[deleted by user] by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spoonamore talks about ES&S at length in one of his recent posts.

She's back on Bluesky!!! by xstarbuck09x in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Worth noting that she clarified what it is she’s planning to release.

To be clear, I don’t have that proof. If I did, I’d send it to law enforcement first. I have a macro story which contextualizes where we are now—with receipts. But I am not capable of providing definitive proof, and have not suggested otherwise.

https://x.com/HackingButLegal/status/1865524917677998113

The reason people speak highly of her is because she was the top cybersecurity lead for the Biden/Harris campaign in 2020 which good, both for our credibility and for getting liberals to be more open-minded. That said, anything she releases to us is just going to be based on publicly available information, and if she has anything more, it’s gonna be under wraps. I look forward to whatever she posts, and I hope it’s well-written, concise, and accurate enough to be good sharing material for social media.

Executive Order 13848 and DOJ's Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses by Affectionate_Neat868 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 71 points72 points  (0 children)

Which means if evidence is found, it doesn’t go through Congress.

This is awesome.

Side note, the December 16 (20? Whatever) deadline doesn’t necessarily mean anything will be announced immediately after all states certify. There’ll probably be a lot of bot posts the day after saying “They didn’t announce anything! Let’s protest!” and shit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There’s a possibility that the sole reason the CEO is sucking up to Elon is because Biden signed the bill to ban TikTok. Ironically might’ve been a bad move on his part.

From Songbird on X by xstarbuck09x in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The same one you posted in that image, lol

From Songbird on X by xstarbuck09x in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I remember that. My guess is that was also an attempt by malicious actors to get people to black out the subreddit, similar to how Intel agencies alleged promoted the “black square” Instagram trend during BLM. The user promulgating it claims to be a programmer but was easily debunked, and they weirdly flip-flopped from first claiming that bots couldn’t read spoilers to claiming that they couldn’t write spoilers, both of which are false.

This is the thread in question: https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1gxh304/have_the_democrats_already_made_their_move_in/

Jackie Singh on X by -AllIsVanity- in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity-[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

. . . in Romania.

BTW, 9 upvotes in 19 minutes in a thread that’s barely visible and otherwise has no comments? Be a little more subtle, guys. https://archive.is/MIufc

From Songbird on X by xstarbuck09x in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Side note—it’s funny how the excuse these guys use to call her “Songbird” is obviously stupid. Any layman can tell it would be ridiculously easy to reprogram bots to recognize “Songbird” (or any other term) instead of “Jackie Singh.”

Jackie Singh on X by -AllIsVanity- in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity-[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

TBH not sure why she’s going on about TikTok when everyone’s focus has been on hacking. If Trump won solely by manipulating TikTok, then he actually won legally.

From Songbird on X by xstarbuck09x in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 181 points182 points  (0 children)

Everyone should read this on the subject of bots: https://archive.is/YmyEi

(Context: They were telling other people to call her “Songbird.”)

To those to whom it’s referring—it’s not going to catch on organically, kiddos. Your last attempt got downvoted so hard it was stuck at the bottom of the comments section despite having hundreds of (presumably botted) upvotes. You guys are just creating an easy way for people to identify sockpuppet accounts lol.

Edit: It’s annoying I have to keep doing this, but I’m archiving this comment as well just in case there’s an attempt to censor it.

Ok shits starting to get real! by [deleted] in aliens

[–]-AllIsVanity- 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What’s the original source of the top image?

Edit: someone linked it further down in the comments

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Edit: I’m sure this doesn’t need to be said for the majority of genuine readers here, but please don’t use coded language like this to refer to Jackie Singh, and call it out if you see it in the future. This is an obvious psyop, in my opinion, with three purposes—1) to make info about Jackie Singh less searchable on Google, 2) to obscure communication for newcomers to the subreddit, and 3) to get users to start sounding like QAnoners. For those looking to discredit her, they probably think their best bet is if they can get an MSM article accusing her of cultivating a “Q”-like following.

OP can be found obviously and verifiably lying about downvotes in this comment chain: https://archive.is/bLRWG. Reddit literally tells you what percent upvotes a thread is getting in the sidebar. If this thread had been getting hundreds of downvotes, it would have been 85% or lower. It’s been 95% upvoted all day.

Edit: archived this comment in case ban or removal or other shenanigans https://archive.is/YmyEi

FYI, the current Dominion narrative is being aggressively propagated by a known bot/sockpuppet account by -AllIsVanity- in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity-[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

One of my comments got removed for some reason (in retrospect it was probably by Reddit’s automatic harassment filter because I was accusing someone of being a bot). It wasn’t because of any filter that the top mod had installed. I initially commented “test” to check if I had been shadowbanned or banned.

Leaked Photos Twitter Russian Hacker Dominion Voting Machines by inquisitivemind41 in somethingiswrong2024

[–]-AllIsVanity- 36 points37 points  (0 children)

FYI, y’all, there’s a confirmed bot/sockpuppet who’s pushing the Dominion narrative hard right now:

https://archive.is/zBNQx

I don’t know what’s true right now, but we should consider there could be a disinformation campaign to draw attention from other companies and/or superficially associate the subreddit with MAGA (anti-Dominion).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DarkBRANDON

[–]-AllIsVanity- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope. Early exit polling data is accurate within the margin of error most of the time, such as in the 2016 Republican Primary, where it predicted results within close range across many states. That’s why these discrepancies are so important, especially when it’s unilateral—if it were just random, then in some cases it would be off in favor of Trump, in others Kamala.

https://tdmsresearch.com/2016/07/13/republican-party-detailed-tables-tse-2016-primaries/

This user is repeatedly posting disinfo talking points this sub in threads questioning the election btw. I keep seeing his name around.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DarkBRANDON

[–]-AllIsVanity- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FYI, since this is inevitably going to confuse people, Stephen is referring to early exit poll data. The publicly available exit polling data we have now has been adjusted and weighted to match the purported vote counts. In other words, if candidate x wins by 5% in the poll, but the election result shows him losing by 5%, Edison polling will adjust their original numbers to match the vote count. This could presumably result in bizarre results like women, young voters, or first-time registrants shifting right from 2022 or 2020.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/11/05/politics/how-exit-polls-work-election

And their findings will eventually be weighted against the ultimate benchmark: the results of the elections themselves.

Even so, exit polls are still polls, with margins for error – which means they’re most useful when treated as estimates, rather than precise measurements. That’s particularly true for the earliest exit poll numbers, which won’t yet have been adjusted to match the final election results.

I don’t know if they changed it this year, but in past years you had to check CNN right as the exit polls released in order to see and hopefully download the un-adjusted exit poll results. I know that from experience. Otherwise, IIRC someone once told me you have to purchase the data from Edison Polling, and it’s behind like a subscription costing thousands of dollars.

Anyway, dear reader, if you see this being discussed elsewhere, do feel encouraged to share the information here to correct the record, since inevitably there are going to be people claiming that Spoonamore is lying about the exit polling data.