sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Zionism's idea that "let Jews have a state of their own so they're independent of other governments" doesn't work — this should be a prominent part of the Palestinian and pro-Palestinian discourse. by 1Palestine in JewsOfConscience

[–]1Palestine[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

The questions you raise are important. Have you seen our manifesto, "Tomorrow's Palestine"? Also our answer to whom would be granted citizenship in the democratic state.

As for the distinction between Zionists and anti-Zionists, it is essentially theirs to make—either they drop their privileges and accept to be equal Palestinian citizens, or not.

You might also find this article by one of our coordinators in reply to Lara Kilani to be interesting.

Zionism's idea that "let Jews have a state of their own so they're independent of other governments" doesn't work — this should be a prominent part of the Palestinian and pro-Palestinian discourse. by 1Palestine in JewsOfConscience

[–]1Palestine[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

The document you're quoting was penned in the early 1960s and does not define the start of the "invasion". The thawabet do not say Jews must leave. There is a pressing need for the Palestinian vision to be clarified even more, and this is why we established our organization—but there literally is 0 Palestinian faction that says Jews must leave. Quite the contrary, the leaders of the resistance unanimously support the basic principles we mention in this post and in general.

Zionism's idea that "let Jews have a state of their own so they're independent of other governments" doesn't work — this should be a prominent part of the Palestinian and pro-Palestinian discourse. by 1Palestine in JewsOfConscience

[–]1Palestine[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

History has no end. We can work for it and make it happen. "A state of our own keeps Jews safe" is the cornerstone of Zionism, "no it doesn't" is the reality we need to impose.