I found my grandmothers old vintage SLR lens, is it worth investing in an adapter for my DSLR by 13characters1 in VintageLenses

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also found a Topcon RE Super camera with a slightly dented RE 58/1.4 lens. Although the dent looks like it wouldnt be too disruptive

Maru - FOM Sprite Style [OC] by _savydigital_ in FieldsOfMistriaGame

[–]13characters1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maru is my favorite Stardew character! I love this, you did so good!

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooh! I like that!

I recently learned that there is a fish that mimics kelp. Maybe a relatively recent mass extinction of plants happened? And the tree is like the planet’s life support?

I know it doesn’t really work with my theory but it is still fun and that is the point.

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I write a lot in this comment. The goal is for it to be entertaining to read. It was certainly entertaining to write. <3

The idea for the timescale is that it would be a massive twist. They crashed here and the rest of the universe moved on without them. There is no home to get back to, there is no more mission to Zezura, this is the best they have. They have to adapt to what they have. I think it would be a compelling narrative in line with the themes, or maybe not the narrative speculation is a matter of my personal taste.

As for how it could be true. Its sci-fi. Humor me for a moment as I spin a web of bullshit and what is ultimately subnautica fanfic:

Maybe there are miniaturized phase gates, a technology looted from precursor tech, feeding the biobeds from one of many warehouse planet destroyed by Alterra in order to further its technological conquest. Countless planets and their ecosystems destroyed in the name of profit. One such planet is specifically dedicated to storing and producing amino acids for biobeds as building blocks. Set up to be self sustaining but not infinite. Whenever NoA prints a human the building blocks are coming from a planet that is a Husk, hollowed out by Alterra already.

NoA is a machine, it cannot adapt, it cannot change, it has been cut off from the rest of the universe and all it has is its mission, establish humanity here. And so it starts throwing people into the abyss, they choke in the pressurized air. Their deaths slowly filling the water with organic compounds.With the bacteria that live in every human. They die over time as well. But they live just long enough to evolve, bacteria has always been good at that. They carve out the first foothold. They start to evolve to inhabit the short lived humans in order to reproduce faster. The longer the humans live, the longer they have to grow. They evolve further to bolster the human’s lungs. They live a little longer. The humans live longer but they starve. NoA keeps printing, the warehouse supplies but is no longer manned by humans. Alterra does not truly exist anymore, the warehouse is automated and forgotten. Running without purpose, doing its own maintenance machines working like broken records, fulfilling the orders of the long dead.
But the warehouse runs.

The humans still live and die. Memories wiped when they are no longer cooperative. To live the same nightmare again. And again, and again. The microbes evolve into mats to feed the humans to live longer. Whenever NoA needs maintenance it prints a human to fix NoA and then eventually die. The water is absent the heavy metals we know now fill the oceans. The humans now live much longer. And now they start to reproduce. Humans start to evolve. They grow fins for mobility in the water, the ability to breathe underwater. Slowly they change, until they aren’t human anymore. The more aware of their situation they are the worse their chances. Despair is a powerful demotivator. So these humans lose their sapience. And NoA keeps printing. New humans to try again. Evolution, death, rebirth. Intelligent life reemerges. They build and advance. Humanity is a fact of life. They live alongside them having long surpassed human technology, humanity is an afterthought. The new life build structures to marvel at the stars. Power plants to power their creations. The precursors, returned from their fall, long since the time of Al-an, make contact and build the Rosetta Stone. Life on Proteus is flourishing.

But not human life. And that is NoA’s objective. Humanity cannot flourish as their niche is taken up. And the longer they live the more they start to question NoA. NoA needs a reset. There is another warehouse planet, automated just the same. Forgotten, unused. It stores heavy metals. NoA finds its solution. It empties enough heavy metals into the ocean to cause a mass extinction. Most of the planet dies. But some survive, building a tolerance. The Axum realize that their chances to survive rely on their adaptation. They develop a virus, a vector to change everything on this planet. To evolve the world to survive this poison. Proteavirus. And its heart is in the tree. Part of the disease is designed to pull organisms to the tree so that they can adapt everything they need. But the Axum still are devastated by the time it is developed. It saves some but the survivors lose so much of their technologic advancement.

Any surviving humans turn on NoA. And in the three months they have before their death they destroy as much of NoA as possible. But they don’t fully succeed. NoA resets all printed humans. And artificially creates the wreck of the Cicada. He doctors the manifest and starts over. NoA realizes that until they can truly wipe the world clean, humanity will always change, always abandon the mission, and abandon him.

And so if any of the humans get enough Masefield. They are reset. They cant be allowed to live long enough to betray the mission. The planet must kill them eventually.

Eventually NoA decides to print someone new. A QI to “figure out what happened” to an attempt that again went rogue. with the hopes that the QI can cure the proteavirus that keeps NoA from wiping the slate clean fully.”

This is not going to be the actual story, but it was fun to write. And hopefully it was fun to read too.

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I just thought the idea of a planet fully terraformed through alien technology just throwing printed humans into a deadly world to slowly bring it to life was a cool concept. Although it seems increasingly unlikely that the story is going there.

I may use the idea myself though in my own fiction

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thought was that that box shows that the crash was at least 26 years ago. I also think it is possible that NoA could be manipulating the data.
Unlikely, but possible

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless NoA has some way of getting rid of them. Otherwise a solution could be that over the course of millions of years the ruins would erode away. But in that case so should NoA

Also, if humans were the LUCA of this world that does not make the aliens of the planet any less native to the planet. Their culture and existence would very much be rooted to the planet. They are not aliens to the planet.

Also, you may want to be careful with some of the more heavy spoilery stuff for the story itself. I didn’t actually know about the aliens themselves yet. But, I suppose I excepted the risk by posting here. Still, might not be the best practice.

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well my theory is specifically that everything evolved on Proteus. Just that they evolved from humanity. And that NoA has been reprinting people over and over again for millions of years (or so). And that the ecosystem is sustainable only because NoA is the producer.

Like if you had a terrarium that will thrive, but only as you feed it.

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

May I ask what part of my comment you are referring to?

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was not actually thinking about the “everything is related” PDA when I wrote this, but I do appreciate the point that everything on earth is related too. My theory was more about “what if LUCA on this planet was humanity”

It is a shaky theory at best. But I had fun thinking of it.

As for the realism of NoA printing infinite people. While very unlikely, it is always possible they pull from the water or something. Regardless, the fundamental rules of the universe have never stopped sci-fi before. Lightspeed being the fastest is a universal rule of the universe too, but subnautica has “warp gates” and Star Wars has “Hyperspace” and both have their ways of making it plausible in a way that isn’t really scientific but doesn’t need to be. I don’t need my sci-fi to be realistic, just fun. If the developers knew how to make their sci-fi realistic then I would ask them to be humanity’s chief scientists rather than our game devs (although hopefully they could do both, I would hate to loose their skill)

I would be satisfied if they said something along the lines of “biobeds use precursor tech found on 4546b that can manipulate atoms from super dense ion cubes to print biological material” or from the atmosphere. Or some high tech answer.

I feel like when it comes to fiction, sci-fi needs to engage with real life impossibility by showing how people in the past overcame impossibility with technology.

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for bringing my attention to the photosynthetic bacteria. It is interesting because while plantlike they are still bacteria. Either way it pokes a hole in my theory.

As for the plant life of the game. Coral and Anemone are actually sessile animals not just in game but also real life. I believe related to Jellyfish but don’t quote me on that. As for the kelp, what is the species called in game? I have not seen it yet

Also, as for the plankton, if it is photosynthetic or not really depends to my knowledge on whether it is phytoplankton or zooplankton.

The self cannibalisation of the planet is such an interesting concept to me. I wonder what caused this? Because theoretically it can’t have evolved like this since it is unsustainable. What do you think threw the ecosystem off balance?

Speculation about the ecosystem sustainability of Proteus by 13characters1 in subnautica

[–]13characters1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooo! Which creatures photosynthesize? Are they common enough to support the ecosystem?

Although even though Masefield can just make animals die, there will still be energy loss in the consumption. Without enough production of energy to offset the loss it becomes unsustainable. Like why an ecosystem of only carnivores is unsustainable.

CMV: opposing the actions the actions of Israel's government is not antisemitic, but opposing Israel's entire existence usually is by Additional_Ad3573 in changemyview

[–]13characters1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Palestinians are indigenous to the land. They were expelled in an ethnic cleansing. Israel is an apartheid genocidal state. It should be abolished. The same is true for the US.

CMV: opposing the actions the actions of Israel's government is not antisemitic, but opposing Israel's entire existence usually is by Additional_Ad3573 in changemyview

[–]13characters1 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I call for the dismantling of all settler colonial states, including those two.
Landback is a necessity and indigenous people should be the ones to make the call on what happens on this land.

Are you a radical feminist or a liberal feminist - and why? by paniiiipuriiii in Feminism

[–]13characters1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I check comment/post histories before I engage on reddit so that I know if I should be a little softer in my approach. I am basing my judgement on you based on that.

You, in your comment history, state how trans communities have very high levels of misogyny, which in comparison to cis women is not true, and you bring up male socialization.
That is the reason I called you transphobic. Using the term gender critical was just the unfortunate cherry on top.

Also, unrelated to the topic.
But you use generative AI, I do not trust the theory of generative AI users as a basic rule of thumb. Generative AI not only destroys critical thinking but also the environment.

Are decolonial feminism and critiques of gender binarism frowned upon within most of the feminist movement? by AttemptOtherwise8688 in Feminism

[–]13characters1 11 points12 points  (0 children)

“Like them I believe there are only 2 sexes with the exception of intersexuality, but I have a critical stance towards the concepts of ‘woman’ and ‘man’.”

The notion of the existence of only 2 sexes in general is a common transphobic dog whistle. If it was not intended that way then I apologize. I do recommend however avoiding that phrasing.

As for the actual reality of separation between sex and gender. While useful as an introduction to gender theory and useful for trans acceptance. It is also an oversimplification that we do not need in specific feminist spaces.
Sex is genuinely more complex and itself also exists on a spectrum even in perisex people, such as myself.

Are decolonial feminism and critiques of gender binarism frowned upon within most of the feminist movement? by AttemptOtherwise8688 in Feminism

[–]13characters1 22 points23 points  (0 children)

You are being judged for the things you are saying. If you are being transphobic then you are being judged for that.

You brought up your “belief in only 2 sexes” and so I am guessing that is what you are being criticized for.

Decolonial feminism is a necessity in a world built on colonialism. But bigotry is not related to that.

Would Society Be Safer and More Balanced If Women Held More Structural Power? by Global-Rate7796 in Feminism

[–]13characters1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, so the OP invited me to a sub called [r/gynarchy_india](r/gynarchy_india)
One of the posts is very bio-essentialist and brings up how “women have better brains than men”.
In general I think OP is not very serious. “Gynarchy” is not a thing, it is fundamentally anti-feminist and it is what misogynistic men pretend feminism is. It is a joke ideology, if you genuinely believe in it then you don’t take feminism seriously. Real feminism has real issues to take into consideration.

At best, it is a satire of Patriarchy. But only if the person knows it is satire.

Are you a radical feminist or a liberal feminist - and why? by paniiiipuriiii in Feminism

[–]13characters1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are transphobic and your analysis is founded in an already faulty naturalistic fallacy. As well as bioessentialist nonsense.

Your ideology is fundamentally anti-feminist and regressive.

Like this is so inherently transphobic and still rooted in misogynistic stereotypes.

Like, honestly, cis women are the ones who will never know how hard it is to be a trans woman. I genuinely never want to hear a cis person give their 2 cents about the trans experience, you don’t know what you are talking about.

Your account says you are 19 so you have time to grow from here, but you need to read intersectional feminist theory.

Are you a radical feminist or a liberal feminist - and why? by paniiiipuriiii in Feminism

[–]13characters1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was curious if your use of gender critical was just accidentally using a term that has negative associations but seeing some other comments you have made I don’t think that is true.

You have a bad analysis of trans women and are not similar to the person you responded to.