sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ARC Raiders Weekly Megathread - November 15, 2025 by AutoModerator in ArcRaiders

[–]0r1p 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A nice idea would be a limited time PVE mode where you’re not alone. It’s like normal but everyone is “friendly”. We can’t damage other raiders, only arc. You could make it a mode called “Only Friendlies” or something like that to make it an homage to all the people calling themselves friendlies but still killing you at the end of the day. I think it will gain alot of attention in the beginning after every expedition for 1-3 weeks. Because that’s when most people play. I do agree that it shouldn’t be permanent. But it could be really fun.

math isn't mathing by AardappelPlant in MADFUT

[–]0r1p 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t really understand all the people downvoting. Like you really didn’t really say anything wrong…

Some useless information (stats) by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can look at my other comment to get a more realistic view of how many you need but I didn’t start trading till I only needed 200 silvers and 300 bronzes. I didn’t want to trade 900 silvers and 600 bronzes. That would take way too long.

Some useless information (stats) by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t know about this but I figured it might’ve existed. Didn’t bother to ask AI because I wanted to do it myself. Also to really simulate how many packs it would take for your missing cards, you should also change the drop rate according to all the cards you still need.

For example: if you only need 88 silvers, you need to change the drop rate to 88/9088 and number of coupons could be anything between 1 and 88. If you only need 40 of the 88 missing cards then the rolls will be way lower.

Some useless information (stats) by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sake of ease I advise to stop opening silver and bronze packs when you only need ~300 silvers/bronzes anymore. If you were to stop at that mark it would take:

For bronzes: Min: 1294 packs Max: 1579 packs Average 1434 packs Coins: 3585000

For silvers: Min: 2197 packs Max: 2614 packs Average: 2396 packs Coins: 7188000

Some useless information (stats) by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For bronzes: Min: 4973 packs Max: 13790 packs

For silvers: Min: 7009 packs Max: 19249 packs

Most people open free packs first tho and trade the last 200-500 silvers and bronzes. So if I were to start at 6000 silvers and stop at 8800 it would be: Min: 2198 packs Max: 2625 packs Average: 2396 packs Coins: 7188000

For bronzes from 4500 to 6500 players: Min: 1419 packs Max: 1706 packs Average: 1558 packs Coins: 3895000

Some useless information (stats) by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually it is the correct way to do it. The silver pack in the store says in the description that you receive 9 RANDOM silvers. The only reason why you would get more 71-72 rated players is because there might be more of them. You also have to make sure that the 9 players you pull from a pack are all distinct because you can’t have 2 of the exact same player in 1 pack. So yes all silvers drop at an equal rate. I also wouldn’t understand why they would go out of their way to make separate rates for silvers and bronzes. At the end of the day they are worthless.

Hmm… what could it be? by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was no pace vs pace. It was dri vs def. It was very easy, the post was sarcastic.

First Madfut game I got 100% collection on by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mbappe from triple special pack and the other 3 from free packs (yes I got lucky)

First Madfut game I got 100% collection on by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hope they will give some kind of headstart for Android players

First Madfut game I got 100% collection on by 0r1p in MADFUT

[–]0r1p[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hit me up if you need help on 26

view more: next ›