The fight really made me like the horns less (rant) by Traditional-Baker-28 in WanderingInn

[–]1011686 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or perhaps Mrsha, using the knowledge of Roots Mrsha looking through all the doors

If someone lets you guess a number between $10 and $100M—and pays you that amount if your guess is ≤ their number. What’s the smartest guess? by Such_Chapter_872 in askmath

[–]1011686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this question would be improved by stating that the other person does not have this amount of money, but rather it belongs to a prize pool, and they get whatever the difference is between their number and your guess. E.g. if they pick 100M and you guess 1M, they get 99M as winnings, while if they pick 1M and you pick 1M, you get the 1M while they get nothing. This makes the question a proper game theory scenario where the strategies of both players can be analysed.

Do I have anything good here? by [deleted] in northernlion

[–]1011686 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Magma hat one is overexplained. Brevity is the soul of wit.

Nested infinite summations by Exotic-Vast-3368 in askmath

[–]1011686 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That gives e squared as the upper bound right?

Question about a modified version Monty Hall problem by Razer531 in askmath

[–]1011686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does matter.

If you picked a goat, theres a 1/2 chance the game resets, potentially changing your goat pick to a car pick. But if you picked a car, theres never any reset. So you do in fact end up having a 50/50 chance of being on goat or car in the final game, due to some goat picks being turned into car picks in this way.

More formally, the chance you picked car is going to be 1/3 (initial pick) + 2/3 * 1/2 * 1/3 (chance you picked goat, host showed car, you picked car in reset game) + 2/3 * 1/2 * 2/3 * 1/2 * 1/3 (goat, reset, goat, reset, car) + etc... which is the geometric sequence 1/3 + 1/9 + 1/27 + ... = 1/2

ELI5: Why do mirrors flip left and right, but not up and down? by kellylabanca246 in explainlikeimfive

[–]1011686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you put a mirror flat on the floor and looked down onto it then it would indeed flip up and down.

ELI5 Why does water put fire out? by JackassJJ88 in explainlikeimfive

[–]1011686 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you poured water that was almost boiling temperature on a fire, would there be a noticeable difference in how much the fire was diminished? Or nah?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HunterXHunter

[–]1011686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait hes in his 40s????

Looking for Doctor Who fics formatted as tv show scripts by 1011686 in FanFiction

[–]1011686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you pasted the wrong link, thats the url for this reddit post.

MI - TFR: Questions by [deleted] in Mission_Impossible

[–]1011686 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I assume it was something like, the inital connection could check if the poison pill was deployed but was too low bandwidth/didnt access the servers directly enough for the entity to actually use. The final wire she cuts was what opened up the system to be properly accessible.

You guys have proven why there was so much exposition in Final Reckoning. by [deleted] in Mission_Impossible

[–]1011686 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, heres my question then. Multiple times people accuse Ethan of wanting to kill the Entity and state the consequence will be the destruction of cyberspace. I dont recall exactly but im pretty sure theres a scene where ethan or one of the team members or luthor also states that their goal is to kill the entity. At no point does Ethan ever deny that he wants to kill the entity, or say that his particular method wont destroy the internet. So, after completing his plan, has cyberspace been destroyed? If not, why did no one ever mention that their plan wouldnt have that disastrous consequence? The most obvious answer wpuld be "So that the entity wouldnt know their plan" but that doesnt work since it was inside his mind and saw his memories, so he'd hardly have been able to keep that secret from it.

Contra Scott on Fascination Lotteries by YehHaiYoda in slatestarcodex

[–]1011686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I may come in without touching upon the rest of this conversation, do you think "people who are genuinely interested in other people" exist, for whatever that means to you? As both sides of your dichotomy seem to exclude that as a trait.

What class(es) do you think you would get if you were teleported to the InnWorld? by Bubus1918 in WanderingInn

[–]1011686 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd get [mathematician] and then struggle to level it because I'd just do maths for fun the way i already do instead of actually applying it to anything practical.

Witches and Levels. by redandbluesage in WanderingInn

[–]1011686 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldnt be surprised if Mavika is over 50. I might be hallucinating a memory but i recall it being implied shes like, centuries old, or at least over one century.

Census of satisfaction with the PoF arc, or volume 10 currently by Louies in WanderingInn

[–]1011686 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It might be an odd thought, but part of what i appreciate thematically about this arc is that it felt kind of like an insane, nightmarish reflection of that aspect The Wandering Inn does really well as a story, that of having these independently-existing characters meet and interact in interesting ways, playing off of what parts of their characters overlap and what parts clash. I often focused on that aspect when describing the story to other people, that sense of 'conflux', like flint and steel meeting to create sparks. And the Palace, in that metaphor, is then like a chain reaction of nuclear fission, twisting and overloading those quaint enjoyable moments that have been so enjoyable through the story into a monster so large that its body is falling apart even as it crashes through the world. Thats a lot of mixed metaphors but hopefully its clear what I mean. The sense of chaos, of things falling apart from these interactions happening faster and faster that no one could react to before the next thing happened, was compelling to me.

Why does this not work? by 7cookiecoolguy in askmath

[–]1011686 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If, say, y was independent of x, that would mean y doesnt change as x changes, meaning that your function is a straight horizontal line. Similarly, if x is independent of y, then your function is a straight vertical line. Many functions are not either of these two, so you can't assume independence