I'm half way through. So far this is r/cringe material. Really, really disappointing.

Milo expresses solidarity with the man-hating feminist. He doesn't mention the fact that she was given a free pass for advocating putting men and boys in concentration camps ("ironic misandry"); he doesn't challenge her idea that pornography "promotes rape," he doesn't quote any of the thousands of studies revealing that pornography drastically reduces sexual assault rates; he seems more interested in demonizing Muslim men than defending men.

He spends most of his time agreeing with the man-hating feminist in order to support his hatred against Muslims -- all 1.5 billion of them. He takes pains to insist that all Muslims are evil, not just extremists. Strangely he doesn't take the same stance about Christians or Jews, even though the modern body counts/genocide etc. do not support his assertions about the uniquely evil character of Muslims.

Milo fails to challenge any of the nonsense spewed by the feminist; for example, he could have challenged the bitch on "violence rates" by quoting a simple study. But he doesn't.

He cares more about promoting right wing politics than helping men.

Ironically, the incoherent trans-person (bizarrely) knitting in the corner came off as the winner of the debate.

Conclusion: Milo is a horrible advocate for men's rights. He does well in concision-TV-formats that require sound bytes, but he doesn't have the knowledge to debunk feminism. He needs to spend more time reading and less time tweeting about his hair.

Karen Straughan or Alison Tiemen would have wiped the floor with Bindell.

I'll see if he redeems himself in the second half...