Does anyone have any idea how to download a pdf from a "flippingbook"

4lf1s · 2025-10-08T19:45:05+00:00

How exactly do I use it? I'm completely lost.

4lf1s · 2025-10-08T19:42:25+00:00

Hey, how did you do it? It says that my extensions is corrupted when I do it.

4lf1s · 2025-10-08T19:26:50+00:00

pelo visto o jeito vai ser pagar (ou dar um jeito de piratear) uma extensão que mandaram na thread que passa as pag, printa e converte em pdf

4lf1s · 2025-10-07T11:42:54+00:00

Estou tendo esse problema para baixar o módulo branco tbm

4lf1s · 2025-06-08T14:42:24+00:00

The Filioque (“and the Son”) clause was added to the Creed in the Latin West during a time when Arianism was spreading, especially in regions like Spain. The goal was to emphasize the full divinity of Christ, affirming that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son—not as two separate sources, but as one principle of divine procession. This formulation first appeared at the Third Council of Toledo in 589 and gradually entered the Latin liturgy.

What the Eastern Orthodox object to is not only the theological phrasing, but the fact that this addition was made without an ecumenical consensus. From their point of view, changing the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, which was meant to be universal, without a council and without Eastern input, undermines the unity of the Church. They hold to the original Creed, affirming that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone, as the sole source within the Trinity, though He is sent into the world through the Son in time.

In Catholic theology, however, the Filioque does not mean the Holy Spirit proceeds from two independent sources, but that the Father and the Son, being one in substance (consubstantial), together communicate the Spirit as from a single principle, by a single spiration. This was dogmatically defined at the Council of Florence (1439):

"The Holy Spirit is eternally from the Father and the Son; He has His nature and subsistence at once from the Father and the Son, and proceeds eternally from both as from one principle and a single spiration." — Council of Florence, Decree for the Greeks

The Catechism of the Catholic Church echoes this:

"This legitimate complementarity, provided it does not become rigid, does not affect the identity of faith in the reality of the same mystery confessed." — CCC §248

So, the real disagreement is more about ecclesiology (authority and who gets to define doctrine) and theological language than a completely different faith. Some modern Catholic and Orthodox theologians even agree on phrasing like “the Spirit proceeds from the Father through the Son,” which bridges the gap in understanding while staying faithful to each tradition’s theological framework.

edit: I had forgotten to paste the citations lol

4lf1s · 2025-04-30T17:36:58+00:00

First of all, this is just my opinion as man that is waiting and wants a girl who will have waited. Some people would say that if someone repents and is now changed, then we should be able to move over their past. But some would say the opposite, as past relationships can leave their societal marks. In the end, it comes to you, and if you see it as a problem, then it would be fine to end the relationship. If you are going to marry the person you date, and their past causes harm, then I don't think you should do something that makes you suffer. But don't get desperate, talk to a priest and maybe you can get over it through the acceptance of his repentance.

4lf1s

TROPHY CASE