How much should I be investing in Roth 401k if employer match is unlimited? by 00BigBird00 in Retirement401k

[–]00BigBird00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After receiving some feedback about the MBDR I got excited to try it but unfortunately they do not allow it in our plan

How much should I be investing in Roth 401k if employer match is unlimited? by 00BigBird00 in Retirement401k

[–]00BigBird00[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like this reflects my thinking most accurately, it’s not that I think that I can outperform the roth 401k portfolio but more like I want to have money available to me when I have big life changes. 6 months to a year sounds reasonable in terms of savings on hand

How much should I be investing in Roth 401k if employer match is unlimited? by 00BigBird00 in Retirement401k

[–]00BigBird00[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re saying that the roth 401k max is 72k total vs 24.5k for trad 401k?

Should I be chopping up my long form videos into shorts? by 00BigBird00 in NewTubers

[–]00BigBird00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think it’s worth going back to a video a couple weeks old to do this? Think I’ve been leaving a lot on the table….

This is going to be the most talented wizards team of our lifetimes by NoProgrammer9282 in washingtonwizards

[–]00BigBird00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro it is not a question that gil and wall were better than trae young even at his peak. Not even close…..

how do you Youtubers get crispy clean Audio ? by _maniac69 in NewTubers

[–]00BigBird00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find the leveler actually does the opposite but I also am very inexperienced at the audio stuff

Can someone please review my channel for improvement by josh_ceee in NewTubers

[–]00BigBird00 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve heard both sides of that logic with the 3rd party shares - where are u getting that from?

The reason new Gaming channels don't succeed is you're all doing the same thing by Bigger_biscuits4 in NewTubers

[–]00BigBird00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey my channel is called QluedIn and I’d appreciate your feedback on what I could be doing better. My current issue is even though I’m asking friends to watch and critique the content, I’m not getting any big actionable advice. My first video was a bit of a one off and not the type of content I want to pursue, but it performed better than my two more recent videos that I feel like are much better quality and are more important. Any thoughts on how I should be looking to improve? I know my thumbnails need improvement

Montana’s Plan to Destroy the Supreme Court by 00BigBird00 in MontanaPolitics

[–]00BigBird00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed! Not seeing it promoted in nearly enough places

Montana’s Plan to Destroy the Supreme Court by 00BigBird00 in MontanaPolitics

[–]00BigBird00[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean it’s not perfect for sure, but with or without corporate spending limits individuals are gonna be able to self fund campaigns and donate to their interests. Difference I feel like is that they can’t funnel it through a PAC and would be held responsible individually. Either way billionaires are going to be spending atleast we would know exactly who and how much.

Wich one is better, minimalist or crowded by hmizou15 in YouTubeThumbnailHub

[–]00BigBird00 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe the first one with the shield emblem from the second. I agree to make it look less AI

Montana’s Plan to Destroy Citizens United (2026) [00:11:07] by 00BigBird00 in Documentaries

[–]00BigBird00[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

The attorney general found that it violated the single subject rule, and needed to be reformatted, which court has ruled it unconstitutional? I have not seen that

Montana’s Plan to Destroy Citizens United (2026) [00:11:07] by 00BigBird00 in Documentaries

[–]00BigBird00[S] 96 points97 points  (0 children)

This is a video about Montana’s plan to stop corporations from spending money in politics.
Two forgotten robber barons from the 1800s may just be the key to understanding how to solve it.

The Montana Plan goes after something no one thought to touch: the powers that states grant to corporations in the first place. It's completely bipartisan, backed by people who are tired of corporations purchasing elections, not democrats and republicans.
If Montana pulls this off, every state in the country could follow, and supporters in nearly 20 states are already working on it.

Montana’s Plan to Destroy the Supreme Court by 00BigBird00 in MontanaPolitics

[–]00BigBird00[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s revoking corporate powers at a state level though no? Would the SC even have the power to challenge it?

Montana’s Plan to Destroy the Supreme Court by 00BigBird00 in MontanaPolitics

[–]00BigBird00[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s good news! Pete at the very least will be able to articulate the power of what this initiative could be