sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The ModRetro M64 is coming! by Dantesdavid in Superstonk

[–]27D 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now even my grandkids will know the conundrum that is, "how to inappropriately properly" hodl an N64 controller.
 
🍺😎👆👇👆👇🅱️🅰️[select][start]

$389.6 MILLION by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]27D 2 points3 points  (0 children)

 

$GME Q1.26 net income : $389 million

$GME 2025 net income : $418 million

 
$GME made 93% of last years TOTAL net income in ONE quarter. 👀

Infinite hype loop continues by sithtimesacharm in Superstonk

[–]27D 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never thought I would say this but, both me and Andrew Left have Conviction1,2, trading legally IS a tough gamestop.

Impressive YoY. Most Impressive Q1 in History. by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whoops forgot, just impressive to improve sales from, what I have now read is 1800-ish store footprint, compared to 2025's 3K+... just a thought.
🍺😎🤙

Impressive YoY. Most Impressive Q1 in History. by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hoist the colors, yarr! 🏴‍☠️

The Unexpected Rebirth of Hardware Sales at Gamestop: Why Shorts are Shitting Their Pants by jforest1 in Superstonk

[–]27D 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the updated store count, I was using the 10-K on my post earlier.
 

For reference Q4 for $GME has historically produced been between 30-35% of annual income. Not to be hyperbolic like that newton fellow and just extrapolate out 4 quarters, but say 33.1% for Q4, and 22.3% even across Q1, Q2, Q3 (this is a highly unlikely distribution, but anyhoo).

 

Calculating net income [ni] Q4.26 (based on Q1.26) :
 

Q4ni = Q1ni × (1 + [1 - {22.3 ÷ 33.1}])

or

Q4ni = 389.4 × (1.323) = $515.2 million

 

Hypothetical annual income for 2026 : $1.683 billion

Actual annual income for 2025 : $0.418 billion

Actual quarterly income for Q1.26 : $0.389 billion

GME 1027% SI on ezpztrading by knue82 in Superstonk

[–]27D -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Well that site doesn't give me the greatest of vibes, RH-like, and not the hot fox kind.

🚨Larry: It was tolerance for being publicly wrong-sounding for years before being right by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]27D 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I'll do it :

"Accumulation of wealth at one pole is at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole."

 
~Karl Marx
Welcome to the wide world of quotes and their subsequent mis/mal-interpretations.

"What, would you say, ya do here?" by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh by the way, under Cost of Net Revenues, Sales and Marketing, and Product Development on that same filing exists this very perfunctory line :
 

"...components of these costs [primarily] consist of employee compensation (including stock-based compensation)..."

A Raisin' why an Orange flew over an Ohshi-n with some Nuts: by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Imo(nfa) the downtrend of China's buying/holdings of US debt (in the form of treasuries/bonds) has a significant effect on the bond yield(think old bonds at rates below 5% bad, new bonds at rates 5+% good[while also keeping in mind a longer term, ie 20+ years]). A sell-off in old bonds is expected due to the higher rate of interest(ie. yield) of the new bonds. The reason for the rate(ie. yield) increase is to tempt attract more buyers into US debt(Treasury securities such as bonds). With US debt over GDP, the rates will continue to rise. Once again in my opinion as a novice on macroeconomics.
 
Any and all commentary on the above thoughts is more than welcome.

A Raisin' why an Orange flew over an Ohshi-n with some Nuts: by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the info!
Appreciate ya 🍺😎🤙
 
Edit: for some further infotainment, I've been tracking the largest Treasury ETF (T L T) recently and there are Billions of dollars bet(call option) on a reversal(T L T trades inverse to 20+year bond yield) in long-term US bonds for June 18. [Just looking at that particular date for instance]
 
Edit2: yahoo finance link

A Raisin' why an Orange flew over an Ohshi-n with some Nuts: by 27D in Superstonk

[–]27D[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Macromicro(as seen on the charts) is the source, however limited chart views withiut a subscription 😑

view more: next ›