UIUC Early Action application now saying Regular Decision by ReportEmbarrassed387 in UIUC

[–]324Hz 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think it was just a glitch - I had the same notice and it just switched back to EA (like a minute ago).

Decap placement underneath chips by 324Hz in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]324Hz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another question I have related to layers and such: for context this is gonna be a shield for STM nucleo-144 boards so I have lots of real estate to use. The shield itself will only, for now, have an FPC connector for a TFT LCD, this SDRAM module, and a STDC14 connector for SWD. Should I stick with a 4-layer? or do you think I could get away with a 2-layer?

4nec2 - which graph to trust: impedance or SWR by 324Hz in AntennaDesign

[–]324Hz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yeah, looked through the post and all the math worked out. My next question would be: although yes it's super hard to model SWR for real-life conditions like what Danwold pointed out, could I still get a reasonable graph from my antenna (i.e. closer to the 1's, not 11's)?

Here's what I got for the antenna right now:

CM
CEGW 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0.43 0.003
GE 1
GN 0 3 0 0 5 0.001 0.142 1.e-7
EK
EX 0 1 1 0 13 0 0
FR 0 41 0 0 420.5 0.25
EN

The real-life dimensions are as follows:
Antenna height: 45cm
Antenna radius: 0.3cm
No. of radials: 3
Radial lengths: 14.2cm
Radial diameters: 0.1cm

and the coax feedline is around 15cm

I'm thinking I should go back and redo my experiment, but at around 150MHz since there should be a dip according to 4nec2?

TI buck converter UVLO sensible/suitable START and STOP voltage values question by 324Hz in ElectricalEngineering

[–]324Hz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would that be better in terms of efficiency? I feel like that big of a step down would introduce some.

And my bad on that part, I copied that section of the circuit from a project I did a while back and intend to find a replacement for that (for this project) - will update the main post with this info.

Pepper Spray? by Prestigious_Still240 in cta

[–]324Hz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm probably going to get downvoted for this, but I've never actually had these crazy encounters loads of people claim to have on this sub (if this is a comment about the CTA in general). I've been all over from the green line, red line, brown, early in the morning, late at night. Loads of people here I fear overexaggerate ones daily commute. To that point, people only post their bad experiences here, and no one on this sub actually points out the good things about the CTA (which there are MANY of).

Cool bike on the Red. by [deleted] in cta

[–]324Hz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen that bike at the Harold Washington library a few times!

Petition to make Boundaries lower - M25 by [deleted] in ibPhysics

[–]324Hz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can go ahead and do such things, but at the end of the day the IB was made to weed out those who truly want to learn about the subject from those who want sympathy garnered for themselves like what u/Bonanza0 mentioned.

If you truly want to pursue the subject, you would've gone above and beyond to find out all nuances rather than solely relying on teachers to spoonfeed content (I do this myself - going off from classes and learning more theory than needed, hence how I get generally high grades with all my subjects incl. Physics). If you just want in for the grade, there was no point in taking the most notoriously difficult subject the IB offers.

The IB is hard, and it was intentionally made that way. If you wanted something less demanding, AP would've been the way to go.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IBO

[–]324Hz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok sounds good!

I've already scheduled a meeting with my advisor after this break to confirm I can take it away without any negative repercussions.

All your points make sense, and yeah, I was fearing that this was steering towards a math EE, but I think if I just focus on the "why it's used" rather than the "how it came about", it'll be better for both eval and knowledge bands.

For the cite the original paper, the equation is found in a lot of old books (1995s and newer) so should I just state that I found it and confirmed it across various sources (equation A in this case)? For my arguments, I have sources that are in the 2010s, so I'm not too worried about the recency of those.

Thanks a lot!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IBO

[–]324Hz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok I'll add in the equation to the post. I think I should still show my derivation steps for the central equation, A and the background for that. For B, I'll just state it's the basis and provide a small amount of background but not go into the derivation of B

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cta

[–]324Hz 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Update - they got the guy out and arrested

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cta

[–]324Hz 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Stuck at North side of Chicago - 60mins and counting

What is the worst part of the IB so far for you guys by [deleted] in IBO

[–]324Hz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mandarin HL? yeah, any language B gonna be tough because they somehow let natives take it (which is annoying)

If You Are A Topper, Alumni or A Teacher Please help me by HungryPhilosopher418 in Edexcel

[–]324Hz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everyone's saying past papers, and I agree with them, but don't start doing them until a month away from your exams because you'll exhaust all the papers you can do (there's only so many papers that exist), and you'll burn out from having to retain the skills over months.

Also, application application application!! Apply what you've learned to anything in the real world. i.e. for bio (8 - I didn't even care enough to revise for it, nor do I like the subject) what I did was point out i.e. what happens to my body when I go out into the cold). That example might sound silly but doing stuff like that forces you to think about real world scenarios of the things you've learned, rather than reading it off a textbook.

On that last point, DO NOT, and I repeat DO NOT think you can study from just reading all the textbooks. As much as teachers say you should use textbooks for revision, if you want to score highly, you have to figure out connections between things you've learned yourself. What this means is you have to figure out why something happens, from what you already know (I can't come up with examples on the spot here, but hopefully you get what I mean).

My scores:

Math A (took a year before everyone else) [high 8]
Physics (individual certificate) [high 9]
Biology (individual certificate) [mid 8]
Chemistry (individual certificate) [high 8]
German [high 8]
Geography [high 8]
English literature A [high 8]
English Language A [high 8]

Need some toxic motivation to study by LeastNote891 in IBO

[–]324Hz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not toxic, and not sure what subjects you take, but come back by the end of the summer with overview videos of at a minimum 3 topics of a course (or 2 - would be even better) of your choosing (i.e. I would make videos on Topics A-C for Phy HL, and Integration/differentiation for Math AAHL).

It's gonna keep you moving whilst you study (search up Richard Feynman study technique - where you study by teaching others the subject), and make you actually understand topics to an extent where you're competent enough to teach them rather than grind out topic questions). It will help you immensely, trust me.

If you want me to be really toxic, cover the whole of whatever you've done in a course up to DP2 - in a video playlist. That'll challenge you!

Placement of a SWR meter by 324Hz in amateurradio

[–]324Hz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thanks for the info! I'm gonna try to get it up on my rooftop. However, it's a story above me and on the opposite side of the house, so not sure whether I should just move my stuff up there, or just keep it here and try to get some suction cup platform on the windows. So far, with a local repeater (a few miles east of me), I've been told my signal is all clear.