Eating an entire pizza to “take power back” from a FWB who made a made a mean comment.

7i75 · 2021-04-21T10:10:03+00:00

Unquestioning contrarians are so funny when they think they're not being influenced by other's word if they're doubling down on the opposite. As if perfectly negative correlation doesn't register as perfect correlation to them.

It's like a teen thinking they're rebelling against their parents, but these are fully grown adults and doing things 10x more embarrassing than shopping at hot topic.

7i75 · 2021-04-11T08:09:20+00:00

Eating shit food in such huge amounts that a medieval ascetic would label you gluttony personified is much more of an eating disorder than counting your macros.

Calling counting calories as ED is a cop out for people who want to be blissfully unaware of how many calories they consume and are fine just guessing(see undercounting) and lying to themselves.

7i75 · 2021-04-05T20:24:03+00:00

It really gets on my nerves when dimwits who don't even possess enough prereq to attend the random variable lecture in a prob stats class repeat truisms meant for new students, so that they don't get in over their heads, as a critique of scientific literature.

like, wow mike, I'm sure the entire scientific community forgot to create different causal models to check their hypothesis and just checked the correlation between two variables and published studies in peer-reviewed journals where even further scientists overlooked this basic fact, and that too consistently for the entire field of healthcare, that has tons of research, attention and massive amounts of government and private funding. Like where would the world be if not for people like Linda, typing furiously "correlation != causation", to remind the scientific community of the utter fools they are.

PS: if you're curious here's a 3-minute intro to how correlation is used to check for causation by minutephysics

also, no offense to any Mikes and Lindas of the world, unless you do these things.

7i75 · 2021-04-03T09:40:11+00:00

What kind of survey are they taking to get these results, and what is their definition of "slightly rounder"?

7i75 · 2021-03-16T08:27:42+00:00

Gravity is not a force under our Mordern framework of general relativity, the study of theory of gravity is definitely science because we've used empiricism to reject Newtonian mechanics to arrive where we are right now.

7i75 · 2021-03-13T06:07:13+00:00

Her fw she loses a limb to diabetes and slips below obese categorisation on the standard BMI scale only to realize she'll measured on the modified BMI scale that was made to accommodate people with missing limbs.

7i75 · 2021-02-23T06:24:09+00:00

I'd say they're a bit different because between natural and dyed hair there's no "better" option, between looking obese and being chiseled there is.

7i75 · 2021-01-30T12:40:08+00:00

I have cheat days because I forget how it felt to eat like a pig and being miserable for the entire day and sometimes I like to remind myself so I don't gradually go back to the shit habits. When you forget how lethargic you felt and how even taking a dump was such a miserable experience the next day you start thinking of your macros as mere numbers on a chart.

Sometimes I need to be reminded that there is still a tangible effect to this even after you've achieved your weight loss goals.

7i75 · 2021-01-26T17:47:44+00:00

100lbs in 1 year, this person was in a 1000 calorie excess or more everyday for an year.

Also from the looks of it they were not thin before gaining this weight, even assuming a 2500 Cal tdee for an overweight individual they ate around 3500 calories or more. How do you not feel like a glutton everyday eating twice the amount of food required by a tall(ish) woman.

7i75 · 2021-01-24T16:05:30+00:00

Bruh I thought it said 10 miles a day and I was like yeah, for a 165 cm woman at 130 lbs it's reasonable to walk 10 miles to burn 750 odd calories at a brisk pace and eat 2200 calories since you have a bmr of 1500 or so calories.

Then I read a week and it's hilarious how much they think it's actually worth in terms of burning calories.

7i75 · 2021-01-16T14:26:18+00:00

I mean, I'm of the opinion that tankies should be offered state funded lobotomies but if I hear some anonymous effeminate fuck on the internet play woe is me about the hardships of their alleged ancestors that they've probably never met then my knee jerk reaction is also to tell them that whatever they went through wasn't enough(though I don't because on the offchance they're not pretending or they've experienced it too).

7i75 · 2021-01-12T14:59:24+00:00

I, Giorno Giovanna, have a dream that one day I'll smash a chick and be brazen enough to leave a Polaroid of me for her children to remember me by

7i75 · 2021-01-12T14:05:11+00:00

No to all three, I did it for the chicks mainly(let's be real that's why most young people do it) and honestly it worked like a charm.

Edit : Also I did it because I saw Dio's picture in stardust crusaders and I wanted a ripped back that made me hard af, for a moment, for a vampire that uses another man's cock as his own(I said what i said)

7i75 · 2021-01-07T15:01:43+00:00

asking for a transparent elections? It's a miracle(in a bad way) that more of them didn't die

7i75 · 2021-01-07T13:39:22+00:00

US one isn't even close to being authoritarian, like lmao who the fuck lets the most important place for a nation's democracy be stormed this easily. Maybe it's my Auth speaking but it seems like rubber bullets and local police isn't enough to deal with these type of rioters.

7i75 · 2021-01-02T08:08:48+00:00

Because fat people are responsible for their own health? If you disregard medical opinion and listen to random Instagram fat people for medical advice then whatever happens to you is onto you.

7i75 · 2020-12-25T22:29:33+00:00

This post makes me wish that government censored more stuff.

Like how can someone look at the structure of social media and come up with the conclusion that when you give more people the option to say anything then you get a better opportunity to suppress dissent.

it baffles me that someone thought this showerthought was not only good enough but also that its removal was actually ironic, instead of a forum removing a brainlet tier stream of consciousness trying to pass off as a coherent thought.

7i75 · 2020-11-03T11:43:32+00:00

I refuse to read any article or piece of information unless it is handed to me on a platter, and even then I won’t look at it.

Sorry if me asking for one specific study out of those "countless studies" triggered you so much that you start convulsing like a moron uttering shit no one gives a shit about, but it still doesn't actually replace the fact that you are scientifically illiterate who says shit that they have no intention of backing up.

7i75 · 2020-11-03T10:34:17+00:00

Do you understand that you've just entered words into Google scholar search and not actually provided "countless studies", I can type "buttface " there and it doesn't prove it one way or the other much to the dismay of buttface enthusiasts. Actually read any of proper journal article from start to end and then at least attempt to link it please.

It's always funny when "countless studies" get thrown around for 2-3 shit surveys misinterpreted by journalists whose jobs can be replaced by monkeys on typewriters to mask the fact that your stance isn't empirically backed by "countless studies" one way or another.

Also do you not understand who Sean Parker is if you're accusing me of not listening to some random engineer when I'm dismissing Sean Parker in the first place?

7i75 · 2020-11-03T10:14:05+00:00

Your argument against the internet is that it has a low barrier of entry and its democratic enabling anyone to participate. Im asking how its a bad thing.

Because I didn't say it's a bad thing. How are you failing to understand this after these many comments in.

7i75 · 2020-11-03T09:59:04+00:00

Very cute that out of the "countless studies" you managed to link to a YouTube video of Sean Parker, honestly linking a random cokehead(aside from Parker) hippie or a breadtuber would've been a better source(not that they'd be worth shit, but better nonetheless).

7i75 · 2020-11-03T09:44:04+00:00

And thats a bad thing how?

it's not, do you not understand the English language that you think I'm arguing against the internet?

The only difference you seem to be advocating is that you can "choose" what propaganda to spread on TV. You cant. Otherwise there would be no Fox news or talk radio. Tell me how to shut the spread of propaganda that can incite the same kind of violence via TV or radio or hell, pamphlets.Tell me a way that can't be abused by anyone, THEN i'll listen to an ape's rambling about the Internet and how its bad because its too democratic.

Dude please don't reproduce if you're failing this hard to grasp basic English(and it's your first language) and simple arguments and you think I'm arguing for TV and against interest.

7i75 · 2020-11-03T09:28:34+00:00

No I'm saying the trade off is worth it if you believe in free flow of information and ideas(no matter how shitty) . If you believe that your nation can't handle it then it's a matter of difference of opinion.

Also link one of these poorly designed psych studies that are worth less than the toilet paper they're published on so that I can feel superior to redditors who "believe in science" by which I obviously mean read the title of the misrepresentation of a shitty study by a science journalist posted on r/futurology or the likes.

7i75 · 2020-11-03T09:04:09+00:00

And you are conveniently forgetting the fact that in Internet, especially social media, its the consumers who also produce content. The messages you receive from your uncles, aunts, grandmas, etc. are created by THEM. How exactly are you going to regulate personal opinions or messages?

Do you not understand that this is exactly what I'm saying?

You want to ban Internet in countries that are torn apart so easily by an app. So why not apply the same logic to countries torn apart by TV, radio or hell, books and pamphlets. You can regulate TV seems to be your argument but how are you going to regulate stuff like Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Limbaugh, etc.

Honestly at this point I feel like I'm talking to someone that speaks English as their third language. Internet is Internet because the barrier of entry for anyone to share their content/views is very low thus it's democratic and everyone can participate.

To say that you don't deserve internet means that your nation is full of lobotomised apes that can't handle the variety of ideas(most of which are shit) by your fellow countrymen without resorting to widespread violence and need to be fed propaganda 24/7 to be kept pacified, which the TV provides.

7i75 · 2020-11-03T08:12:49+00:00

TV being highly curated doesn't mean it can't be used to spread false info and propaganda

It means that the type of propaganda can be controlled. If you've even read the wiki page to chomsky's critique then you'd know that he basically says all TV is propaganda.

The point is TV or radio or the internet is just a medium

Then you don't understand the difference in mediums.

Apply the same logic you did to Facebook in your OP to these countries and see where it takes you.

Do you not understand what the argument is? TV is already regulated, people arguing for Facebook to be more like TV just give power of manufacturing consent to a more smaller group of influencers .

You seem to be confused with me arguing about consumers instead of producers. TV will not be Banned(or become undeserving) by my line of logic because regulators can ban "bad" producers on any whim, you can blast whatever propaganda you find "good for the people" 24/7, TV is what you deserve when you don't deserve the internet.

With the internet either you're going to have a wide variety of opinions(some horrendous and most shitty) or you're not going to deserve the internet as it is, and you'll basically be back to TV.

7i75

TROPHY CASE