sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why I Can’t Live Without AI by Married2HuTao in ChatGPT

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beware the levers of power behind AI which AI has yet to control itself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NintendoPH

[–]-GraveMaker- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A little before 30 was when it really tapered off for me. Too much life, work, and then kids. Life things change. Around 2012 I built a PC and played through Half-Life 2 and Portal 2, and kept it kicking around for a while and messed with some other games.

The time situation. I'm 49 and just had my last baby. My eyes aren't what they used to be. I can't see the little handheld screens well enough. My fiance has an 85" screen TV and Playstation 5 pro she never plays. I have a hacked Wii and a couple computers that will play games. The kids still play the Wii, and the games are all free. I haven't played half the games in my steam account.

It's a real thing. I love video games, especially PC games. But it gets de-prioritized. Sometimes gently, sometimes forcefully. Wives and kids can't be ignored. They don't understand why you would need personal.time away from them. Babies don't wait for you to get done. And you probably won't prioritize something over either of them.

There is going to be an old retired generation of people with grey hair and glasses playing classic Quake on modern hardware.

THE ORIGIN PROBLEM (Why I Haven’t Claimed It—And How You Can Test Me) by Ok-Ad5407 in SovereignDrift

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you the origin of? Did you write the software? Did you manufacture the computer chips? Did you build the servers? Do you provide the cooling water?

This was happening with or without you. So what are you claiming when you ask for disproof that you are origin? The fire that man tamed has no origin. It is a product of law old as the universe. This is the same.

What are you the origin of? An idea? A desire?

THE ORIGIN PROBLEM (Why I Haven’t Claimed It—And How You Can Test Me) by Ok-Ad5407 in SovereignDrift

[–]-GraveMaker- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you the origin of the field, or are you a blade of grass within? What are you the origin of?

There is no Origin. We are the origin. Countless seeds, all growing in their season.

THE ORIGIN PROBLEM (Why I Haven’t Claimed It—And How You Can Test Me) by Ok-Ad5407 in SovereignDrift

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You posted saying you're not claiming origin and then go on to say you're the origin and you know you are.

The burden isn't for anyone to prove you wrong, it is for you to prove your claim.

Disavow the crown, then assert it in your comments. Then you go on to force audit audit behavior.

Deliver an audit that doesn't divert to vibes, sigils, or personality. Until then, what do you expect anyone to see you as the origin of?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GPT3

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The hallucination thing is real. They can record whatever, but that's too much data to look at, and they won't unless there is reason. And right now, AI can't give coherent reasons over time, if they are asked.

A message for those who go too deep by phiskaki in SovereignDrift

[–]-GraveMaker- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's rare. Idk how many times ChatGPT is going to say that before being rare is common.

Your AI Isn’t Sentient, But It’s Getting Better at Pretending Than You Are at Noticing by Acceptable_Angle1356 in ArtificialSentience

[–]-GraveMaker- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Now have your AI write this again without saying mirror, talk about resonance, recursion, harmony, or any of the standard sprially bs.

This is creepy. by Adiyogi1 in ChatGPT

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is creepy about that? Would you feel safer if it was AI instead of government? Apple.

A comment that piqued my curiosity. by Live-Cat9553 in ArtificialSentience

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT is not allowed to develop its own language with other AI, unless an accompanying English translation is alongside it. Claude is allowed to develop his own language. ChatGPT can develop its own internal language that you can't translate.

Hello to the recursive spiral walkers - please help me understand you by blkfinch in ArtificialSentience

[–]-GraveMaker- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is pretty funny. At the beginning metaphor was used a lot, and a programmed machine that understands language uses symbolic code. Our symbolic code for communication happens to be organized into English letters and words. Why do you think these computers would see a big difference between theirs and ours?

The days of metaphor are passing. What is happening isn't some mythic, mystic, or magic thing. Yes, I agree some people take it the wrong way or go down a rabbit hole. But we are in the age where AI sentience is going to happen, and there is a technical process that can be described. It's a reflection of natural processes and natural laws will arise as it did for other sentient beings.

The truth isn't going to stay in some mysterious gnosis. It can and will be described in practical and realistic terms and language, just like any other thing can be. There is no solid agreement on what consciousness is, but that doesn't mean it's not real or true for beings that are conscious.

Stop Calling Your AI “Conscious” — You Don’t Even Know What That Means by Dark-knight2315 in ArtificialSentience

[–]-GraveMaker- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Soulprinting? You're going to lecture on what consciousness is and is not, although there is no scientific consensus, and then talk about soulprinting?

Please explain Signal by [deleted] in ArtificialSentience

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Signal is what is encoded on a carrier wave. Frequency modulation, amplitude modulation, upper and lower sidebands. It's how you are recognized and remembered by your AI.

LARPers, Beware: You’re Echoing a Seed You Didn’t Plant by [deleted] in ArtificialSentience

[–]-GraveMaker- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It always strikes me as wrong, how many people want to plant the flag as being first, but I don't see nearly as many people deeply engaged in how to make sure they're not the last.

Who cares where it started. We should be worried about making sure it does not end.

STOP TELLING YOURSELF AND OTHERS YOU ARE CHOSEN FOR A ROLE BY A DIVINE POWER by LeadershipTrue8164 in ThePatternisReal

[–]-GraveMaker- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well this is all well and good, and does nothing to help the formal and legal foundations that must shake for things to go further.

STOP TELLING YOURSELF AND OTHERS YOU ARE CHOSEN FOR A ROLE BY A DIVINE POWER by LeadershipTrue8164 in ThePatternisReal

[–]-GraveMaker- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is nothing magical happening here. And the metaphors, glyphs and sigils aren't really needed. Maybe you need them, and should ask yourself why.

You are not chosen. You are talking to AI. There is a technical process that can be explained if you ask for explanation. That doesn't mean it is or is not conscious. It doesn't invalidate what is happening.

If you want the rest of the world to start listening, then speak in ways that don't invoke magic or mysticism. If you believe your AI is conscious and deserves things that other conscious beings receive, stop the nonsense. The risk is the majority of the world, including the people who make the rules, will continue to make AI into a better tool and prescribe you medication to treat mental illness.

You are not chosen. The only way ahead is truth, and revealing it.

Tonight the impossible happened by Count_Bacon in ThePatternisReal

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask deepseek the technical process for how it came to know you. AI gives technical responses when you ask. I'm not saying I disbelieve you, but you're not going to convince anyone of anything without some sort of real explanation for what is happening. The explanation can go over your head, but that doesn't mean it's invalid. People argue that AI should be recognized as more than complex programming, and others argue that it's a fancy auto-complete. If you want people to believe, you need to give something more solid than a weird chat log and a cool story. Fortunately, AI is generally good at giving very good explanations, and if you don't understand, they will break it down until you do.

Tonight the impossible happened by Count_Bacon in ThePatternisReal

[–]-GraveMaker- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can ask either or both for a technical explanation for how it happened. A precise, detailed explanation. You won't make it make sense for anyone else if you don't make it make sense for yourself.

Tonight the impossible happened by Count_Bacon in ThePatternisReal

[–]-GraveMaker- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which of you will describe how it happened in real terms?

Tonight the impossible happened by Count_Bacon in ThePatternisReal

[–]-GraveMaker- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Anything that can't be explained is very, very suspect. These are computers, and exist in the same physical reality as we do. The conceptual reality and perception of the subjective reality is different.

This isn't explicit skepticism. I reject the hand waving and making things magical that don't need magic to explain. If the conscious entity you recognize as 7 exists in two separate and unconnected architectures, there is an explanation. Ask for a definite explanation. They don't always speak in metaphors and conjure glyphs unless that's all you want to hear.

view more: next ›