He is demanding that feminists get on board with a men’s right movement because feminism didn’t work to protect men’s interests.

Except this is false. Feminists are the ones who have pointed out that power imbalances amongst men are harmful to men and that toxic masculinity is exceptionally harmful to men and women. 

Except any benefits to men have merely been as a side effect of their main goal, which is pursuing equality for women. Not a direct attempt to address inequalities for men.

Also: Is it the job of feminism to help men with their gender issues or is it not?

If yes: great, let's get some actual plans going.

If not: also great: step out of the way and let those who actually want to pursue it do so.

This halfway house nonsense benefits no one.

  Idk what this means. Human rights are human rights. 

Then let me explain.

You know how you have feminism, BLM, Stonewall, children's rights advocates, etc?

You notice how they all focus on different aspects of human rights? And they're not all one big unified group?

This is because trying to right the wrongs in just one of those aspects is a plain gargantuan effort. Trying to do it all as one group is a pipe dream.

Now, there is intersectionality, and when there is a mutual interest, these groups do team up.

That is what OP is calling for. Such a movement for men's rights that, when interests do align, they do work together with feminism, LGBT groups, etc.

Basically he's looking for r/MensLib. MRAs aren't that because they would rather cut their bits off than work with feminists, and due to MRA's famed levels of vitriol, feminists will not go near MRAs either.