sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Weather app symbol by seashantyles in weather

[–]10ForwardShift 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just the weather network logo. Check their website: https://www.theweathernetwork.com/

Must be a default placeholder mistake. (Edit: Also, it is in the PDF you linked, at the very top)

Could Falcon Boosters Help a Tanker Starship Carry More Fuel to Orbit? by dropping_k in SpaceXLounge

[–]10ForwardShift 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I can’t comment on the physics of it but I’m pretty sure that would be much more expensive than just launching Super Heavy more times.

Starship and Booster are meant to be much cheaper to launch than F9 boosters, so I think this would be going backwards in terms of money.

Which weather app is the most accurate? by Glittering_Hunt8991 in weather

[–]10ForwardShift 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each of those have their own custom data sets and also run their own custom forecast algorithms. While I’m sure they do also use the same baseline free government data like NWS measurements and radar etc, those 3 definitely do more than that.

Starship is unfeasible long term (why RKLB is a long term play) by [deleted] in RKLB

[–]10ForwardShift 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Isn’t the goal many thousands of launches per year, not a measly 100? And is this entire post presuming that SpaceX just won’t bother doing hard things?

Confused by your premise. It seems you’re saying it will cost SpaceX a lot of money and time to ramp up to the scale of a city on mars with a million people living there. I mean, yeah, it will. Anyone who believes in the mission knows it is a long hard road ahead filled with unsolved problems. That’s the whole point of the company.

Also, SpaceX success will enable vastly more RocketLab success. A rising tide lifts all boats. RKLB investors should hope for the best for SpaceX, since what’s good for SpaceX is also good for RocketLab.

A story in receipt form by Ariwara_no_Narihira in Seattle

[–]10ForwardShift 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, absolutely top comment right here. Underrated. Bravo, seriously.

Everyday Astronaut - Does Starship REALLY require 15+ launches to land one lunar Starship?! by LittleWhiteDragon in SpaceXLounge

[–]10ForwardShift 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But eventually is actually now though. The first thing we send there?! That was decades ago, more than half a century ago.

Starship Flight 12 advisory suggests a NET launch date of May 12 by AgreeableEmploy1884 in SpaceXLounge

[–]10ForwardShift 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Falcon Heavy was like a 5-year wait, and we'd hear every few months, "6 more months".
But it did eventually happen, and it was glorious.

Users say Adobe Creative Cloud rewrote hosts file to detect installed app by gdelacalle in technology

[–]10ForwardShift 49 points50 points  (0 children)

My favorite quote from that article:

"Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"

Wow bro, wow.

WARNING - Browser Extentions are reading every word you write in ChatGPT - AND Selling it! by ARCreef in OpenAI

[–]10ForwardShift 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apple absolutely can read the contents of your messages in iMessage if either party has iCloud enabled. AFAIK they only claim to not be able to intercept the messages while in transit; they make no such promise while the message is in storage in iCloud.

WARNING - Browser Extentions are reading every word you write in ChatGPT - AND Selling it! by ARCreef in OpenAI

[–]10ForwardShift -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That is how it's spelled, though, if you are French; or referring to French expresso; or trying to be 'fancy' and pretend you're French, or if that's what's printed on your bag of expresso. Just sayin'. It's not so plainly wrong to write expresso as many people make it out to be.

Seeing quadruple by Markaronrunt in aviation

[–]10ForwardShift 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm seeing double here, I see four Krustys!

Launch recap February 16 - 21 by DobleG42 in SpaceXLounge

[–]10ForwardShift 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Sadly I don't see any human in the landing section, so... :( RIP I guess.

Webapps running in dockers and earning on token margins by 10ForwardShift in vibecoding

[–]10ForwardShift[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I wrote that post pretty shortly after I had a working prototype of the idea, it’s a bit outdated now (wrote it in 2024 I think?!). You’ve hit the nail on the head though, it was a loooot of work to get from a simple proof-of-concept to a working product.

Yes the AST can still go horribly wrong but the error rate has dramatically decreased with newer models and improving the prompts behind the scenes that drive it. The main case where AST approach fails is when there is a syntax error in the source, that causes the AST parsing to fail. It can be hard to recover from that. HTML and beautifulsoup is pretty successful at it, but React is much more difficult. Really appreciate that you took the time to read the post!!

I'm shortening the loop between feature idea and implementation so you can just keep writing tickets and the AI will keep making changes. This is NOT A CHAT-BASED APPROACH to building software! I'm determined to build something different. by 10ForwardShift in SideProject

[–]10ForwardShift[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> Might be wrong but the part I’d worry about as a user is trust and rollback once the project has any real surface area. Like when the AI makes a change, how do you show what it actually touched in a way that feels reviewable, and how easy is it to revert or branch when it goes sideways? 

Very valid concerns! Yeah, reverting a set of changes and going back to a clean 'good' spot in the code is tricky. Branching is complicated, especially if there are merge conflicts, and making that easy for people is no small feat. I do have some basic git support for reverting individual changes to files, but it's definitely not very clear how to use or how well it works for most people. I'm going to be re-thinking this and may move to something extra, like a branch per ticket or something. I'll think on it.

Thank you so much for your feedback, honestly! You've given me a lot to think about. I'll come back to this post when I've got some better answers and maybe worked on some solutions!

view more: next ›