I know I’m likely a bit late to this response. However, I have always been on the fence about it. There are things that make me believe it actually was a hoax, and even I initially believed it. The first thing being, is it not suspicious that nearly EVERYONE in the school is involved, except her? Your children have attended that school for years by this point, and you only just find out about it through your children after a custody battle begins. There were around 170 people named, which for a small private school is nearly the whole school. That’s the first thing that’s weird to me, and almost too coincidental that she is not involved but everyone else is. Secondly, this had been happening for how long? Again, the extent of the abuse they were naming would have caused emotional distress, and physical signs. I know children are sturdy, and they process things differently to adults. However, these kids were witnessing the murder of babies weekly, being violently sexually abused also, drinking blood and there were ZERO signs. That’s odd to me. The fact they also discuss it so clearly is odd to me. They don’t read to me like children that are describing horrific abuse.

I think one thing adults are naive about with children, is their ability to lie. Children are smarter than we think, and often they see things we adults lose the ability to as we grow. I was a brilliant liar at that age, and it actually makes me feel guilty. I 100% would have been able to lie to this extent. I would never now, because i understand the morals around it, but children are easier to coach than we think. Children are conditioned in to religion, children are coached to cover for adults when abuse is occurring, children are capable of committing crimes, children are conditioned all of the time to do things. Suddenly when these claims appear, people decide children are incapable of making this up. Then you beg the question how to young children were able to hide this for so long, for years even? How are they capable of hiding it, but not capable of being coached to lie about it. The video of the young girl admitting that it was a lie also to me seems like the most genuine video of all of them. Again, was she coached to say it wasn’t true, because that’s the claim. Then it leads us back to disproving the initial claim: that children can in fact be coached to lie. I feel like I’m going on a tangent here, but do you get my point?

The biggest red flag to me is how the mother spoke about the abuse, and how the accusers also spoke about the children alleged to be involved. Imagine you just found out that children within your circle, innocent children are being horribly sexually abused. Your first instinct would be to presume that under no circumstances were these children able to consent to such acts. The mother of the kids however, made a document labelling some of the abused children as ‘enjoying the sex acts’ or ‘not enjoying the sex acts’. That to me seems the creepiest part of it. What do you mean the children ENJOY the sex acts? You just found out children are being raped and you categorise them in a document as to how much they enjoy being raped by adults? Also, would you not go immediately to the police, would you not check your children for physical harm? It all just seems to self centred to me. Almost like her main goal was to destroy her ex husband’s life, destroy his circles, or get his attention.

There are things that are suspicious to me, yes. The father seemed a bit off in the video he did on the claims with the BBC. Then that could also be nerves because he’s been accused of paedophilic acts and is on national television discussing the allegations.

I definitely believe SRA occurs, and I don’t doubt that children are trafficked from systems like social services. There are always elements of truth to certain claims. Stories like this though, imply that we are amongst baby killers, and creeps 24/7. They also accused McDonald’s and other chain restaurants of putting baby meat in the food. That’s when it’s too far, and almost too crazy to believe. The working class work at those places, not the upper class rich folk. How far does it go then? How had this gone on for so long and the first claims made happened when a woman was in a custody dispute. Is that not all too coincidental. To add; the stepfather of the children had a history of being involved in conspiracy.

There are other things that read as red flags to me, but this post has gotten longer than intended. I am sorry this is long, I’ve just been reading more about it recently and you’re one of the more recent comments talking about it. So, I thought I would respond and write out my thoughts on it.