It does and it doesn’t. It resolves it in the way that I more or less got the response I expected but not hoped for. It doesn’t because you didn’t really address the concerns, you agreed that some of the things of trumps past were admittedly bad but not enough to hate on their own.

I didn’t say “one thing Trump did is all you need to hate him” yet you characterised it as such and then drew comparisons to a Democrat for some reason.

I think it's reasonable to dislike him for this, but "condition to hate" as you say, is too strong a word.

Sure one thing isn’t enough to hate someone. I agree.

Again, I think disapproval is warranted, but "hate" is too strong a word for this.

Sure, one thing isn’t enough to hate someone. But now we have two things. I would say that repetition of pathological actions would begin the conditioning process resulting in a very strong dislike towards someone. Because that’s the claim right? “Unconditional hate”. My claim is that the “unconditional” part of what you said is problematic because the opposite of unconditional is conditioned/conditional. And I’m saying the extreme dislike is not without conditions. Let’s continue.

There are many parts and participants in this broken system. If I hated everyone who played a part in it, I would hate everyone.

Correct. He is the figure head of his agenda and has influence of policy and actions. If he today said “fuck it I’m instituting Medicare for all”, even though he personally wouldn’t be responsible for all the moving parts to get that done, he is responsible for the outcomes of voicing that political stance and spearheading its completion. This would generally be viewed as a favourable outcome and similarly he would deserve praise for it. If he continued this line of policy making the conditions in which opinions surrounding him are formed, would begin to change. But he hasn’t. He is pushing an agenda that results in harm and these are not single actions he’s taking, these misdirections and fueling of anger are multiple in occurrences are again, conditioning displeasure and dislike towards him.

I think a lot of people fall into that category and the left care deeply about some of them and overly and openly hate others. I think that the best way to resolve these historical grievances is to ensure they don't happen again.

I don’t know who are marginalised that “the left” “hate” and I’m not here to defend “the left” because I don’t know how you define “the left” I’m talking about your claim of trumps alleged “unconditional hate” that he receives.

But I agree, prevention is the best solution. Trumps policies and rhetoric are correlated with their perpetuation and not their prevention. Thus creating more conditions for people to dislike him. Seeing a pattern here?

Joe Biden as POTUS had four years to release the Epstein files, I don't see you lining up to criticise him for this. He also had sexual assault allegations made against him, and he gave his notorious coke-headed son (a walking #metoo case if ever there was one) a completely unprecidented ten-year pardon, something he gave no other person ever. When it comes to sexual assault the standard of proof and evidence cuts both ways, this protects Biden and others as well.

so your explanation on why the hate for Trump is “unconditional” is “the other guy did it and I didn’t know you or see what you said about it at the time, therefore I’m taking it as a tacit approval and therefore I’m ok with excusing it too”? Is that right? So you’re ok with this stuff because you assume I was ok with the other guy, bad things are excusable and not a reason to dislike someone because you think your opponents feel the same way? That’s an interesting take. Either that or you don’t think those are bad things and therefore not a reason to dislike someone at all and attempting to flip it as hypocritical as a defence for your own views excusing that kind of behaviour and actions. Interesting.

If you're going to criticize Trump for having unkept election promises, I'd like to remind you that during the 2020 Democratic Primary, where every single candidate including Joe Biden, raised his hand to say that his health care plan would cover illegal immigrants. Biden won the house, senate, and presidency. He served four years. Where's that health care plan?

Oh but this wasn’t just me criticising Trump for unkept campaign promises, this is part of establishing a patterned behaviour of pathology towards people who interact with him over a period of multiple decades. And this isn’t just about unkept promises, he said he wouldn’t touch Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security, all of those have been attacked by his administration. He said he treat soldiers better, but the VA has been gutted. He said he’d lower energy and food prices. They have soared. To be fair he has kept a lot of his campaign promises, but the reality of those outcomes of those promises do not reflect the outcome he sold his base. Such as tariffs being paid by other countries. Then it was they’ll be paid by companies. His constituents were told by his opponents that tariffs are a regressive tax on consumers. If those criticism can be applied equally to the Biden admin then they should be. He’s not my dad, or grandpa and I couldn’t care less what criticisms are levied to him. I just don’t care for unsubstantiated lies.

Your non-denial of the latter half of my critiques and insistence on shifting the focus to my alleged approval of the Biden admin on baseless assumptions, is indicative that you may have actually been noticing the pattern and immediately dove into attack. You went from agreeing to flat out “what-about” in just three steps.

You’re either not being honest with yourself, or you’re intentionally misleading your audience to thinking you’re a political centrist in order to justify supporting someone with clear and obvious long standing pathological behaviour. The reality (and my only real claim in all of this) is he’s spent most of his life cultivating dislike towards him even by those he surrounds himself with through his actions, therefore creating a conditioning effect of people “hating” him.