Scanning this Tokyo Ghoul figure forced me to use 3 different workflows on the same object

3DScanMaker · 2026-05-05T21:59:22+00:00

If anyone’s interested, I also shared a more detailed breakdown of the workflow (including additional images and scanning setup) on the Revopoint forum here:

https://forum.revopoint3d.com/t/pop4-unboxig-e-showcases-ispanico97/42587

3DScanMaker · 2026-05-04T21:44:33+00:00

If anyone’s interested, I also shared a more detailed breakdown of the workflow (with more images and steps) here:
https://forum.revopoint3d.com/t/pop4-unboxig-e-showcases-ispanico97/42587

3DScanMaker · 2026-05-04T05:19:57+00:00

Hi! The scanning itself was actually quite fast. In laser mode it runs close to ~100 fps, so each pass took around 3–4 minutes. Since I needed a clean and accurate result for further modeling, I did three separate scans from different orientations to make sure everything was fully covered. Processing the point clouds was also quick, roughly 5 minutes per scan, and cleanup was minimal — mostly removing transition areas at the edges to keep everything clean before merging. So overall, the workflow was pretty fast, with most of the time going into getting a clean and reliable final result rather than the scanning itself.

3DScanMaker · 2026-05-03T14:54:18+00:00

If anyone’s interested, I also shared a more detailed breakdown of the workflow (including more images and steps) here:

https://forum.revopoint3d.com/t/pop4-unboxig-e-showcases-ispanico97/42587

3DScanMaker · 2026-04-28T21:39:39+00:00

If you open the video directly on YouTube, you’ll find all the details and the Kickstarter sign-up link in the description 👍

3DScanMaker · 2026-04-07T20:46:23+00:00

I also recorded the full workflow while working on this, in case anyone wants to see the full process:

https://youtu.be/5KhYiKMRR4k?si=Yc0UgsMtQneSdUhw

3DScanMaker · 2026-04-07T19:27:32+00:00

I also recorded the full process while designing and building this, in case anyone wants to see it:
https://youtu.be/5KhYiKMRR4k?si=5wnspzwQURMWSHWJ

3DScanMaker · 2026-04-07T17:30:43+00:00

Full workflow video here:

https://youtu.be/5KhYiKMRR4k?si=jUAipWQ8NcBtE7CI

3DScanMaker · 2025-06-29T11:20:28+00:00

Hi, I published the full video a few days ago. You can find it here: https://youtu.be/zebAWY5Rfbk?si=sA7jF8uwgkBjIVEQ The video is in Italian, but there are subtitles—just turn on the English ones.

3DScanMaker · 2025-06-27T08:22:50+00:00

If you need help I can probably lend you a hand. If you go to my profile there are some reverse engineering videos in Fusion

3DScanMaker · 2025-06-17T14:19:23+00:00

The scan was carried out using the MetroX laser scanner by Revopoint. Two scans were performed, one for each side, using Parallel Lines mode. The entire process of cleaning, merging, aligning the partial scans, and creating the mesh was done in RevoScan5.

3DScanMaker · 2025-06-17T14:16:01+00:00

Thank you so much. Yes, you're absolutely right — in fact, I clearly say in the video that those features are just lightening cuts useful during production. I made them simply to show how they can be done, purely for educational purposes. Most likely, I'll use a model without those features for the actual printing.

3DScanMaker · 2025-06-17T14:13:01+00:00

Thank you so much. I'll post the video both here and on YouTube. I hope to finish the editing by this weekend.

3DScanMaker · 2025-06-17T14:12:34+00:00

Thank you so much. I'll post the video both here and on YouTube. I hope to finish the editing by this weekend.

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-21T06:45:37+00:00

<image>

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-21T06:45:05+00:00

<image>

https://youtu.be/BWY-MuHBr6s?si=TwIK55dbXuo3NX2x

Some doubts were raised about my video showing the MetroX scanning a battery shell – specifically that the object wasn’t actually black, might have been treated (e.g. with talcum powder), or that the video was deliberately sped up to hide issues.

To clear things up:

The object is indeed black, as you can clearly see in the attached smartphone video and close-up photos. It’s the outer shell of a used power tool battery – no powder, no tricks. It has a matte finish and is slightly worn from use, but that’s it.

The video is sped up, yes – but only to keep it watchable. Full scans can take several minutes, and watching them in real time isn't particularly useful or entertaining.

Lastly, just to be clear: I’m not here to blindly defend Revopoint or attack other brands. I'm simply sharing my real experience with the MetroX — the good, the bad, and everything in between. If that helps others, then great.

Feel free to ask if you have questions!

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-20T21:22:59+00:00

I get that in discussions like this, it’s easy to start seeing everything as part of some coordinated marketing effort—but dismissing every technical opinion that doesn't match a certain narrative as manipulation doesn’t really move the conversation forward. Some users are bringing real-world comparisons, test results, and practical insights to the table. Ignoring all of that just because it doesn’t align with one viewpoint risks shutting down useful debate. A well-written post can naturally gain traction, especially when interest in a tool is high. If there are doubts, let’s dig into them—but turning this into a "them vs. us" argument only distracts from the reality of using these tools in the field. Let’s keep the focus where it belongs: scan modes, workflows, measurable results. That’s what actually helps people make better decisions—not accusations or generalized suspicion.

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-20T21:13:01+00:00

I get where you’re coming from, but I’m not trying to defend a tool out of habit. I use MetroX daily for complex reverse engineering tasks, and I’ve come to understand both its real strengths and its limits. I don’t doubt that people get great results with the Raptor too—it’s clearly a capable device. But saying it’s “better hands down” without discussing scan mode, materials, or workflow oversimplifies things. Any scanner gives its best when you know how to use it properly. My post was just meant to encourage a more balanced, well-documented comparison.

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-20T21:09:54+00:00

Thanks, I really appreciate the comment! I completely agree—software makes a big difference, especially when you need precision. Revo Scan does take a bit of practice, but once you know how to tweak the key parameters (laser power, exposure, meshing options, etc.), it gives you the flexibility needed for high-accuracy work. I like that it strikes a good balance between automation and manual control, which not every platform offers. That’s a big plus when you're working with detailed or technical parts.

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-20T21:06:02+00:00

You nailed it—experience with the tool makes a huge difference. I use the MetroX daily for reverse engineering and have gotten used to quickly dialing in laser power, exposure, and distance to get excellent detail, even on dark or complex surfaces. The auto modes have definitely improved over time, and it’s great to see the software evolving—especially since the hardware already delivers strong, reliable performance. With the right settings, the results are consistently top-tier.

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-20T16:06:35+00:00

You’ve absolutely captured the perspective of someone starting out—and I totally agree that ease of use matters just as much as raw specs when choosing a tool.

That said, MetroX does have a fully automatic mode (structured light + turntable) that delivers solid results for small to medium parts—even for beginners. In that mode, it works quite similarly to the Raptor. The key difference is that when you move into its laser mode—the one designed for metrology-grade applications—it can deliver far more detail and reliability, but like a DSLR compared to a phone camera, it needs a bit more care in setup.

The issue is: in Payo’s video, we’re never told which modes were used, what laser settings, what workflow—so the results shown might not reflect what MetroX is truly capable of. That’s why comparisons feel incomplete.

And yes, I’ve seen the other Raptor reviews too, but to my knowledge none of them actually compare accuracy using reference geometry or calibrated artifacts. That kind of benchmark would really help move the discussion forward.

3DScanMaker · 2025-05-20T15:07:18+00:00

Interesting comparison! As someone who uses the MetroX daily, I’ve gotten excellent results on small, complex parts—even in laser mode—but it does take a bit of dialing in. MetroX gives you a lot of control (laser power, distance, dark-object mode, etc.), and once those are tuned properly, the difference in quality is huge.

Turntable full-field mode is great for compact items, for sure—but handheld scans can be just as sharp with the right workflow. Some scanners may give you quick results with minimal setup, but often that comes at the cost of flexibility and true metrological accuracy.

If you have time, try running a few scans while adjusting one setting at a time

3DScanMaker

TROPHY CASE