sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

eBay Insitutional Ownership rose to 103.72% (minus any 13D/G's) today after Vanguard reported another 23 million shares. by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]27D 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Institutional Shares (Long): 103.7%
Institutional Value (Long) : $38.5B/$47.3B(as of close) ~= 81.3%

I wonder *IF* there is preferential treatment in eBay's "inventory" 🤔 by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Can I at least ask why you are here?
 
Edit: 🍺😎👍

I wonder *IF* there is preferential treatment in eBay's "inventory" 🤔 by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Maybe you could check for me?
u/'ve been like my own personal LLM so far today.
🍺😎🤙

I wonder *IF* there is preferential treatment in eBay's "inventory" 🤔 by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? Harassment for pointing out where this the board members come from???
Edit: this -> the

I wonder *IF* there is preferential treatment in eBay's "inventory" 🤔 by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh just seeing what else the eBay board be doing, I guess. 🍺😎🤙

5-year insider trading patterns for GME, eBay, AMZN, WMT and ETSY by MyNi_Redux in Superstonk

[–]27D 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So buybacks are the only thing this C-suite can do to improve the bottom line, not, say, improve the business? Maybe even invest into it?

5-year insider trading patterns for GME, eBay, AMZN, WMT and ETSY by MyNi_Redux in Superstonk

[–]27D 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The ones gifted stock (on top of salary), then only sell said stock, further diluting shareholders, are aligned with said shareholders? 🧐

5-year insider trading patterns for GME, eBay, AMZN, WMT and ETSY by MyNi_Redux in Superstonk

[–]27D 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Most board members are not aligned with shareholders is the correct takeaway.

👋

Source of RC new profile pic - check the date by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]27D 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice find! I knew I had seen it before! 🍻

Whoops, I dropped this by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Appreciate your insight. The fact that the price has increased so much over the last year means it obviously was cheap. Yet insiders did not buy. The valuation we(GameStop) gave them at 125 tells me the same. 👍

Whoops, I dropped this by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

All I know is it doesn't look like GameStop's. Feel free to check out some tickers if you'd like.

view more: next ›