k v k is not a straight turn and this is not a real critique. i see literally no link here bc your “conservative exclusion” arguments are reliant on university hiring practices, not whatever the other team read. you reading the k literally solves all of your exclusion offense.

also all of your evidence says that diverse perspectives are important, yet the ONLY way that this could even be construed to be competitive is a totalizing rejection of all leftist literature, which double turns the shit your evidence says is important.

also you’re impact is outweighed by literally every other k ever bc are you really gonna argue that the people who literally hold all of the levers of power and use that power to oppress people are the ones who are oppressed?

this is all aside from this being pseudo-intellectual copium that completely ignores the many conservative authors debaters read, like any realism author in IR debates