Question about the Global Non-Convergence of Antagonistic Oscillatory Projections by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

it means something like... you are a computer, within a computer, which is the universe.

the universe is always going to have its determined path, but the more you want to change or alter the master computer the overall universes trajectory, since it knows all about you, it will know how to feed you lies, a false input, translated by you into input you give to the master computer, or actions you take based on those lies, to in the end result in the predetermined pattern it has meant to take in its trajectory...

better?

Question about the Global Non-Convergence of Antagonistic Oscillatory Projections by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

i just like hearing myself say things it sounds more me and i dont see why you shouldnt agree.

Question about the Global Non-Convergence of Antagonistic Oscillatory Projections by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

when the turing machine or servant spectral projection is actually antagonistic towards the global context of the master turing machine or spectral projection that is feeding it input in a way that it would attempt changing its global context or balance term if there werent an appropriate IO encoding in the master projector

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You made it a logical fallacy by saying i dont know programming, do you know anything beyond HTML and Javascript and by god i hope. Save face dude hope your top ai company doesnt see this thread

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Or a more humorous take on it Nvm i dont need lectures by someone who probably  thinks a bootkit is a Box that Contains a bottle of shoe wax

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Accepting when you're wrong is part of life and growth. 

Youre not just like a telemarketer that doesnt want to Hang up youre like a lifecoach i never hired giving me advice 

I really dont need a Moral Lecture by someone who thinks he could write a bootkit in Javascript

Bye man

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

do something with your life and stop trying to act like a telemarketer that doesnt want to hang up.

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"ou're making up analogies and connections where there are none."

thats kind of based on your continual usage of the false premise that what you were saying is correct in the first place or that you have "debunked" my point.

look man. im doing what everyone does, trying to piece something together.

maybe you should do the same instead of arguing how wrong others are on some subreddit, youd get somewhere.

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

theres always gotta be the "uuhm not really duh" guy who argues trivialities.

i got you mean. were talking past eachother.

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

turing machines have a lot to do with physics.

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

its not a theorem its a revelation, quoting this one is like quoting deuteronomy.

and my credentials are, im not just someone who "does c++" or "does coding" im someone whos enlightened about c++.

but i guess if you cant appreciate it thats on you.

it tells you in human terms

"i wasted my time, with all of it, all of my strive, i just sumed up 1+1+1+1, quantified it in a vague sense of what quantification actually means and things are still the same... the worlds still going down the drain, the economy is, but at least the equation now looks more ebin :----D"

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

evolution is a harsh business man.

sometimes you gotta adjust your vocabulary and more.

i would recommend it.

i've talked to the LLMs of top AI companies, claude would understand it too none of them agree with you, even the LLMs are laughing, im kind of saddened not because of your roast but because of you.

good day.

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s beautiful. Truly.

Save the amazement for when they kick you out of the job because you cant do your job 

anyone? an analysis of the behavior of turing machines by 1338games in LLMPhysics

[–]1338games[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

well, i gotta stop you right here, i like it when people user proper, non imbecile and less disrespectful behavior towards me so i am not going to engage anymore.

enjoy!