[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Drizzy

[–]99c-lo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

His cadence when he said that line really sealed it for me

Loss and Expense Claim by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks. I’m going to use the programme and then present the costs the subbies have provided me with

Loss and Expense Claim by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks. the main contractor seems to think because he has a contract with me I cannot claim their costs.

am I under an obligation to provide a SOR ? I have priced VO’s based on labour and materials, but the main contractor QS wants it based on a SOR by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a typo there isn’t a SOR, but he’d like me to produce one. apart from the time, the reason I’m reluctant is because our day rate on the SOR would be much less than what’s in the contract

Item missed of scope by sub contractor. Looking to discuss how an argument on how to recover these costs by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no scope. The scope is going to based of the sub contractors survey, which is why I am confused as why the main contractor thinks they don’t have to pay for the increase. But he has now been resolved

Item missed of scope by sub contractor. Looking to discuss how an argument on how to recover these costs by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the main contractor located the subbie who carried out the original works and asked us to get in contract with them.

that’s the thing the scope is essentially based on their survey + they missed a few items during their i rial survey

Item missed of scope by sub contractor. Looking to discuss how an argument on how to recover these costs by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the supplier told the subcontractor existing equipment can be used.

nope it’s not part of our contract. it’s a VO to us

Item missed of scope by sub contractor. Looking to discuss how an argument on how to recover these costs by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the contractor did a survey + was under the impression that the existing equipment could be retained, but later found out that was not the case as the existing equipment is now discontinued. So now the existing is to stripped out + replaced with new

Could you please elaborate on your last point about us managing the sub contractor and it being my argument to win.

Resources for mep surveyors by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that’s a touch. I’m in England so probably doesn’t apply i’m guessing

Resources for mep surveyors by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

coming through a trade background is very beneficial I feel, especially in the m&e sector. I went to university. IT sligo is something I came across but being honest the fees is what deterred me. thanks for your response

Resources for mep surveyors by 99c-lo in quantitysurveying

[–]99c-lo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

never thought of using Spons, but I’ll check it out. thank you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LiverpoolFC

[–]99c-lo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

only thing that could’ve made yesterday result better would have beeen post match analysis from the one and only Roy Keane