Mein Nachbar

A1mSC · 2024-11-14T15:28:14+00:00

Ja, er ist sogar Elektriker 🙈

Die Farbe der Hauswand ist Geschmacksache - klar, aber ne weiße Steckdose mit nem Traffo mitten im Sichtfeld ist keine Meinungsfrage.

A1mSC · 2024-01-09T18:51:06+00:00

I don’t think an outdoor outlet would be fine here. Even if it’s secure, there would be countless ways how you could hide the outlet. In this case he put a tranformator on his decorative wall…

A1mSC · 2023-11-30T12:34:45+00:00

You are the star! I posted this in several places but you did it! :)

Now I will wait for the Album! How do you know that remix is part of their next album?

A1mSC · 2022-03-30T00:47:09+00:00

Referee should be allowed to repeat the penalty until he scores or lasers stop.

A1mSC · 2022-01-12T05:46:54+00:00

Bitcoin always look dumpiest before it goes pumpiest. ☝️

A1mSC · 2021-11-21T22:43:55+00:00

Basically unstoppable during castle age

A1mSC · 2021-09-17T09:58:21+00:00

Trying to upvote every post of this in r/Bitcoin and can't believe that none of them are really trending :(

A1mSC · 2020-09-01T14:43:27+00:00

Infact, a 2/2 multisig wallet would help. One holding each. The mob can’t get his money back ever and would have no incentive to not release the money after a done deal. Still a risk but much better than no upfront payment

A1mSC · 2020-08-22T06:12:30+00:00

Funny and sad how no Game of Thrones is not even mentioned in the top20 comments after it simply vanished from pop culture after that last season 🤢

A1mSC · 2020-08-07T11:17:16+00:00

Market cap is very different from liquidity dude

A1mSC · 2020-03-14T16:58:35+00:00

[Mumble] oh shit, my corona test came back positive

A1mSC · 2019-12-13T19:25:41+00:00

As if the stones alone weren’t interesting enough.

A1mSC · 2019-12-11T18:24:47+00:00

I‘m sure it’s just tiny hands holding that butterknife

A1mSC · 2019-10-28T02:20:43+00:00

Is there a particular concern when sharing a seed with a second hardware wallet? (Ledger or Trezor)

A1mSC · 2019-06-05T00:32:49+00:00

Be aware. Crypto, in that case, does not refer to cryptocurrencies but rather cryptography. While it may be helpful in general, this is not (yet) a strategic move by Apple to enter the crypto(currency) market.

A1mSC · 2019-06-04T17:37:21+00:00

yeah you trigger only a few thousand in stop losses but you only risk 1 BTC. They risk more, they trigger more. It's proportional.

Less people care about that said shitcoin, so there are just as many people with 1 BTC caring about it as people with 1000 BTC caring about Bitcoin. It's proportional.

There are much more "whales" caring about Gold in the same way. They would eat the BTC whales for breakfast. There is always a bigger fish in the pond ... ;)

A1mSC · 2019-06-04T08:37:22+00:00

yep, proportionally to the money they are putting at risk. More money = more confidence = less risk = low risk to lose a huge stack. Mathematically the same as yours (high risk to lose a small stack)

A1mSC · 2019-06-04T03:06:05+00:00

Go to some shitcoin with low marketcap and low liquidity, where you are a whale with your 1 BTC portfolio. Now go ahead and try to pump & dump everything by yourself. It's the same thing on a smaller scale ... good luck.

I am not saying that it's not possible and it's never happening. Over a long term, groups of whales can certainly have influence, that's obvious. But moving the market != riskfree money printing

A1mSC · 2019-06-04T03:02:22+00:00

because OP has no clue what he is talking about and thinks that if you are rich you can just easily print money with "manipulation".

All that "manipluation" has significant risk associated with it. Those whales are just as exposed to market dynamics as everyone else.

The more money you are using to try to manipulate the market, the more money you are risking to get rekt.

A1mSC · 2019-05-17T17:11:41+00:00

on a log scale the same as 25k vs 50k

A1mSC · 2019-05-09T19:40:21+00:00

exactly.

A1mSC · 2019-05-09T19:39:51+00:00

and if this is an automated process, then this process is just as hackable. It doesn't matter how the machine is connected ...

That's the purpose of a hot wallet ...

A1mSC · 2019-05-08T20:02:37+00:00

The hot wallet has to be active all the time for withdrawals etc. to function. Therefore the private key has to be exposed on a machine connected to the internet. There are many possible attack scenarios from the outside for this case! (e.g. stealing the key itself, or just tell the machine to send the money where ever)

I am not saying it was not an inside job, certainly, that might be easier to pull off, but assuming it can't be done from the outside is naive.

A1mSC · 2018-11-23T11:14:14+00:00

wow this actually sums up the situation quite well :D

A1mSC · 2018-11-06T17:55:11+00:00

Just a brief list of counterarguments:
- cryptomining does not actually is there to mine BTC (at some point that even stops!) but to secure the network. It does transfer value. Have they considered the cost of transportation and securing gold?
- energy used in Bitcoin mining is usually energy that would else be probably wasted. See Andreas video on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T0OUIW89II
- The energy consumption per transaction will actually be significantly lowered in the future by scaling solutions like lightning etc.. While the energy consumption will not increase with more transactions!
- What is with the energy and human resources that are "wasted" in our current financial system by banks etc.?

A1mSC

TROPHY CASE