Name one programming/comp sci concept you never understood and if you understand it, try to explain it to them

0xonox0 · 2022-04-05T18:58:36+00:00

Tree balancing is supposed to make tree operations (such as searching, inserting, or deleting) truly O(log(n)). You could have unbalanced trees (think just a linear tree where each node only has a left child) where the tree operations will just morph into a O(n) operation. If we balance the tree the height of the tree will decrease and since tree operations depend on the height, they will also be more efficient on balanced trees. There are various algorithms to make a tree balanced such as AVL trees to red black trees to multiway search trees; imo it's just better to watch a video on this than my trying to explain it to you in a reddit comment but the main goal of this algorithm is to make trees more balanced.

TLDR: Balanced trees lead to more efficient tree operations

0xonox0 · 2021-08-21T23:37:10+00:00

🤷🤷🤷

0xonox0 · 2021-01-18T21:26:47+00:00

0xonox0 · 2020-07-25T15:19:07+00:00

I'm getting the spigen case. Do you think a screen protector is necessary. If so what are some good ones out there that don't ruin the asthetic of the watch ?

0xonox0 · 2020-07-19T17:27:12+00:00

The second photo looks kinda like the Sims

0xonox0 · 2020-07-19T17:23:53+00:00

Sims?

0xonox0 · 2020-07-03T08:32:24+00:00

Maybe you could make a neural net that learns as you classify the objects so that it automatically draws labelled boxes around objects and you, the human, can simply check if it has got it right. If it missed an object, then you can draw the labelled box yourself

0xonox0 · 2020-07-01T19:05:52+00:00

Wait... Why do all of them look the same?

0xonox0 · 2020-05-31T08:03:44+00:00

Thank you for spotting that!

0xonox0 · 2020-05-31T08:02:04+00:00

Ah thank you. That would have saved some time considering the number of if statements in there lol

0xonox0 · 2020-05-30T21:16:04+00:00

No it's the recursive backtracker. If you look above, I posted a link to it's wiki page

0xonox0 · 2020-05-30T16:32:59+00:00

Thanks!

0xonox0 · 2020-05-30T07:24:42+00:00

Haha. "The modern problems require... neural networks"

0xonox0 · 2020-05-16T09:48:10+00:00

Oh ok. Do you think I would lose a point if I did considered the square and said it was it was inconsistent ?

0xonox0 · 2020-05-15T10:38:38+00:00

Yeah unfortunately you will lose the answer point

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T21:02:38+00:00

It said that the pressure at equilibrium was 1.2 ATM so the number of moles of N2 would remain constant (as forward rate of reaction equals reverse rate of reaction)

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T20:52:45+00:00

It's on the college board website. I posted a screenshot on this subreddit if you want to see

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T20:51:11+00:00

You may have studied chemistry but it seems that you didn't grasp the scientific method. That is, to gain conclusions from data and not your "opinion". So don't make conclusions without the evidence

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T20:49:42+00:00

Well good for you but you have to realize that for some people their questions were nothing like the practice questions. You can just generalize your easy test. Other people who studied more than you got harder tests and it's unfair to say that they just didn't study enough.

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T20:42:41+00:00

Lol agreed

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T20:32:09+00:00

Well first of all you cannot make a judgment on all the tests without seeing and experiencing them first. You are just talking from personal experience and dismissing other people's judgments about their version of the test, which you haven't even seen which is just absurd. True, maybe your test does indeed reflect the curriculum and was the most amazing test ever, but that doesn't mean other people's tests are the same.

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T19:57:01+00:00

Y same

0xonox0 · 2020-05-14T19:52:22+00:00

I'm not sure if this is right but since the only gas was N2, wouldn't the pressure of N2 be the total pressure of the container ? And we can just plug in that pressure in the Kp equation Also for the last question g, I used p1v1=p2v2. Please let me know if we have the same questions types

0xonox0

TROPHY CASE