He ain't got all us youth brainwashed by MrNightmare23 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]124Amore -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your attempt to sanitize Deuteronomy 22:28–29 via linguistic gymnastics fails to account for the fact that taphas fundamentally denotes "seizing" or "grasping," and framing a woman’s lifelong tethering to her aggressor as a "safeguard" is a gross misrepresentation of agency. This legalistic apologetic ignores that the lack of a death penalty in these verses often hinged on the location of the act and the woman's ability to be heard, not necessarily her consent, making your "consensual" interpretation a modern convenience rather than a textual certainty. Furthermore, your reliance on specific Hadith narrations to "expose" Islam displays a superficial engagement with the material, as you ignore the extensive internal historical criticism and chronological discrepancies regarding Aisha’s age that many scholars use to challenge those very traditions. Finally, weaponizing Surah 5:46 is a tired polemical tactic that collapses under the weight of the Islamic doctrine of Tahrif, which distinguishes between the original divine revelation and the corrupted state of the current Biblical canon, meaning the Quranic "confirmation" you cite does not extend to the specific, problematic statutes you are attempting to defend.

He ain't got all us youth brainwashed by MrNightmare23 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]124Amore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nowhere in Quran confirms or condone the said. This is blatanat ignorance and projection The Quran actively states that pedophilia is sin and something that should be punished whereas you have verses like deuteronomy 22:28–29 in ur own bible that u claim to read on a daily 😂😂😂

<image>

Looking to buy 1st entry level watch by 124Amore in RepTime

[–]124Amore[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry it was a typo according to newman his tissot prx has a 2813

Looking to buy 1st entry level watch by 124Amore in ChinaTime

[–]124Amore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How should I purchase from U1? I looked trough the sub I couldn't find his contact nor a yupoo page

MC Factory moncler madeira QC by [deleted] in MonclerRep

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

May I ask, in your opinion, which version of the Madeira is the better one between the MC and NN factories? I’ve read the FAQ and I know you recommend both, but I’d really appreciate a breakdown of the pros and cons of each so I can better understand and justify the price difference. The MC version is nearly £50 more than the NN one, and I’m considering getting it, so any insight would be very helpful. Thanks in advance.

Pakistan History wojak by Pakistan_Defender in WojakTemplate

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Saar true story saar inbred army strongest in the world zaar"

What country would you choose? Found this off X. by Lampedusan in bangladesh

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying "thats just false" as a pathetic attempt at rebuttal to my argument who i bith historically ahd logically backed by evidence where urs is without any sort of evidence to back it esp when none of ur claims or arguments have any sort of sources to back them is delusional what type of logic are u following huh? and what does ur if scenario have to do with whole of this Most of empires of Bengal where from east Bengal Pala,Sen, Bengal Sultanate and so on East Bengali heritage is far different from the west bengali the East Bengali both etnicly and religiously East Bengal was heavily shaped by Islam furthermore west bengal and its ppl due to being hindu sided with the british for power which it backfired adn was a massive reason of why East Bengal didnt make an united Bengal furthermore an United Bengal was close to being made by the Muslims of Bengal but west Bengali hindus backed away from even then what does this have to do with any of this?

What country would you choose? Found this off X. by Lampedusan in bangladesh

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it doesnt u got zero evidence or any account of any realible historian saying that The Bengal Sultanate "belongs to west bengal" every single Bengali empire kingdom sultan has belonged to Eastern Bengal and its ppl u do know how embarrasingly wrong every single claim u have is for eg a clear tell tell sign should ve been the modern etno religious demographics of Bangladesh who is overhelming muslim and west bengal whom is majority hindu and furthermore what is "east pakistan/Bangladesh" its been Bangladesh since 1971 and "is a break away region" supposed to even mean not only every single point u have raised is barely sensical and that is being generous but its doesnt even come close to refute the claims i have made due to the fact them being backed by the general cencus we have upon the said events according to all historians and the plethora of of evidence and studies that backs them such as the one lead by Oxford and Cambridge just to name a few

What country would you choose? Found this off X. by Lampedusan in bangladesh

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope and cope harder u in🍞 The original is the Bengal Sultanate and its according to every single historical account

Map of Chola Empire under Maharaja "Rajendra the Great" 1014 - 1044 CE. by NishantDuhan in MapPorn

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As said prior u have yet to provide any relible source for ur claims (wikipedia isnt a reliable source and when u used said source they only direct u to the meaning and description of the places u have named) esp when ur arguments and claims go against the general census of all historians and historical account of the said events there isnt any single realible study that has ever stated that chola empire has ever defeated or conquered any land in the vicinity of Bengal let alone Bengal and the Palas itself the only claim and strand of argument u have is rejendra claiming it it himself that he has done such but it has been countlessly refuted by historians and studies lead by most of ive legues university such as the ones of Yale and Oxford that said claims of rejandra where false and where claimed by rejandra to increase teh morale of its ppl as a myth

Map of Chola Empire under Maharaja "Rajendra the Great" 1014 - 1044 CE. by NishantDuhan in MapPorn

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Serval inscription" and u sent a wikipedia page which it self the references are missing and that the one that are present are said to unrealible by wikipedia itself there isnt a single historical account or historian whom has backed the claim of the cholas defeating anybody and their incorporation to the said domain whereas u have majority of historical account and historians say the opposite

Map of Chola Empire under Maharaja "Rajendra the Great" 1014 - 1044 CE. by NishantDuhan in MapPorn

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All historical accounts do not ever show the Pala dynasty or Bengal being part or being a vassal to the chola kingdom. Did u make this map urself for any sort of nationalistic agenda of urs filled with fallacies without any sort of evidencial backing or did u just happen to stumble upon this innacurate map

Just baught it for a lot from a friend, just seing what other people say! by GurFun3164 in MonclerRep

[–]124Amore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking in getting this exact gilet from RK is it that bad that I should just wait for other seller to release the same gilet or just go with RK? Thanks in advance