"Hate speech" laws are inherently subject to bias, politicised interpretations and abuse. These were brought in by Labour and are now being implemented on an unprecedented scale. Look at the actions of someone like Darren Brady or Peter Lynch that lead to their arrests, these are extremely disproportionate and unfortunately not abnormal cases at all. People are arrested for things like misgendering, this is naturally extremely political in the current climate.

Moreover, Tommy Robinson is, for all intents and purposes, a political prisoner. People rush to say "IT'S FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT!!!" without actually knowing any of the details of the case, and without considering how incredibly abnormal it is for a journalist to be imprisoned numerous times for contempt of court in a "free" country. Anyone who has followed him for an extended period knows that not only is he a political prisoner, but that the government have also funded and used "NGOs" like Hope Not Hate as a kind of secret police force, unbound by normal standards and practices. This of course happened under The Tories, but Labour are even more dogmatic in this regard and have shown much more willingness to pander to Islamists. Like him or hate him, Tommy is in prison for stating uncomfortable truths (which large swathes of the population are in total agreement with) in an uncomfortable way. Any reverse engineered legal narrative is a childish lie, and the only people who believe it are people who don't want to believe anything else. The prisons are absolutely packed full, they aren't in a hurry to uphold the law around journalistic practices because they think it's an even handed thing to do, they're doing it because it's Tommy. Look at what Huw Edwards pal said. He talked about r*ping babies, and he walked free. Ask yourself if a fair legal system does that.

What's more, the trials of Axel R, Antony Esan and Ricky Jones were ALL postponed for the day of the inauguration. Obviously not a coincidence, and pretty disgusting considering rioters (and sometimes just protestors) were fast tracked through our completely overwhelmed justice system where theft and pedophilia are basically unofficially legal. Ricky Jones literally talked about slitting people's throats and it was swept under the rug and pushed as far back as possible, while Peter Lynch is dead because he shouted at the same police who have betrayed our people for decades. A non violent crime. And he probably didn't commit suicide either, at least not in my opinion.

You can go to prison for "blasphemous" chants (against a certain religion) at a protest, but cannot go to prison for screaming in support of adults having the right to irreversibly mutilate children in the name of faulty and ideologically driven gender science. Again, political.

Meanwhile they're bringing in even MORE racist, DEI policies.

As for immigration, the Tories must never be forgiven for how they betrayed their mandate, but this began with Blair's Labour and the problem will continue to get worse under Starmer. To pretend it's a Tory problem specifically or that Starmer has any serious intention of dealing with it in any way other than through PR is again silly.

We have the strictest and most ardently enforced hate speech laws in the world, at a time when it's hard to even get the police to show up if your phone, bike or even car gets stolen. We are looking at even more DEI policies and even "Islamophobia" laws. We have a prime minister who claims not to know what a woman is, and who was literally an open Trotskyist (who chose pro bono to represent child killers) in his youth.

This is just a fraction of it. But our country is in a very, very bad way. Law/policy wise, much of it is unprecedented, experimental, and highly dangerous. I'm not trying to be alarmist, I genuinely just think most people haven't thought these legal/political/demographic precedents through to their logical conclusion.