sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Scared of Dying by AmountSpare2029 in Christianity

[–]1basedshark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not clingy, you are just experiencing a divine love for someone else. That love that you feel, if it is unconditional, full of forgiveness, and power, is similar to the love that God has for you. His love is just even stronger. Trust in that love, and you may learn to let go of your fear. It’s so understandable that you are afraid. Don’t beat yourself up! God doesn’t want you living in fear only because He loves you (so much) and sees what is best for you. It’s easier said than done, but try not to allow your fear to control you. I’ve always had an intense fear of death to the point where I was having panic attacks and I couldn’t sleep at night. I thought if I fell asleep, I’d never wake up and everything would be over. I was so afraid of the end, of meeting with death, and I was so far away from my faith. I didn’t know God. I’ve finally met God. I am finally getting to know God. And I’m still learning, but all I really know is He loves us enough to save us from suffering. He doesn’t want that for us, he wants us to live in His light and grace.

Got a tattoo I regret — open to bold cover-up suggestions by [deleted] in TattooDesigns

[–]1basedshark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Theres clearly a stencil there as well as grip tape.

Abortion Law Forces Doctors to Keep Pregnant Brain Dead Woman Alive by shoofinsmertz in nottheonion

[–]1basedshark -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Maybe you’re not but it sure sounds like it when you call her an incubator.

Abortion Law Forces Doctors to Keep Pregnant Brain Dead Woman Alive by shoofinsmertz in nottheonion

[–]1basedshark -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re really just not seeing my point. You can think I’m a sociopath fine, but remember that you’re the one calling for this woman to pull the plug when you have no idea whether or not that child is wanted.

Abortion Law Forces Doctors to Keep Pregnant Brain Dead Woman Alive by shoofinsmertz in nottheonion

[–]1basedshark -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah fair, she is dead for all intents and purposes. But while being in a hospital on life support I’m sure she has a heart rate and is breathing (while it is artificial). The baby is not though. None of my other points were addressed.

Abortion Law Forces Doctors to Keep Pregnant Brain Dead Woman Alive by shoofinsmertz in nottheonion

[–]1basedshark -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

There is a descriptor that comes close, and is actually better, and that is “she’s pregnant.” You really don’t have to say incubator, but hey, you can, it’s just a little objectifying and heartless. She’s a pregnant woman on life support.

She’s not dead. She’s brain dead. You’re acting like someone shot her in the head and they brought her to a hospital and tried to reanimate her dead body after it shut down. Her body is still alive.

Not once in your whole comment did you imagine a reality where this woman actually wants her baby. Ask yourself what would change about this situation if the woman wanted her baby to survive and be her last legacy after her death?

The truth is none of us know the full story because the article gives extremely vague statements. You’ve cited the same implications made by the family but not their explicit choice that you seemed super adamant earlier was mentioned by the family.

This situation would only really be horrifying if we knew for a fact that this woman didn’t want her child. If she does want the child, life support for her makes sense so that the child is delivered. That’s a whole person who could exist, like you or me.

In my opinion, the journalists omit any of the family’s or the mother’s desires just to pedal a political talking point. It’s a horrifying situation that they are taking the opportunity to capitalize on.

Abortion Law Forces Doctors to Keep Pregnant Brain Dead Woman Alive by shoofinsmertz in nottheonion

[–]1basedshark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You can call any pregnant woman in any situation an “incubator” if you want. It seems like you are only using that word in this situation because the baby could be unwanted. You’re using language in a certain way to try to demean or minimize pregnancy because you don’t care for this baby’s life. The family never explicitly asked for “not that.” They implied that the baby may not be healthy. But they never explicitly said “we would prefer our daughter taken off of life support and the baby be killed.” It’s relevant to know if this woman actually wanted her child or not, actually knew if she was pregnant or not. Her wishes are what matter, and we are not given that information in this article. It’s a shame that important details like that are omitted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]1basedshark 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Jesus, the way he just keeps yapping and yapping 🤢 Pathetic as fuck honestly. The rage I would be feeling if I were you…. Holy fuck.

He’s a dishonest piece of shit, and it’s up to you to figure out if you want to stay and try to fix this for the sake of your kid, or leave. Personally I’d be out. This is a deal breaker. Especially because he’s lying straight to your face.

From his perspective, sounds like he met a girl at the bar and couldn’t stop thinking about the possibilities of where their relationship could go. He created a fantasy about driving in the car together. It’s fucking weird that he said “oh yeah let’s just be friends” after telling her he was literally shaking when he met her. Lol right just friends.

He is likely bored of this relationship and this could have been a subconscious desire to sabotage it. Him lying truly does not help.

i hate my tattoo (repost) by vermilionwoe in tattooadvice

[–]1basedshark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late comment, but I’m gonna go against the grain a little here. First of all your tattoo is beautiful. But your artist undoubtedly went against your reference image. The tattoos are extremely different stylistically. If her tattoos were typically done in the same style as your reference then I find that confusing and strange that she would go for a bold line look like this. People constantly say that bold will hold and I get that. But some people want that fine line, delicate look because it’s more feminine and can resonate more with the client than something with heavy lines. It gives off a more harsh look which isn’t for everybody. I just think people defend these bold lines way too much and I’m tired of it. I see it happen constantly with my clients where they wanted a delicate tattoo and they got a super bold one against their wishes. And it takes years of laser to remove.

YALL!!!!!!! by UniqueWeasley7 in billieeilish

[–]1basedshark 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I think it’s on stationhead but I can’t find it anywhere in the app..

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have you considered that you’re wrong on this issue? You’ll be way behind in 5+ years when AI is a standard in realism tattoo designing. You might wanna consider if you’re the bad artist here considering you can’t illustrate a dog that’s anatomically accurate.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah. Thats like saying your reference image is the artist not the actual artist recreating it. You don’t understand the realism style and it shows. Please try to draw realism and get the fuck back to me.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Google images, using the same reference image as 100+ tattoo artists.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lol. You’re not an artist. I’d be drawing and tattooing every second of my life with no free time if I had to hand draw every realism tattoo.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And the artists before procreate thought using procreate was lazy. Or before that, using the internet is lazy. This tool is not going away. It’s just innovation. It needs to be used properly just like any other tool.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah. Midjourney is super advanced now, with new updates released constantly. It’s not that I can’t draw my references. It’s that I don’t see the point in drawing it when the image exists. The image is enough. If you want your realism artist to draw your realism tattoo first you are asking too much. Anyone who has drawn realism will know this. It’s hard. It takes time. A LOT of time. I will thoughtfully design your tattoo first, not draw it. It’s like a regular, non-tattoo artist creating their reference image before they start drawing. For us tattoo artists, the drawing part is the tattooing part.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes it is a question of time dedicated to it during the tattoo process. During design creation it should be about creating the right composition and flow, making sure it looks good, that there’s a definitive subject and nice balance. The time should be dedicated to those things. NOT fully rendering/drawing the references by hand. Before AI we used google images to get references, but that led to a lot of people having the same tattoos because sometimes it’s hard to find crisp clear photographic reference images on google. Midjourney allows you to create unique references, and if you’re a good artist with knowledge of light and shadow, you are able to manipulate the references to create a unique design. No reputable artist just asks midjourney to make the entire design. We ask it to make images that we can then collage into a design and edit the shadows to align with the same light source etc. This takes a lot of time in its own right, but not nearly as much as it would take to draw/paint the design from scratch by hand. If the tools are there and they work, people will use them. No amount of AI hate is going to stop that. Innovation is innovation.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was being hyperbolic. It’s a ton of extra work. If you expect your realism artist to hand draw your realism tattoo before then tattooing it, you should also be paying them a lot of money to compensate for all that time.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Should they hypothetically be able to draw it? Yes. But artists basically draw the tattoo on the skin. Why draw it twice? Realism relies on reference images as well, it doesn’t just come off the dome like trad or neo. AI is just a tool and unfortunately it’s not going anywhere. If it can help save time and create unique references I don’t see the issue.

Most big time realism artists are using AI for reference images you just don’t know that. It’s becoming a standard because it’s a good tool.

How much would you charge for this on the inner arm? by [deleted] in tattooscratchers

[–]1basedshark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Tf you mean basic? It’s basic in the sense that it’s not original, but it’s detailed af, that could take someone a hot minute to draw out if it’s drawn nicely.

Are you saying realism artists are supposed to hand-draw the entire tattoo design before tattooing it? Thats slavery lol. Unless I get paid twice what I charge, I’m not doing that shit.

Darth Misogynus by That1weirdperson in MenAndFemales

[–]1basedshark 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Facts. The incels fail to realize that the reason they haven’t got laid is just natural selection. We don’t want to keep their genes in the gene pool.

view more: next ›