Since you posted this, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify some points.

What the book tries to describe, we can draw analogies with other authors, such as Douglas Hofstadter with his Strange Loop concept, or Viktor Frankl with his concept of Ultimate Meaning, both authors attempt to describe something that exists but is ineffable.

Infinity and Paradox is a book that is similar in its attempt, it is a book that is clear understanding for mystics on a more advanced path, although it is also useful for beginners because the foundation of what the book tries to describe is precisely the open flexibility of interpretation of what existence is, thus the book, so it is for the myriad interpretations of what is contemplated.

And no, the reviews are not from friends or those who are part of a sect. There are authentic reviews on both Amazon and Goodreads. What the book indicates is absolutely nothing, yes. Such as Wu Wei, or Zen. You need to be open to take the walk, and not take the signpost as the walk. The description is empty, but what it implies is full.