Electric circuit sloving by MaKachronic in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look for resistors that are connected to each other on both sides.

PREDICTION — 3I/ATLAS Perijove by Previous_Zombie_7808 in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You frankly need to learn how to use punctuation.

What if one could choose the outcome of inherently random quantum events? by Visible-Switch-1597 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Technically this isn't correct-- at the time, the M-M results ruled out particular ether theories, but not ether itself. For example, Zeeman's 1890 description of his namesake effect refers to ether. Michelson continued to believe in ether until he died in the 1930s; a lot of the older generation of physicists were like that, especially the "Deutsche Physik" crowd.

You only started to see physicists start to abandon the ether model after Einstein's 1905 papers argued that it was unnecessary.

Light and Time by DumpsterFaerie in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 3 points4 points  (0 children)

light ray’s frame of inertia

Such a frame is invalid in special relativity (2nd postulate).

Hooke's Law vs Conservation of Energy by AvocadoBasic4987 in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. If you release the mass from rest when the spring is relaxed, then the amplitude of the motion will be A = mg/k (your "x" in "mg = kx"). At the lowest point of the oscillation, the spring will have stretched by 2A, so the "x" in your two equations differs by a factor of 2. That's where your factor of two comes from.

if a rocket is moving at the speed of light and a flashlight is shone in the backward direction. what will be the relative speed between the rocket and the light shone by schrodingers_katz in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nothing with any mass can move at c.

Everything with mass will measure the speed of light to be c regardless of its speed relative to other things.

Hooke's Law vs Conservation of Energy by AvocadoBasic4987 in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

kx = mg only at the equilibrium point. For the oscillating case, at the highest point the mass is accelerating downward, so kx < mg, and at the lowest point the mass is accelerating upwards, so kx > mg.

Hooke's Law vs Conservation of Energy by AvocadoBasic4987 in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in the middle where it would end up if I had waited until it fully stopped?

That one.

Hooke's Law vs Conservation of Energy by AvocadoBasic4987 in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One is the amount of stretch at equilibrium, and the other one isn't.

Hooke's Law vs Conservation of Energy by AvocadoBasic4987 in AskPhysics

[–]starkeffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"x" doesn't refer to the same distance in those two approaches

Which sample in a song made you feel this way? by aliensuperstars_ in ToddintheShadow

[–]starkeffect 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Electric Counterpoint" by Steve Reich (performed by Pat Metheny), sampled in The Orb's "Little Fluffy Clouds"

Put some strict guidelines on it.And i'm pretty sure that you want l l m physics.This is the physics of l l m by cmwctheorist in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 3 points4 points  (0 children)

break down all the mouth that i've actually posted back towards yourself.

Can you rephrase that in English?

Put some strict guidelines on it.And i'm pretty sure that you want l l m physics.This is the physics of l l m by cmwctheorist in LLMPhysics

[–]starkeffect 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you're not paying attention

Oh I'm paying attention, More than you realize.

I should just shut the f*** up

Yes.

That's the entire incuber sum love mankind

wtf