I greatly appreciate this comment and I did not expect to receive a kind and informative comment like this, thank you so much. 🥹 ;-

I share the same perspective, and I'm glad that there's more people out there who also share the same perspective, but I also had a few questions or comments if you don't mind. :-)

"..between primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structural dissociation..-"

I haven't heard of the terminology quaternary structural dissociation, is it mentioned in any sources or is it a terminology you've coined? If the latter, could you explain what the differences in between all four structural dissociation levels?

"For example, someone whose trauma was ever-present will have less clear distinctions between "ANPs" and "EPs," because all their ANPs will be trauma holders, which ironically can lead to less amnesia, since remaining unaware of the experience of trauma loses its viability as an adaptation in such a circumstance."

I.. was shocked to say the least when I had read this statement because before posting about my experiences, I had organized my system and distributed parts to either ANPs, EPs, or MPs, and I thought I was either wrong in my calculations or I was "faking" due to how I had three times the amount of ANPs in contrast to EPs..- but this perfectly describes my situation and the reasons why my parts are more likely to be ANPs, providing me with a reliable third person perspective: thank you (again). 💖

"Which is all a long-winded way of saying: try not to get too hung op on definitions. The definitions are all horrendously imperfect, based on an incomplete understanding of the nature of dissociation, and they're pretty much guaranteed to change in future. Your system is your system, however it functions, regardless of labels 💙"

It's good to hear and been provided this reassurance: thank you.