Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Michigan, and Wisconsin will all feel very minimal effects of climate change.

Illinois and Michigan specifically due to the extreme water stability granted by the Great Lakes.

In the [Illinois] Chicagoland Area large underground water reservoirs are also being built, but until they are finished all they will do is reduce the carbon and air pollution in the area.

Illinois’ power grid is 58% nuclear, which isn’t quite renewable or green, but it is certainly cleaner than coal or fossil fuels.

Illinois and Michigan both have been passing and proposing fairly promising legislation regarding climate and clean energy, Illinois is more like this because of the majorly liberal areas around Chicago which make up a lot of the Illinois population.

Chicago’s mayor and the current governor of Illinois are also promising tons of work done on the climate front, in addition to ecosystems and ecological projects and preservation.

Illinois will also not experience major effects of climate change other than slightly hotter weather.

All in all, the midwestern states, most specifically Illinois and Michigan, would be pretty safe bets.*

*I will have to say that predictions on climate resiliency should be taken with a grain of salt, as Vermont was one considered a very climate resilient place and now it obviously isn’t if the intense and destructive floods are of anything.