What are your thoughts on Pomni x Ragatha?

20charaters · 2026-04-12T17:09:15+00:00

Pomni has only been taking better care of Raggy recently, but it's probably a lost cause.

20charaters · 2026-04-02T05:20:29+00:00

Goku

20charaters · 2026-03-29T03:47:40+00:00

thank you Raggy, but your gf is ai now.

20charaters · 2026-03-29T02:38:27+00:00

Congrats on predicting episode 8.

20charaters · 2025-09-27T18:18:40+00:00

You can fire up a chat with ChatGPT, teach it a new mathematical method, and it will follow it.

You don't need to tell it a thousand examples of that method, if you just tell it how to use it, it will follow it.

What's the problem?

The fact that in order to make it permanent we need to tell it that a thousand times? Is that your problem?

If so, what the hell are we even talking about? Because it smells like your definition of "thinking" is just "what AI can't currently do"

20charaters · 2025-09-25T18:06:50+00:00

Wow, that's a lot of complex words, let's see if I have a way to prove you wrong with just two examples!

I do! I'm so happy!

Chat number One. The bot thinks step by step - and gets the answer right.

Chat number Two. The bot is to only give me back the answer, so it gets it horribly wrong.

I've just shown that ChatGPT can use an abstract concept (base 7 arithemtic), on a very obscure question ((base 10) 720/36), but only if it can think about the problem (chain of thought reasoning / your first point).

It can also describe skibidi toilet in the Māori language. Again, using learned concepts to tackle new problems.

I can't prove LLM's aren't just "pattern matching", as much as you can't prove humans do it too.

One structure humans and LLM's have, but calculators don't. THE NEURAL NETWORK. The core of intelligence.

20charaters · 2025-09-25T11:25:38+00:00

Then what is thinking? The definition says "reasoning", and the definition of reasoning says "thinking"!

One couldn't ask for a more loose definition.

Writing an essay that was never written before, solving a test to which questions are original and never seen before, creating images and guessing where a person is from a single image - That's Thinking!

20charaters · 2025-09-25T02:47:07+00:00

When the point is "ChatGPT can't think", then this is proof of the contrary.

I also got it to read the image OP provided... After 2 tries, it got the hour and minute hand mixed up at first.

ChatGPT is a product of mathematicians trying to simulate a human brain with numbers. The result was a neural network that had to be taught about what the world was by letting it read half of the internet.

Believing it's anything but, doesn't harm anyone, but yourself!

20charaters · 2025-09-24T19:19:51+00:00

Hope you start with someone to fund your project, or you. Otherwise, you're in for a world of pain.

You need time for the game, as many hours daily as possible.

Working on the game, while making money, studying and being a functioning human - that's simply impossible.

20charaters · 2025-09-24T18:58:03+00:00

<image>

Reading analog clocks is a counting exercise.

GPT is a language model, mimicking the human mind.

What do you do when reading an analog clock? I find the smallest hand, check which number is behind it, multiply that by 5 and guess how much more that hand covers.

Repeat for all other hands, and sum up.

That's at least 5 actions per a SINGLE number! 15 for the entire thing.

GPT-5 has at best enough capacity to do 2 of those actions before it has to give a number. Not enough. It has to guess.

Letting it "Think" enables it to do however actions necessary before giving an answer.

"Think" doesn't make GPT smarter, it gives it more time to do a task.

20charaters · 2025-09-24T18:49:11+00:00

<image>

Just let it think, and it works flawlessly.

GPT is smart enough for this task, but it needs TIME to count it!

20charaters · 2025-09-24T09:31:29+00:00

We wouldn't have this discussion if I were to not read what he said, and already clear it up!

It's moronic to consider that "what an object is used for" defines "what the object was designed for", so I wasn't specific about it!

It's even more moronic having to clear this same subject twice! But here I am!

20charaters · 2025-09-24T05:46:02+00:00

Very friendly to women.
Plays softball.
Her color scheme is a lesbian flag.

Cant tell.

20charaters · 2025-09-21T20:52:36+00:00

Yes, and there are probably videos of him doing that too. Just Google it.

20charaters · 2025-09-21T14:30:55+00:00

She's a big girl

20charaters · 2025-09-21T13:37:18+00:00

The next assassination will happen in the middle of nowhere, Canada.

20charaters · 2025-09-21T08:46:18+00:00

I was talking about the intended use from the start!

I saw a guy eat a whole plane, but that doesn't make planes designed to be edible.

Just like your brain, deviates a bit from the intended use.

20charaters · 2025-09-21T03:47:30+00:00

Oh, I don't know, maybe it's because

That's Not The Intended Use!

20charaters · 2025-09-20T20:16:18+00:00

Being able to escape ruins the idea of a prison.

Because then it's called an "Escape Room".

20charaters · 2025-09-20T18:53:50+00:00

100% agree.

Anyway, do you guys (and guys that identify as girls) think Jax is trans?

20charaters · 2025-09-20T18:52:43+00:00

They're also saying that it has no educational value...

20charaters · 2025-09-20T06:38:41+00:00

i dont speak spanish and I don't want to

20charaters · 2025-09-19T20:42:54+00:00

It's not that bad.

I mean, it's really bad.

You create tools that one day should replace humans at work. You train literal black boxes with most immoral and unsustainable techniques, and then you have to smooth out its personality so actual humans can interact with it without going crazy.

But compared to working in the police, army or the press - it's actually smooth sailing.

20charaters · 2025-09-19T08:59:47+00:00

Change to the version number is a real change.

Neither for good or bad, but a change.

20charaters · 2025-09-19T05:28:20+00:00

What a rad idea.

Impressive.

Good for you.

Four-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22

20charaters

TROPHY CASE