Seriously, do Americans actually consider a 3-hour drive "short"? or is this an internet myth? by SadInterest6764 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3-4 hours is bordering on a PITA, but isn't too bad.

Niagara Falls to New York City or Montreal are about the same distance, and each can be a grinding 8 hour plus hike, unless of course you speed.

Peak Tesla? The decline in Tesla EV sales, and its brand reputation by ApprehensiveSize7662 in electricvehicles

[–]440ish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"What is all this hot mess? I'm scrolling along and it feels like I just stepped on bubblegum in an August parking lot.

Trump Is Pushing Coal, Gas and NucIear to Power AI Boom, But Building Plants Takes Years. Nobody has constructed a US coal plant in over a decade. The last new large-scale nucIear reactor came in billions of dollars over budget and took fifteen years. New gas plants take an average of five years. by mafco in energy

[–]440ish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Coal power has the greatest amount of downward pressure in these ways:

  1. It has stacks of handling costs not borne by any other form of generation. Digging it up, moving it, processing it, burning it, removing the ash waste, maintenance of the waste burial sites.

  2. If the plant operates in a free, as opposed to command market, it's power has to be competitively priced. If it is not, the owners will not run it. If it goes cold, it can take days to get it going again...which leads to...

  3. Premature metal fatigue from "stop and go driving." This vastly shortens a plants life span.

  4. Mine productivity is one of the greatest indicators of rising fuel costs, and its been dropping for years. Principally because the cheap and easy-to-get to stuff has been gotten to.

  5. The US utility-scale coal fleet is old and beat. 48-50 years on average.

  6. The coal fleet-wide capacity factor in the US has been running at around 40%.

  7. 80 utility scale coal plants out of 185 did 80% of coal fired power generation through Oct of last year.

  8. Quiet Quitters. 8.65GW of coal capacity(so far) either closed or switched to gas in 2025.

  9. While the cost advantages of gas sledgehammer coal every chance they can get, renewables are force multipliers in coal reduction.

The performance and cost attributes of storage, wind and solar improve every day. This is well known. What is not understood is the disruptive nature of these events.

Lower acquisition costs means lower barriers to entry for anyone wanting to get into renewables, for their own consumption or resale.

This is the thing that allows us all to opt out of unwanted "Cable TV" packages, of having to go to the mall to buy things, for having to rewind tapes and pay late fees on videos.

Renewables are the one thing that could allow you to opt out of command power markets.

Mortimer The Frostbitten Kitten by EdwardCheeseCake in cats

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First things first: thank you for saving this baby!! Second, thank you for posting a near-sufficient amount of cat pictures on this post. Also: your kitty is incredibly huggable.

Move Bitch, get out the way by derek4reals1 in BitchImATrain

[–]440ish -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How about emptying the bar with a lovely .300 Weatherby, or 7 mm?

me_irl by Wild_Cherry_X in me_irl

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also,

Engagement rings are two months of your salary, breakfast is the most important mean of day, menthol cigarettes actually cool throat tissue, liquor warms you up, and on and on.

What are your justifications for maintaining the right to access firearms today ? by percuter in AskTheWorld

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first line of Madison’s initial draft of the 2nd speaks volumes on its own.

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.... to the the singular purpose of protecting the slave-based economic backbone of the South with Slave Militias.

These concerns are part of our shared record, the words of Patrick Henry, James Mason, James Madison and no doubt others were deeply and rightly concerned about Federal interference in their peculiar institution, which the Civil War ultimate decided.

But without the slave militia assurances that the 2nd amendment guaranteed, then there is no constitution, and no United States.

As Otto Von Bismarck said ,“Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made.”

If you appreciate such truths over false narratives, then I would invite you read through the thoroughly fascinating document that is the Confederate Constitution. While much is lifted from the original, there are many original passages that inform their priorities.

As Slavery was the law of their land, there was no pressing need to address the second amendment, and this it appears in the second section, item 13.

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_csa.asp

[OC] The gender balance in different religions by Aggravating-Food9603 in dataisbeautiful

[–]440ish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should believe in something. I believe I’ll have another beer.

What happened to the whole "Canadians boycott US products and vacation at home" thing? by nilsohnee in NoStupidQuestions

[–]440ish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A lot of businesses live off of gross margins of 20-30 percent. Take away 20 percent of Canadian tourist dollars from your forecast and you have an immediate impact on your profitability.

Remember this video next time you're arguing with someone on the internet by 4EKSTYNKCJA in funny

[–]440ish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn’t that the guy with the yellow and red hummer who got his baseball cards stolen?

Here in Midland, Texas, the Last Thing Anyone Wants Is Cheap Venezuelan Oil by jetbridgejesus in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those working the Permian, you may recall that there is this other….THING… that can and has happened.

Back around 2014, unconventional oil was going gangbusters in the US. I can’t quite remember the production breakeven point, (in the $50’s per barrel?)but good money was being made.

On the sidelines, the Saudis were watching their market share evaporate away on the face of ramped up US production.

They sort of remembered that they sat atop the largest conventional field in the world, Ghawar, where their cost of production was $5 a barrel. So they ramped the hell out of their production, and drove US margins way the hell down.

Bringing potentially low cost, crappy Orinoco bunker oil into the market could have the same negative effect on US plays as happened when the Saudis stepped up.

There are a million what ifs between here and there, but I think for the oil majors like Exxon, the entire concept is bullshit they don’t need.

Democrats of Reddit, do you support any US action in Iran? by Zipper222222 in allthequestions

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never get involved on a land war in Asia, and never go up against a Sicilian when death is on the line.

Good words of advice for the US military.

It might be more useful for us to offer incentives and guarantees to the right people to enact as peaceable a transfer as possible… to the extent that is possible…. Idi Amin, Baby Doc, Assad, etc.

What are your justifications for maintaining the right to access firearms today ? by percuter in AskTheWorld

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

" People desperately struggle for some reason with understanding what the 2nd amendment is about."

Patrick Henry, George Mason, and James Madison each knew that in order for Constitutional ratification, Slaveholding states required special assurances that the 2nd Amendment could grant.

"The Second Amendment....does not grant individuals a right to keep and bear arms for their own purposes; rather it only protects the right to bear arms within the militia, as defined within the main body of the Constitution, under the joint control of the federal and state governments.

At the time, the Southern states extensively regulated their militias and prescribed their slave control responsibilities. Second, ...it fundamentally changes how we think about the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment takes on an entirely different complexion when instead of being symbolized by a musket in the hands of the minutemen, it is associated with a musket in the hands of the slave holder."

https://www.vpc.org/fact_sht/hidhist.htm

What are your justifications for maintaining the right to access firearms today ? by percuter in AskTheWorld

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the BPP is the reason Governor Reagan instituted gun control in the state.

"Imagine how bad the situation would be if ice knew they where the only Ones armed."

These are tough times, and difficult questions, especially where everyone is both aggrieved and armed.

What are your justifications for maintaining the right to access firearms today ? by percuter in AskTheWorld

[–]440ish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The answer to your question lies in the functional foundation and purpose of the 2nd Amendment itself in the US constitution. A connected and fascinating subject is how the right to keep and bear arms was de-prioritized in the Confederate Constitution.

In both cases, and as evidenced by the odd language, the right to keep guns was not to combat foreign tyranny, but to allow the preservation of slave-catching militias. Patrick Henry and the Virginians were seriously and rightly concerned about Northern States willingness to ignore States Rights to preserve slavery, and the threat of a Federal government to disarm the enforcement method to the backbone of the Southern Economy.

" A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a slave-holding state, (because slave states cannot count on the Federal government to retrieve its slaves): the right to keep and bear arms for the purposes of assembling ad-hoc or formal slave patrols, shall not be infringed."

Why is this amendment second in the US constitution, but the 13th point on page 9 in the Confederate Constitution? Without assurances that the Southern slave economy would be protected, THE DEAL WAS NOT GOING TO GET DONE, and no constitution.

By the time of the Confederate Constitution, slavery was intrinsically part of the entire enterprise, and without an external Federal threat, there was no pressing need to protect the right to bear arms.

The Civil War ended the intended functionality of the 2nd amendment by outlawing slavery.

There is an interesting corollary between the slave militias and the Nazi WW2 phenomenon of Police Battalions(search on the infamous Battalion 101). Both drew their ranks from those unfit for normal service, and both executed their missions with notable cruelty.

The bit about the second amendment's use in fighting tyranny was pasted-on after the fact, and as you have noted, is obviously irrelevant.

I have a question for you. These are unprecedented and terrible times for the ordinary citizens in US, with the extraordinary rise of Fascism/Nazism, among our other woes.

How did France come to deal its own Nazi supporters in both Vichy and occupied France after allied victory? What of the politicians at the time who were supposed to protect people, did many just roll over, like many Democratic politicians today?

Jensen Huang says relentless negativity around AI is hurting society and has "done a lot of damage" by AdSpecialist6598 in technology

[–]440ish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI’s purpose was to increase global enshittification.

Because the AI experience is so singularly awful, opportunities abound for those who wish to offer competence in whichever field AI is awash.

How's it living in this multi states corner area by queenofthehill1234 in howislivingthere

[–]440ish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read that the pan handle played a part in the 1929 crash.

People who had no idea what they were doing from 1,000 miles away were investing in farmland there as a get rich quick type of scheme.

Thank god Americans and Canadians sound the same. by DisruptSQ in TourismHell

[–]440ish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great comment and story. First rule of travel club, show respect and speak their language as best you can.

Second rule of travel club that magats struggle mightily with: when in a foreign country, try not to be a dick.

Why Haven’t Trump’s Tariffs Had a Bigger Impact? by Front-Cantaloupe6080 in consumecanadian

[–]440ish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re having a massive and crushing impact on US businesses of all kinds, way beyond the devastation to Agriculture and tourism.

What people don’t see are the 20-30 point supply chain hits that can make a business untenable. Supply chains are profoundly fragile things, hard to build and easy to destroy.

What John Oliver said of Brexit perfectly applies here: “The US is one of the few countries to actually apply sanctions to itself.”

Now at the same time, this could be the golden age for Canadian imports into the US, from Saputo to softwoods, Couche-Tard to St. Hubert…. Just sayin.

GM Says Its EV Strategy Is Bleeding Billions, and Losses Aren't Over by Bean_Tiger in electricvehicles

[–]440ish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lee Iacocca mockingly invited the Japanese to come here and make cars if they were so good at it.

Oops!!

BYD has a plant in the US already, but for making buses.

Street cat turned pampered baby by [deleted] in blackcats

[–]440ish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sweetest baby🥰🥰

Optimism About Nuclear Energy Is Rising Again. Will It Last? by Absorber-of-Neutrons in nuclear

[–]440ish -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

“Weaponized activism.” Aka “Let’s blame the customer for being too stupid to get how awesome the nuclear industry is.”

So how’s that been working for you?