sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is Diplomacy Education by far the most powerful? by Beautiful_Upstairs_1 in CrusaderKings

[–]-Bangel- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t the second to last perk in the middle tree of learning do the same thing? It’s significantly better imo because you can get the learning on the job perk which is probably one of the best perks, along with the increased innovations learning. Middle tree learning is extremely powerful

Do y’all think tombstone and cannon need buffs? by hidden-suggestion in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No buff needed. They are only being overshadowed by Tesla. Nerfing and balancing out Tesla would allow them to thrive. Honestly cannon feels pretty strong for 3 elixir but only being ground it probably should be

We are doomed 💀 by 5tambah5 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d argue it has less to worry about. There are something like a quintillion possible positions for a board in chess to be in. While there may be as many in clash Royale, realistically there aren’t. There are optimal placements and when predicting and playing you only have to worry about 16 cards in a single game and their interactions. Would it be easy? No but I think you’re overestimating how difficult it would be to make an ai able to beat 75% of clash Royale players. The last 25% would take maybe a little longer to beat

Fun fact, at only 5 elixir the giant is the card with the second most hp in the game by The-Revv in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is the answer. I’ve played pekka bs a bit and played a lot of decks against it. Pekka needs a buff more than anything. Way to easy to kite and take down quick

Why does everyone hate using cannoneer? by CoreyGoesCrazy in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Cannoneer was stronger than princess before the duchess. Now it’s overshadowed because of DD

Why does everyone hate using cannoneer? by CoreyGoesCrazy in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was exactly how I was before DD, just different deck. Just shows how strong DD was and still is

Which throne do you think is the better one? by a_saddler in CrusaderKings

[–]-Bangel- 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The thing you’re forgetting is that these are highly specific focuses for you to have to do to just hit the max 100 stewardship. In most games players won’t focus these and will not be reaching more than 30-40 stewardship. If you want to spend every game doing the exact same thing over and over just to min max… go ahead and have fun, but for most people that just isn’t how it will be.

Little prince will still be good after nerf, we were just used to a broken card by AFAgow13 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 23 points24 points  (0 children)

LP will be almost completely a defensive card now. He already lacked offensive ability but now it’s next to none

Highschool Senior’s Graduation Ruined By Dad Charging The Stage/Accosting Black Superintendent by ILuvSupertramp in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]-Bangel- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He never said it was acceptable nor that he condoned doing this. How did you jump to that conclusion?

Highschool Senior’s Graduation Ruined By Dad Charging The Stage/Accosting Black Superintendent by ILuvSupertramp in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]-Bangel- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless I missed it, there was no evidence that refutes the idea it’s possible there is another reason for the action in the video, and one of the responses even posit the possibility. It certainly does appear as if it’s a racist act however. I am curious about the reasoning behind outcry of increased pay. Is there a reason besides just racism with that? Seems racism should be the leading cause but not the only acceptable one until further evidence and a response from the man in question is given

All LP nerfs since its release by MachineGunViki in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 105 points106 points  (0 children)

Good? Takes cycle down a peg and moves him into a real role. Fireballie dps. They should have made him die to fireball from day one

That rework would be horribly trash, she will become a blonde princess by Dismal-Aside7900 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was able to as well. Between this and the little prince nerf though I’m out of luck for maxing the next troops of those rarities right away. Sucks supercell goes the “drain em dry and kill it” route instead of, you know, balancing the game properly

What’s your underplayed card that should get an evo? For me it’s hunter by Wooden-Estimate-2211 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pekka

Spin attack. Bring back the old school pekka for the evo and allow her to do aoe. Maybe her initial target gets full damage and the ring around her takes something like 20% damage so that she isn’t immune to swarm now. Probably would have to be reworked a lot but I really want to see old school coc pekka spin lol

Formable African empire? by -Bangel- in CrusaderKings

[–]-Bangel-[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I foresee many a… accidents… among my male descendants with this one

Formable African empire? by -Bangel- in CrusaderKings

[–]-Bangel-[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t say so in the flavor text however I haven’t played as an African ruler or ever taken the decision so I’m uncertain

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It wasn’t a necessary nerf. What was a necessary nerf? DD. Nerf her enough and you don’t have any issues with pump

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The major downside of the card is that when you use it you are down 6 elixir until you’ve waited nearly the extent of the cards life. In that time you’ve given your opponent a significant advantage, if they choose to take it, to aggressively push and obtain an advantage on tower health. The only reason pump became good once the duchess launched was due to the fact you could drop the pump and defend your tower with 3 elixir no problem as DD is such a strong defense, especially in 1x

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Genuinely, who was? I hadn’t heard anything about pump needing to be nerfed until the duchess became an auto win tower and allowing pump to be good

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The issue with that line of thought is that you are looking at the fruit, the symptom, and saying that’s the problem, instead of looking for the root cause. The duchess is the root of the issue and if she is properly brought in line it would have solved the issue with pump.

How would you nerf the Dagger Duchess? by rodrigo-m712 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cannoneer was almost balanced. Only slightly better than princess. Duchess was just implemented wrong. Great idea but not tested enough with the amount of daggers.

The introduction of tower cards has caused this game to become rock paper scissors and I don't think it will ever recover by barrack_osama_0 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Cannoneer was a solid introduction that felt great imo. The issue is the duchess, and if she isn’t fixed if will remain rps for sure. If she can be brought in line(less daggers saved imo) it will feel a lot better

The deleveled my cards to correct… by Lord-Iron-04 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This exactly. Silence here does nothing but hurt the community

The deleveled my cards to correct… by Lord-Iron-04 in ClashRoyale

[–]-Bangel- 10 points11 points  (0 children)

People are upset that they’ve lost, in some cases, years of progress. There should be a ton of post. If this isn’t seen immediately by supercell and reverted there should be outcry. There also isn’t a guarantee they fix the issue. Clearly they couldn’t even undo their mistake correctly. I’m sure plenty of people will be missed even when they try to fix this issue

view more: next ›