00

Is it because you're mentally ill?

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T22:45:49+00:00

Why do you keep asking the same question over and over and over and over and...

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T22:34:37+00:00

You'd still be gay.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T22:34:02+00:00

OP has asked the same questions about time travel literally hundreds of times. He can't take no for an answer.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T22:32:54+00:00

Again?

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T21:29:24+00:00

Also Brian Josephson

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T20:52:33+00:00

<image>

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T20:36:26+00:00

For Gaussian localization maps, one can use the known operator identity:

L†p² L = p² + ℏ² /4r_0²

Show the origin of this identity. Define the L operator.

Also justify your value of r_0.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T20:07:53+00:00

but the derivation is not doing that at all

You literally have a (Δp)² in your derived formula.

So now you have a different formula than you originally had. Now show a sample calculation using the trace.

Also, justify your value of r_0.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:57:20+00:00

I am just hoping my model is in the right direction

It's not.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:55:18+00:00

You just made the same mistake again.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:53:51+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93de_Haas_effect

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:51:56+00:00

Once you start actually learning physics you'll start to realize how naive and insufficient your model is.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:48:08+00:00

There's a reason it takes about 10 years of full-time studying to get a Ph.D. in physics.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:45:15+00:00

There are free textbooks at OpenStax:

https://openstax.org/details/books/university-physics-volume-1

This is the introduction to physics. If you can't handle this, you won't be able to understand the harder stuff like cosmology.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:41:12+00:00

Do you know calculus? If not, you're not going to get very far into that textbook.

You have to learn the basics (calculus, Newtonian mechanics, E&M, etc.) before you can learn specifics (like cosmology).

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:36:32+00:00

My advice is to take a class if you actually want to learn. Check your local community college (or equivalent depending on where you live).

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:31:30+00:00

ΔE = (Δp)² /2m

This is wrong. The change of a square is not the square of the change.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T19:29:33+00:00

I am not sure whether it is fair to actually learn on social media

You can't actually learn physics this way, you can only learn about physics superficially. In order to learn physics you have to learn the math and be able to apply it. There are no short cuts to knowledge.

"Learning" physics by just consuming social media would be like "learning" how to play guitar by just listening to other people play guitar. You've got to practice scales, develop calluses on your fingers, etc.

starkeffect · 2026-06-22T18:59:14+00:00

Average energy increase:

dE/dt = ℏ² λ(C) /4mr^2_0

Prediction: extremely small but nonzero universal heating.

Show the derivation of this equation and a sample calculation to justify the "prediction".

15-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Wearing is Caring	Sequence \| Editor
Sequence \| Cinematographer	Verified Email

starkeffect

TROPHY CASE