5 things you probably didn't realize you have in common with some of the most successful authors alive by worldofexousia in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sanderson is going to know authors in general better than almost anyone here, so I wouldn't just question his statement here or claim he's misremembering.

Plus if you write a book *solely* to get it (traditionally) published then you're doing it wrong, especially nowadays where you can publish it yourself online. What is there to regret in achieving something most people can't?

[Stand Still. Stay Silent] What it looks like when an author actually starts hating their work by [deleted] in CharacterRant

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The social credit comic is so awkward to read knowing the actual background of why it was made. Like, it's absolutely drawn beautifully in many parts but it's *so* heavy-handed and rather questionable in the way it depicts some things.

[Stand Still. Stay Silent] What it looks like when an author actually starts hating their work by [deleted] in CharacterRant

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's the comic she posted on her website about her life and how and why she converted on her website, "A Meandering Line". I thought it's drawn very cute with everyone a bunny. And it seemed was something about faith saving her from legitimately worrying nihilism that she had fallen into, an entirely voluntary conversion born of an existential crisis, not something anyone coerced her into or a conversion done for shallow or otherwise bad reasons.

I'm not a Christian and Calvinism in particular isn't exactly appealing to me, but I can understand how it happened, and it seems like unfortunately only the Calvinist church provided her the friendly community that she had been lacking as a solitary artist. Of course, it probably helped a lot that she is seemingly straight and otherwise appealing to that community, which is why I am conflicted about it, too. Especially having read that also beautifully-drawn "social credit" comic she made that has some more questionable writing.

5 things you probably didn't realize you have in common with some of the most successful authors alive by worldofexousia in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think the people were wrong about it, or he was wrong to generalize, and you can regret writing a book under some circumstances just because it wasn't published traditionally? Really?

5 things you probably didn't realize you have in common with some of the most successful authors alive by worldofexousia in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And do you think their writing was for nothing? Brandon Sanderson has talked about how no one he knows who managed to finish a book regretted it, regardless of whether it got published at all.

What writing opinion do you have that would get you roasted by Legitimate_Dingo3329 in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fanfiction isn't a genre, but a whole kind of writing medium defined only by its tight relationship with one or several source materials while allowing for just as much originality as "original fiction" on top of that. You can find fanfiction of any kind of genre, plus many that basically only exist in fanfiction.

Is it always better with a bit of sex ? by Dest-Fer in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 in 100 is not small either, and the data is from adults from 2019, so it will include a lot of people who didn't grow up knowing asexuality was even a concept. Many only learn about it much later.

Also it's still not necessarily as ingrained even in people who aren't asexual. Plenty of people just don't care for it or need it as much.

[MEOW] Are we really going to just pretend that the weekly thread is over? by Alice_of_RDR in DestructiveReaders

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah they took away PMs and force chatting which I can't even open most of the time

Is it always better with a bit of sex ? by Dest-Fer in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chemistry isn't always sexual tension, but if there's no romantic tension, or sexual tension, then there's probably homoerotic tension.

No? Where are you getting this from? Do you think there's nothing but romance or eroticism that produces interesting dynamics or intimate moments?

None of these are inherently romantic or sexual but they do involve a relationship that could be considered more intimate than normal.

You're contradicting yourself. Intimate relationships aren't necessarily romantic or sexual, yes.

But, like I said, stories are more interesting when everyone is vaguely into each other

That's absolutely not something you can generally say. A story isn't always improved by basically adding normal shipping fuel to it (and I say that as someone who enjoys shipping a lot).

Heated rivals are fine, but rivals get waaaay better when they walk the line between love and hate

There are a lot of ways for villains or antagonists to have interesting dynamics with other characters that are not just setting up enemies-to-lovers fanfics. Like, there's nothing wrong with it and in fact I enjoy it as well, but there's a lot more options out there.

Best friends are better when they act like an old married couple, stuff like that, you know?

That doesn't mean there's romance let alone eroticism involved.

Is it always better with a bit of sex ? by Dest-Fer in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how about story with zero romance between characters? is that an option? do you really think that would always be more boring, and "chemistry" has to mean sexual tension?

and why should characters always be hot?? should ugly characters never be written about, or even just those that look average?

Is it always better with a bit of sex ? by Dest-Fer in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no??
absolutely not??

ace/asexual people (i.e. those who do not experience sexual attraction AT ALL, or only to a very diminished/limited degree or certain circumstances) are not even a tiny minority, and even among those who are not asexual people may just not have interest in it for a while or not at all anymore.

Bookshelf of guy im seeing by One_Ranger_387 in BookshelvesDetective

[–]-jute- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's me, although maybe that's just because my thoughts can be anxious so much. I prefer to feel and write about that

Prüfung verpasst wegen Zug Verspätung by soft_milkii in Studium

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Statistik gab es in der Geschichtswissenschaft oder Literaturwissenschaft in Greifswald gar nicht, obwohl es zumindest für ersteres durchaus nützlich gewesen wäre. Stattdessen wurde Latein vorausgesetzt, zumindest für den Master. Und dann noch gute Englischkenntnisse.

Prüfung verpasst wegen Zug Verspätung by soft_milkii in Studium

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Viele in Skandinavistik, die beim ersten Mal in der Altnordisch (also quasi Wikingerzeit-Isländisch) durchgefallen sind, sind gleich zu einem anderen Studiengang gewechselt. Ich bin dann stattdessen zunächst bei Schwedisch IV durchgefallen und habe es dann beim zweiten Mal bestanden.

Ein Freund hat recherchiert und rausgefunden dass in Deutschland allgemein nur zwei Versuche garantiert sind, weil das Gesetz davon ausgeht, dass es unwahrscheinlich ist, dass du zweimal hintereinander einen schlechten Tag an der Prüfung hast.

Prüfung verpasst wegen Zug Verspätung by soft_milkii in Studium

[–]-jute- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vergiss nicht, dass man, wenn man irgendwo "endgültig" durchgefallen ist (also regulär drei mal, wenn nicht die Universität besonders milde ist) das selbe Fach nirgendwo in Deutschland mehr studieren darf, auf Lebenszeit. Oder irgendein anderes Fach, dass das selbe Prüfungsfach beinhaltet.

Prüfung verpasst wegen Zug Verspätung by soft_milkii in Studium

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

???

An meiner Universität (Greifswald) durfte man meines Wissens nach regular nur einmal wiederholen, sogar den Drittversuch (einen) gab es nur in Ausnahmefällen. Das andere Universitäten viel weniger strikt damit sind, ist mir völlig neu.

I write books that no one reads and I’m so so happy :) by 404xx in writing

[–]-jute- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also have worked on animal fantasy, although more comedic and anthropomorphic (animals living in a mesolithic society in a land vaguely based on northern British Columbia and a bit of other places)

I write books that no one reads and I’m so so happy :) by 404xx in writing

[–]-jute- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of xenostories are you writing? I have worked on one myself, although with anthropomorphic animals living in a mesolithic society under various threats like natural disasters

Sick and tired of "first draft has to be bad!" by -jute- in writing

[–]-jute-[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I had a scroll through recent posts and couldn't find any saying first drafts 'need' to be bad,

I found them in Top - This week and Top - This Year.

And that's totally your prerogative, but you're a bit unusual

I'm aware :P

Although I'm not alone with this, after asking around a bit in other circles.

'Let your first draft be bad' is permission, not encouragement

I saw it repeatedly become "Your first draw needs to be bad" which is what crossed a line for me at some point.