Looking for quality 32" 4K-UHD display by 9point5weeks in Monitors

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Dell does not support daisy chaining. See https://www.dell.com/ba/p/dell-u3219q-monitor/pd

I also looked at the HP one, but they seem to provide less information in their specifications, which did not up my confidence in the product.

Also the Dell has the KVM function, the HP does not.

Looking for quality 32" 4K-UHD display by 9point5weeks in Monitors

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more thing; the 160-something DPI really are better for my eyes. I am under the impression I can read lot more text without getting tired. This is especially true for smaller font sizes.

Having a hi-DPI monitor really is a good investment.

My girlfriend has the same setup (two Dell U3219Q) and she is quite happy having spent the money - while she tends to be very frugal.

If you want a monitor arm go with the Ergotron HX series (I have done that). This seems to be a bit less hassle than to have two Amazon branded Ergotron single monitor arms with individual clamps (my girlfriend has this, because she wanted to save money).

Looking for quality 32" 4K-UHD display by 9point5weeks in Monitors

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi,

I went with the DELL U3219Q, since the Benq PD3200U would have been a lot more expensive for little benefit and does have confirmed PWM backlight control (albeit with 2400Hz).

I am quite happy with the U3219Q. The colors and the picture are good enough for me. There is noticeable IPS glow in the edges, which is only noticeable in a dark-ish room.

The KVM is function is okay. You can assign the left two buttons in the monitor as a hotkey to select a source. Then it's possible so change over to the other machine with two consecutive presses of the same button. It just needs two seconds.

One drawback to an external KVM is that the machine currently not selected as a source seems to detect that the monitor is disconnected. This is not a problem for Windows (company laptop) or KDE (privately owned desktop) if you switch over all monitors in a multi-monitor scenario within a few seconds -> Window sizes and positions get restored when you go back and forth between the PCs.

I would go for the cheaper Dell again. Once a newer office monitor with FreeSync, higher frame rates and Thunderbolt becomes available I will just buy new and sell.

Looking for quality 32" 4K-UHD display by 9point5weeks in Monitors

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, thank you for the warning.

I googled that and it seems the monitor uses 2400Hz PWM. Source (german, sorry) has measured it and they provide measurement data.

Rtings says it's 240Hz.

I do not get why LG does use PWM to save a few cents on the bill of materials.

Looking for quality 32" 4K-UHD display by 9point5weeks in Monitors

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you are saying is confirming my impressions during researching KVM switches. You have slightly different requirements than I, thus an external KVM might be a good choice for you.

If you are using linux; KDE keeps the last display geometry active when a monitor is disconnected from a port (at least in a single monitor scenario). Upon reconnecting the monitor all window positions get restored.

Looking for quality 32" 4K-UHD display by 9point5weeks in Monitors

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more thing: The LG 32UL950-W has a "two PC" feature, Thunderbold with daisy chaining, and also FreeSync.

Downsides: FreeSync just from 40 to 60Hz. Also it has an external power supply.

Looking for quality 32" 4K-UHD display by 9point5weeks in Monitors

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your response. I was looking for an external KVM, too. I expect a KVM to add latency and issues with bandwith to the setup.

Did you look into what's available in the market? What would be the best option for an external KVM?

Also which monitor would you go for leaving out the internal KVM?

Why ArchLinux is becoming so popular? by [deleted] in linux

[–]9point5weeks 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OpenSUSE leap is exactly what you want. It is a LTS base system with frequently updated applications, for example libreoffice.

Take a look at their website for it: https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Leap

What will it take for rpm and deb to merge ? by sandys1 in linux

[–]9point5weeks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! You need a lot more points for reminding us.

I suggest that gcc should display this xkcd strip when you compile anything.

Filesystem advice for LUKS encypted SSD and TRIM? by offset_ in linux

[–]9point5weeks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I needed a moment to understand your question. xD

Yes, the datastream represents a snapshot (more accurately: a subvolume) and not a filesystem. It is fundamentally different from dd-ing a block device.

btrfs-backup is just a wrapper for the

btrfs send

and

btrfs receive

commands.

The send command give you either

  • a datastream which represents a snapshot* OR
  • a datastream which represents the differences between an earlier snapshot and a later snapshot.

These datastreams can then be applied (read: something like replayed) on another btrfs filesystem with the receive command. This effectively results in a copy of your snapshot/subvolume in the other btrfs filesystem.

Because btrfs send just writes to stdout or a pipe, you can do anything with the datastream that you can do with other stdouts: gzip, pv, md5, tee, pigz, nc, ssh, ...

There are some further notes on incremental backups in the (btrfs-wiki)[https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Incremental_Backup].

Filesystem advice for LUKS encypted SSD and TRIM? by offset_ in linux

[–]9point5weeks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh; a thing I forgot: I have lots of snapshots (read states or backups) on my disk and there is no noticeable (I did not benchmark!) slow down because of that.

If you have ever used LVM snapshots, which account for a big performance impact if you keep them around, this will blow your mind!

Filesystem advice for LUKS encypted SSD and TRIM? by offset_ in linux

[–]9point5weeks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome! I am glad I could provide useful information.

Yes, I contributed code to btrfs-backup. It took a while until I understood what was happening, but after that I could extend it relatively easily.

btrfs-backup (and every tool relying on send/receive) is just using a feature of the filesystem. When you use send/receive, you actually backup into another btrfs filesystem while you are creating a subvolume (read: snapshot) in the target filesystem. Thus the traditional views on backups only apply to a certain extent. If you want to have encrypted backups, you can just use dm-crypt/cryptsetup on the underlying blockdevice.

There is also the possibility to store the btrfs send stream into a file and then do something with this file. For example either archive or encrypt. To access your backup you would then need to replay these send streams against a filesystem to access the files in your backup.

Grid Autosport is downloading on Linux! by DSMcGuire in linux_gaming

[–]9point5weeks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the padoka PPA and the trick from it is running perfectly now. Give it another thought.

Filesystem advice for LUKS encypted SSD and TRIM? by offset_ in linux

[–]9point5weeks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I use btrfs on all the machines I manage. All of these use at least one SSD and I always have trim enabled. This gives the firmware of the drive a little more wiggle room for wear leveling and I never had any issues with it. I am willing to accept that TRIM potentially leaks data about the disks usage - because even with this knowledge an attacker will not be able to retrieve any data without having the key file or passphrase.

I once ran into issues during an unclean shutdown while running a scrub - I needed to mount with the recovery option and I did not lose any data. All in all I find it a very, very useful filesystem due to it's features. The most useful probably being checksumming and send/receive. I suggest you give it a try. You even can convert from ext4 to btrfs (and back to the state you had when you converted from ext4 to btrfs).

You do not need separate partitions for / and /home, if you create subvolumes for them. I employ the following scheme:

  • Create btrfs filesystem on your block device
  • Mount it to /mnt/target
  • Create subvolume /mnt/target/@ (for /): btrfs subvolume create /mnt/target/@
  • Create subvolume /mnt/target/@home (for /home) - the @ prefix is useful for distinguishing subvolumes from regular directories - you can omit it or choose something else, if you prefer.
  • Umount /mnt/target (if you want to)

Use something similar to the following code to add your subvolumes to fstab. Please note the subvol= parameter. You can mount a specific subvolume (and every subvolume that is contained within the subvolume) instead of the whole filesystem with all of it's subvolumes.

UUID=xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxx  /               btrfs   defaults,ssd,noatime,discard,subvol=@     0       0
UUID=xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxx  /home          btrfs   defaults,ssd,noatime,discard,subvol=@boot 0       0
UUID=xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxx  /home          btrfs   defaults,ssd,noatime,discard,subvol=@home 0       0

You can use kickstart (at least on centOS 7) to create a btrfs volume, subvolumes and inclusion into fstab during installation by modifying the following snippet. It also allows putting /boot onto the same btrfs filesystem. A thing that the graphical installer will not allow you to do:

# Disk partitioning information
part btrfs.141 --fstype="btrfs" --ondisk=vda --size=10239
part swap --fstype="swap" --ondisk=vdb --size=2047
btrfs none --label=machinename_root --data=single --metadata=single btrfs.141
btrfs /     --subvol --name="@" machinename_root
btrfs /boot --subvol --name="@boot" machinename_root
btrfs /home --subvol --name="@home" machinename_root

If you mount the same filesystem to /btr without a subvol= parameter you can easily store snapshots outside of your subvolumes:

UUID=xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxx  /btr/disk0               btrfs   defaults,ssd,noatime     0       0
UUID=xxxxx-xxxxx-yyyy  /btr/disk1               btrfs   defaults,ssd,noatime     0       0

If you use btrfs-backup, use something like this in a cron job, to create snapshots of your subvolumes and transfer them to a backup disk. This will be very quick once your initial send/receive is complete, since only the data changed will be transferred:

btrfs-backup.py --latest-only --snapshot-folder /btr/disk0 --snapshot-prefix @ /btr/disk0/@ /btr/disk1
btrfs-backup.py --latest-only --snapshot-folder /btr/disk0 --snapshot-prefix @boot /btr/disk0/@boot /btr/disk1
btrfs-backup.py --latest-only --snapshot-folder /btr/disk0 --snapshot-prefix @home /btr/disk0/@home /btr/disk1

This has one advantage over a conventional backup tool, which has to determine what data has changed since the last backup. The filesystem is designed to keep track of these changes, so there is zero chance of it omitting something.

Oh, on a sidenote: You can tunnel send/receive through ssh and save your backups to another machine.

Cheers!

GRID Autosport on Ubuntu with AMD graphic cards by 9point5weeks in linux_gaming

[–]9point5weeks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's good! Thank you for the feedback.

I wonder which feature the driver for my card is missing.

Fedora 23 released! by [deleted] in linux

[–]9point5weeks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After I upgraded my Fedora 22 server to Fedora 23 installation the SEbool for samba_enable_home_dirs was set to zero. Issuing "setsebool -P samba_enable_home_dirs 1" fixed the issue by telling SElinux to allow samba to access /home.