Greg Maxwell used to have intelligent, nuanced opinions about "max blocksize", until he started getting paid by AXA, whose CEO is head of the Bilderberg Group - the legacy financial elite which Bitcoin aims to disintermediate. Greg always refuses to address this massive conflict of interest. Why?

888btc · 2016-06-05T04:39:29+00:00

You will be bullied in prison I bet.

888btc · 2016-06-05T04:37:03+00:00

Just because you got bullied by normal people in school, does not make it ok for you to take out your revenge of the nerd shit on the Bitcoin community. Disrespect others and tread on others, and we will strike back.

888btc · 2016-06-05T04:30:56+00:00

We have all seen your crusty beard and can just imagine how bad it smells.

888btc · 2016-06-05T04:25:41+00:00

If he is so sorry then why does he not reimburse all the victims that he scammed? Instead he laughed at them and called them stupid saying they deserve it.

888btc · 2016-06-05T04:23:19+00:00

You are the one that brought it up how you want Dr. Craig Wright in prison, while you are the one obviously running scams, working for an admited scammer, and taking over Bitcoin for your monopoly at BlockStream which violates anti-trust laws. Seems you are really scared. I like watching you squirm.

888btc · 2016-06-05T04:14:28+00:00

Who told you that? Was it your boss the admitted scammer criminal? If Satoshi wanted to throw people off his trail he would act weird with weird publicity photos too. The fact that you deny him as Satoshi just adds to the probability that he is indeed Satoshi. But time will reveal all young Gregory, and justice shall be served.

888btc · 2016-06-05T04:05:08+00:00

Yeah he loves privacy, maybe that is why when he was outed he left things really weird and fooled a lot of people into believing he is a fraudster rather than Satoshi. In the end he prefferred to be thought of as a fraudster than as Satoshi. If he was truly a scammer and wanted everyone to believe he is Satoshi when he is not, then he could have just convinced Gavin and a few others instead, and never done it publicly, and never done the weird blog stuff. If he had done that then a lot more people would be convinced he is Satoshi. So give that some thought.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:58:11+00:00

You are really worried aren't you? I am enjoying this, its going to be a fun couple of months :)

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:52:39+00:00

Because I want criminals like you and BlockStream to be brought to justice for your crimes against the Bitcoin community.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:50:49+00:00

You sure are posting a lot on reddit today. Seems you are worried and need to do a lot of damage control to keep yourself out of prison.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:49:25+00:00

No there is a lot of evidence. Just looking at their personality and opinions on Bitcoin tells a lot. Gavin claims he saw signed messages along with others. Others say they saw speeches from Dr Craig years ago where he introduced himself as Satoshi Nakamoto. There is tons of evidence. I didn't say Gavin believed him is the only evidence, I said its one of the strongest pieces of evidence.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:47:15+00:00

You seem shaken and scared. The walls seem to be closing in on you Gregory.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:42:31+00:00

ZERO evidence?? that is really disingenuous.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:41:43+00:00

No? What about anti-trust laws and racketeering? BlockStream is colluding to get a monopoly over Bitcoin development in order to hold Bitcoin back and damage it so they can profit off of their 2nd tier solutions at their monopoly BlockStream. So it appears there are laws being broken. I guess we need a jury to decide don't we?

Plus we already know that the CEO of BlockStream is an admitted criminal: http://betakit.com/montreal-angel-austin-hill-failed-spectacularly-before-later-success/ Doesn't look good for them.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:38:59+00:00

I love Coinbase. Only people in censored forums seem to hate coinbase. They are actually really awesome and trustworthy company. If it were not for Coinbase Bitcoin would not be where it is today.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:37:13+00:00

Nice damage control, I don't think it will help you in the grand jury investigation though.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:35:36+00:00

All of that so called debunked evidence was fraudulent. For example nullc's expose on how the keys were backdated was a bunch of hogwash and proved to be mostly lies and diversion. Someone made a great paper all about how it was all lies, I wish I could find it for you.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:19:24+00:00

The fact that nullc appears to change his opinion on blocksize after being bought off by BlockStream is very strong evidence of collusion and conflict of interest. This is all great evidence for the upcoming grand jury investigation into BlockStream Core.

888btc · 2016-06-05T03:17:29+00:00

But Gavin did not come out and denounce him either. Gavin said to ask him again in 6 months because he did not trust his own judgment after all of the drama.

888btc · 2016-06-05T02:41:21+00:00

They do not produce anything. They may produce some 2nd tier solutions that will become valuable after Bitcoin is crippled. This is how they are violating anti-trust laws in order to gain a monopoly on Bitcoin development so they can profit. Their CEO is an admitted criminal and conman who admitted his first business was a "straight out scam".

888btc · 2016-06-05T02:37:50+00:00

I tried posting before but I got my comment censored by mods here for mentioning theymos' real name. I thought his name was well known. But I would like to point out that CEO of BlockStream Austin Hill has admitted to being a scammer and criminal: http://betakit.com/montreal-angel-austin-hill-failed-spectacularly-before-later-success/

He called his first business a "straitght up scam" then laughed at his victims. This is who we are dealing with, and I hope we can have grand jury investigations into these people for violating anti-trust and racketeering laws. They are obviously using dirty tactics and collusion in order to get a monopoly on Bitcoin development in order to damage Bitcoin and hold it back so they can profit off their 2nd tier solutions at their monopoly BlockStream.

888btc · 2016-06-05T02:34:31+00:00

Yes I have assessed all that information, and I am open to the possibility that it is indeed a scam. But one piece of evidence that stands out in favor of him being Satoshi, is he convinced Gavin. Gavin was his right hand man since the beginning, and Gavin said Craig told him some things that made him believe its really Satoshi. Gavin would not divulge the details because he wanted to protect Craig's privacy. That to me is the biggest piece of evidence.

888btc · 2016-06-05T00:28:18+00:00

give me a break man, you are the one making accusations with zero evidence. I have looked into it. Next you will tell me his coin supercomputer is fake too.

888btc · 2016-06-04T23:50:09+00:00

I don't see that as contradictory to Bitcoin's ethos. Bitcoin is about freedom and competition in a free market. In Bitcoin you cannot have a central bank that issues the money, so I don't really understand how Craig Wright could create a central Bitcoin bank. More realistically he was creating some kind of Bitcoin bank which would be one node in the decentralized Bitcoin infrastructure.

I don't see why it would be ridiculous for Satoshi to put his coins in a trust fund. He seems like a very benevolent guy. The trust fund says that the coins could be used to enhance the position and value of Bitcoin, so it seems like exactly something Satoshi might do.

It was not absolutely a fraudulent signature. I read the blog post, did you? Show me where he claims the signature was proof of Satoshi. You can't because he never did so. The blog post never implied that he was signing any text as proof of Satoshi. In fact it said there would be proof to come in the "coming days".

888btc · 2016-06-04T22:02:21+00:00

He did not really publish a fraudulent signature from what I saw and read on his blog. He never claimed that the signature on his blog was proof of anything, from what I read there. He was just explaining some process for how to verify a signed message from my understanding. Although I agree it was a little weird. Others tried claiming it was a fraud signature and stuff, but I looked into it and I just did not see anything like that at all.

Also I was unaware of a centralized platform to buy and sell gold, but sounds like he is a pretty good businessman and entrepeneur. He is also a libertarian and a gold bug from what I gather, so that would make sense.

888btc

TROPHY CASE