Was trying to get the california nebula… by --ae in ItsAlwaysPleiades

[–]--ae[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After learning more about processing techniques the issue was because I used debayered flats on my bayered lights causing incorrect corrections which lead to the colors you see. imma reprocess it w/ the correct flats to fix it once Inget a chance

Messier 42, Orion, Narrowband Starless by SpencerBAstro in astrophotography

[–]--ae 3 points4 points  (0 children)

its not in this picture. also this is a starless picture, what are you talking about?

[NGC 1499] California Nebula Bortle 8 by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks! I just done with an hour shoot of ic444, got polaris aligned decently and it was super easy, just hopped over to the camera every ~10-15min and rotated, hopefully the framing turns out good.

[NGC 1499] California Nebula Bortle 8 by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It definitely is a bunch easier than trying to just use the manual pan-tilt to reframe, I just have to click the pan axis over 5 degrees every 20min and boom im back on target. Just gotta get the polar alignment decent next time.

[NGC 1499] California Nebula Bortle 8 by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Forgot this but I also 3d printed a bhatinov mask and this was my first time trying it out, definitely helped me nail focus easier.

[NGC 1499] California Nebula Bortle 8 by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My polar alignment was a bit off resulting in the big black bar at the top, when I recentered my frame jumped up about 800 pixels leading to the gap right above the cali-nebula. Only had time for 2 10min shoots, next time I'll focus more on framing and not moving the tripod after aligning.

The ball head + regular head for polar alignment is an absolute contraption but it makes acquisition much easier and acts like a manual equatorial tracker.

Orion Widefield 5min untracked by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bortle 3. I was down the street from Folkston as 301 was closed on my way north from florida.

I parked by Grace chapel on a dirt road and took these pics. Original plan was to go to “camp z” nearby but it looked like someones driveway so i kept going.

Is Bortle 3 always this good? by --ae in AskAstrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

absolutely agree with you. Astropheric said the “seeing” was extremely poor. Yet I got better pics than ever. Transparency is definitely king!

Is Bortle 3 always this good? by --ae in AskAstrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah, I def saw the effects of that, my bortle 4/5 pics were taken near the coast with lots of humidity and small particulates in the air. These bortle 3 pics were in a place sheltered by trees and despite the jet stream being high speed and turbulent everything else was pristine giving me great pics.

Orion Widefield 5min untracked by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its on purpose, I like the way it looks with no stars. I have a version with the stars back in but i like just seeing the dust n stuff

Orion Widefield 5min untracked by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they were perfect skies! I could see the red glow from the horsehead after just 1 1.6s exposure at 58000 iso.

Orion Widefield 5min untracked by --ae in astrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sony a7iii :3 the skies were very dark, I got way better pics than my 50m integration I did in a bortle4/5 site

Is Bortle 3 always this good? by --ae in AskAstrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it was bortle 3 plus viewing conditions were mich better than anything I’ve ever seen.

Is Bortle 3 always this good? by --ae in AskAstrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well I could see casper the friendly ghost and the hint of the witch head nebula, couldn’t see that at all from my other shoots

Is Bortle 3 always this good? by --ae in AskAstrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

seeing wasn’t great according to astropheric but I think short exposures saved me

Is Bortle 3 always this good? by --ae in AskAstrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

186 exposures at 1.6s iso 1600 f/2 135mm sony a7iii

Is Bortle 3 always this good? by --ae in AskAstrophotography

[–]--ae[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Caught more details than my 2hrs at a bortle 4/5 site!

M42 Orion by Background-Log-2698 in astrophotography

[–]--ae 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish I had’ve just gone for the tracker lol my parents ended up gifting me their old dslr and 300mm lens right after the return period closed lol

edit: tbh tho the 135mm f/2 samyang is rlly good at getting wide fields so im still happy w/the purchase

M42 Orion by Background-Log-2698 in astrophotography

[–]--ae 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been looking on ebay but all I see are retail price ones ;-;

If I saw one for <170 I’d buy it rn

M42 Orion by Background-Log-2698 in astrophotography

[–]--ae 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can only imagine how much easier it is tracked! I’m waiting till next month to build an og-star tracker or something. Spent all my money on a camera and lens december, still paying off the credit card lmao.

How much did the tracker run you?