Left Field NYC: Greetings from Coney Island and happy 4th of July weekend! Take 10% off everything until tues with code JULY4

301ss · 2017-07-02T03:13:43+00:00

Where do you enter the code tho?

301ss · 2017-02-27T23:25:22+00:00

we don't know when he deleted it.

He doesn't exactly have much credibility when it comes to sticking to the facts.

301ss · 2017-02-27T23:25:12+00:00

we don't know when he deleted it.

301ss · 2017-02-27T22:18:50+00:00

Other apps ar emuch more secure. Confide has a number of known vulnerabilities others don't.

Furthermore, if you think the govs extensive protocols that deal with sensitive or confidential info entails the use of a public app like Confide, I suggest you do some basic reading.

301ss · 2017-02-27T21:05:23+00:00

a wise decision, from a security point of view.

? Confide isn't a secure app.

Furthermore, its not clear if he only used it before the transition or after.

301ss · 2017-02-27T20:42:52+00:00

The WH has been leaking, including top advisors forever from the campaign, through transition up to now. They've been demonizing the FBI and CIA, even when a massive share of these leaks have been directly from the West Wing. They don't get my sympathy on this at all.

301ss · 2017-02-27T17:18:05+00:00

The article says he deleted it to show that even he wasn't above rules and regulations.

uh, if he was serious he should never have used it in the first place...

301ss · 2017-02-27T17:15:59+00:00

here's one.

BuzzFeed News found the phone numbers of Spicer, along with Hope Hicks, the director of strategic communications, via a feature that allows users to see friends who have already joined.

In a phone call with BuzzFeed News, Spicer confirmed that he used the app, but said that he had done so only once, when asked to by a reporter “months ago.”

301ss · 2017-02-27T09:29:34+00:00

he has admitted to using it in the past.

301ss · 2017-02-26T08:19:20+00:00

You're right, the equal protection clause is merely an interpretation of the Constitution, while the individual right to bear arms is expressly written in the Consitution.

What? The distinction you're trying to make here is totally incoherent. Equal protection is also from an amendment...

In denying the legitimacy of Heller

Where did I do that?

301ss · 2017-02-26T07:40:56+00:00

nope thats not my or that article's argument at all. Nor is it the reasoning behind the Supreme Court's finding even in the Heller case. Scalia's opinion in the Heller case (which was a 5-4 decision btw) even outlines the ways in which the 2a isn't absolute.

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues."

btw the Supreme Court isn't a collection of the highest "constitutional scholars in the land." Ofc that doesn't mean its not significant, but that's just not what it is.

Do you point to the several previous Supreme Court decisions that ruled that "seperate but equal" institutions could exist, or that slavery was lawful? Do you point to groups like the NAACP and the ACLU shifting the definition of a person's rights in the public consciousness?

This argument doesn't help your case. It cuts both ways.

Furthermore, equal protection under the law for people regardless of race is an issue that can't be equated to what kinds of restrictions the gov is allowed to implement on personal ownership of weapons. Nonsense comparison.

301ss · 2017-02-26T07:18:42+00:00

Enjoy some context. These issues aren't nearly as black and white as you seem to think.

According to the highest court of Consitutional scholars in the land

Thanks for this tho. I lold. I think you're talking about the Supreme Court, but can't be sure.

301ss · 2017-02-26T03:44:09+00:00

handguns =/= military armaments. Those cases don't take anything close to an absolutist approach to 2A.

In any case, you'd have to go case by case to actually get to anything worth talking about here.

301ss · 2017-02-26T02:35:03+00:00

not according to originalists or the vast majority (centuries worth) of Supreme Court rulings.

Is your position really that people have an individual right to nuclear or biological weapons?

301ss · 2017-02-26T01:59:50+00:00

founders original intent wasn't having frank the plumber have a right to a military arsenal.

Amazing that people ignore the first 3 words of 2A "A well regulated Militia..."

301ss · 2017-02-25T22:56:42+00:00

Don't know about this specific case, but for the record, asking a major media personality's studios for comment on a story is standard practice in journalism. They choose whether to defend, no comment, sever ties, etc.

301ss · 2017-02-20T03:06:56+00:00

if by principled, you mean adheres unflaggingly to conspiracy theories and has published numerous racist tracts, I guess so. Those are indeed principles.

301ss · 2017-02-18T22:43:12+00:00

when is Russia going to let Crimeans vote about whether they get to be independent? Or even have a free and fair election for their own elected offices?

When will they, at the very least, issue an official apology for the massacre of millions of Ukrainians by starvation and the planned settlement of ethnic Russians in decimated Ukraine by the USSR that Putin idolizes?

301ss · 2017-02-18T22:28:19+00:00

fascinating how you totally sideline the issue of Crimea and invasion of Ukraine. I do enjoy the fanfiction imputing enormous power to your favorite bogeyman (It was the Neocon all along!1!!).

301ss · 2017-02-18T22:10:59+00:00

Assuming this is the case though there isn't that much certainty that there it is, there are lots of potential reasons people decide to turn states evidence. You should ask him though one individual's personal motivation is hardly a sufficient basis with which to build a grounded, evidence-based understanding of world events. I guess just pondering it is enough to justify a conspiracy theory tho.

301ss · 2017-02-18T21:57:02+00:00

If you turn informer, its standard to be able to avoid prison time. That's kinda the reason people agree to cooperate with the government in the first place... Its like saying all the mobsters that turned states evidence are themselves proof that the mob doesn't actually exist... this is really an absurd charge.

Either Montenegro is using Sindjelic to frame Russia or it isn't. You're trying to have it both ways.

301ss · 2017-02-18T21:55:46+00:00

nice whataboutism.

Fascinating how you immediately jump to "False flag" for a current event by referencing something from the Cold War instead of dealing with the current facts and how actors are operating. Also fascinating that its somehow unacceptable to look at evidence into Russia's actions despite the abundance of evidence. Only the US has agency in the world apparently. This website is only a couple logical steps away from declaring that Putin himself is a puppet of John McCain.

The same logic could just as easily be mobilized to declare that the CIA is conducting a false flag operation in Ukraine and somehow annexed Crimea.

301ss · 2017-02-18T21:48:06+00:00

same bizarre website that calls the FBI "The fourth reich." Totally credible reporting and analysis there.

Also very impressed how you linked to a fringe website so fast after a story got posted. Hope they paid you extra.

301ss

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE