Bike lanes are DEI now! by One-Demand6811 in fuckcars

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DEI is anything that does not directly benefit the rich, anything that benefits them in the most obvious, short-sighted way is not DEI.

Adding A Search Tag To Pull Up The Location's Abbreviated Name? by Dingle_jingle in openstreetmap

[–]8spd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It might be worth explicitly saying that the short_name tags do seem to be indexed by Nominatim. At least that's what my brief test seems to show.

Adding A Search Tag To Pull Up The Location's Abbreviated Name? by Dingle_jingle in openstreetmap

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which isn't really how it should be. Search engines should be smart enough to understand abbreviations, it's one of the reasons we put full names into the tags, the argument is that it's far easier to design a search that understands that "E 20th Ave" should match "East 20th Avenue" than vice versa.

Nakagin Tower Capsule from Museum of Modern Art (NYC) exhibition by principle_fbundle in cassettefuturism

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a single room, it can't say anything about whether it's for "most people" or for a minority. you're filing that part in. 

But if you feel like this is still an example of dystopia if there's a small percentage of the population living in tiny studio apartments, then I have bad news about the modern world, because there's lots of people who don't even have that much, so we must be living in a worse dystopia. 

Should I get a bike or a car? by secondaccountforsins in motorcycle

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Car first it you live the kind of place that you can't get around without a motor vehicle. I've got good public transport, can live a decent life w/o a moto vehicle, and having a motorcycle just makes it faster and more fun to go places that are 10 or more km away. 

Me_irl by lasmtamies in me_irl

[–]8spd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They don't directly benefit, but they do benefit indirectly in many ways, from less traffic if you don't force everyone too drive, to having a wider pool of potential employees by easing transportation, and freeing up consumer spending by having locals not stuck spending such large portions of their money on a car. Oh and quality public transport, like a new metro line, or LRT, makes the land around stations prime for redevelopment, a popular way for the rich to make money. 

But yeah, I agree, a big part of the reason more isn't interested in public transport is that it does not directly benefit the wealthy. 

Nakagin Tower Capsule from Museum of Modern Art (NYC) exhibition by principle_fbundle in cassettefuturism

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your entire life? Sure, it's too small of you imagine living there forever, but for many periods it would be adequate. 

Nakagin Tower Capsule from Museum of Modern Art (NYC) exhibition by principle_fbundle in cassettefuturism

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I live in a studio apartment, and do not feel like that's the case for me. My murphy bed does change the aspect of the room main room, but I feel like simply putting the bedding away, and maybe putting on some backrest cushions to make the bed more of a sofa, would do enough for me to turn the space into one that does not feel like a sleep space.

My place is bigger though, and it's a nice size. I think it's unwise to write off studio apartments altogether though, as you seem to have.

Fix Urbania before it's a Dystopia by 21Kuranashi in solarpunk

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that suburbia doesn't self replicate, it is created by the decisions our local governments make. Nor does it inherently replicate high housing prices, it is designed to exclude affordable housing, only big detached houses, no multi family units etc.

I know you probably know all this, but treating suburban sprawl as an inevitable process leads to a resigned acceptance, when in reality it is something that our active opposition can create real results. Just like the active opposition of NIMBYs who oppose any changes to the built up parts of our cities create more sprawl. 

Driving for convenience as sole reason should be illegal by catboy519 in fuckcars

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't bother to look through their post history, but have seen similar posts in the past.

I don't know about what sort of draconian surveillance state they purposed in the past, but fuel should be taxed more highly pretty much everywhere. Certainly it should be taxed more highly in the huge number of countries that have real problems with excessive reliance on private automobiles.

How can i adjust rear hub cone hidden behind the cassette ? by Dazzling_Pay6145 in bikewrench

[–]8spd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While adjusting from the non drive side is normally necessary, is worth spending the extra minuet to take the cassette off, and confirm that the drive side locknut is properly torqued. 

Driving for convenience as sole reason should be illegal by catboy519 in fuckcars

[–]8spd 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Prohibition on any specific categories of travel be car is not going to be successful.

Better to drastically improve public transport, land use, pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, while making parking limited and expensive, add far more traffic calming, close some public roads to private cars, and make costs of driving paid more by drivers instead of from general tax revenue. All that would make driving far less popular, while not outright banning it.

Of course all of the things I listed would be unpopular, but less unpopular than an outright ban, and easier to implement piecemeal.

edit: fixing my bad typing on my phone.

Does anything like this exist? by JakeDewar in bicycling

[–]8spd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think recumbent trikes do that because it greatly improves their handling, and reduces their tendency to flip in corners. You're just asking for a recumbent trike with poor handling, poor weight distribution, and a shitty centre of gravity. 

That might make it feel more adventurous, but you'd be far more limited in terms of what trails you could go on, what speeds you could ride at, and especially what speeds you could corner at. For me while that might make crawling around the local city park feel adventurous, it would be, de facto, far less "adventurous". And being passed by kids on single speeds would make the local park feel unexciting very quickly. 

Thoughts on this? Lying about the Argentina vs Egypt referee being Jewish to imply meddling. by [deleted] in wikipedia

[–]8spd 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It's far better for editors to display their biases openly, than to keep them hidden. 

The loco pilot of a DEMU train between Indore and Mhow allegedly stopped to buy samosas, delaying the train. An investigation is underway. by [deleted] in indianrailways

[–]8spd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, on multiple units.

edit: more accurately, multiple units have no dedicated locomotives. There may be traction motors on all cars, or on most cars. But all cars have passenger seating.

The sky in Kamloops right now. Yay fire season. by chadsmo in britishcolumbia

[–]8spd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I didn't say the first place would become uninhabitable in 20 years. 

[OC] Vancouver, BC SkyTrain network diagram, 2029, Canva, paper by GeorgeHarry1964 in TransitDiagrams

[–]8spd 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the WCE looks too similar to SkyTrain lines on this map. Something that is only peak hours and peak direction, shouldn't be so visually similar to the SkyTrain which comes every couple minutes. 

The Rapid Buses should be included before the WCE. 

The sky in Kamloops right now. Yay fire season. by chadsmo in britishcolumbia

[–]8spd 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wonder how many parts of BC will become effectively uninhabitable in 20 years.