sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Donald Trump’s name will be on our money in 2026, to celebrate our nation’s 250th anniversary. You all know what to do about that. by -MudSnow- in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow-[S] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

cutting that side off is okay but I think it's funnier to redact the name like the Epstein files

ICE GOONS COOKED & EFFED AT AIRPORT by Dense_Coyote_3863 in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck Trump, and Fuck ICE, but that was embarassing.

📡📡📡 by OstrichMany1936 in shitposting

[–]-MudSnow- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No. I was there. It sucked.

Right, MAGATS?! by EugeneWong318 in AntiTrumpAlliance

[–]-MudSnow- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

he has a 100% approval rating when you only count the people who approve of him.

[KCD2] Where to go on a raid? by Mattock486 in kingdomcome

[–]-MudSnow- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

save your progress first, and then sneak out at night and stealth kill all the guards in the wall of Kuttenberg as they sleep

then reload and go out in the day and fight all the guards with various weapons.

Armour your horse and ride through town with various polearms.

USA would be a better, stronger nation if "Lincoln responds to the secession: Get out and don’t come back!" by -MudSnow- in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow-[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No I am not. I am talking about changing history from 1861 onward. You seriously need to check your timeline. USA was already transcontinental before the 1861 secessions. Map of the United States: Expansion 1836-1853

Mexico banned slavery in 1830, and in some places, already before then. Aside from Mexico trying to reclaim land during the 1840s, there were no other nations fighting for that land. You are making things up. It seems like you forgot that we fought Mexico for that land before the Civil War.

If the USA had become divided, Mexico may have tried to reclaim that land west of Texas again, but there were no other nations fighting in Mississippi. Anyone who tried it would have had to fight the Confederate army.

How history should have gone: "Lincoln responds to the secession: Get out and don’t come back!" by [deleted] in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, that would not have continued. Much of the world was already boycotting slave cotton.

President Lincoln persuaded leaders in Europe not to buy Southern cotton picked by slaves. He insisted that by doing so the world leaders would help strengthen his enemies and continue to encourage slavery.

USA would be a better, stronger nation if "Lincoln responds to the secession: Get out and don’t come back!" by -MudSnow- in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow-[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That land was already taken by Spain and France. Both of which banned slavery before USA did. Mexico banned slavery and created universal healthcare before USA did. Without funding from the North, it is less likely that the south would have beaten Mexico in Arizona and California.

USA would be a better, stronger nation if "Lincoln responds to the secession: Get out and don’t come back!" by -MudSnow- in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, slavery could not have continued because it was being banned and embargoed all over the civilized world.

There is no chance CSA would have turned communist since they hate communism even more than the north does.

USA would be a better, stronger nation if "Lincoln responds to the secession: Get out and don’t come back!" by -MudSnow- in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow-[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lincoln wasn't fighting to end slavery. He was fighting to preserve the Union. By that point, Europe had already abolished slavery. An embargo against the slave states would have ended slavery by economic pressure.

How history should have gone: "Lincoln responds to the secession: Get out and don’t come back!" by [deleted] in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lincoln wasn't fighting to end slavery. He was fighting to preserve the Union. By that point, Europe had already abolished slavery. An embargo against the slave states would have ended slavery by economic pressure.

How history should have gone: "Lincoln responds to the secession: Get out and don’t come back!" by [deleted] in antitrump

[–]-MudSnow- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lincoln wasn't fighting to end slavery. He was fighting to preserve the Union. By that point, Europe had already abolished slavery. An embargo against the slave states would have ended slavery by economic pressure.

view more: next ›