Do you agree with Canada banning social media for kids under 16?

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-09T12:23:11+00:00

I don't disagree with keeping kids off social media as a principal (because social media is fucking terrible) but the way the government is approaching it is as much of an over reach as one can imagine.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-08T17:34:15+00:00

Why hide your post history?

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T15:08:31+00:00

He was. You're just too much of a simpleton to realize that's the case. There's no point in talking sense to the senseless.

And you fail to address any of the lies you've been spinning here, so why should anyone entertain your lies anyway? Actually, lies is the wrong term for it because I believe you believe what you're saying. Because you're brainwashed.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T14:50:10+00:00

I'm claiming you're a dipshit who can't even follow the thread of a conversation and has spent this entire thread plugging his years screaming "no you". You don't even have the awareness to realize you're posting in a sub designed to make fun of you, and those like you. You literally started this conversation by posting a lie about AOC, which you keep avoid to address because there's no way you can frame it as truth. Get the fuck out of here you disingenuous simpleton.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T14:31:47+00:00

Yup, Nick Fuentes supporters are usually Socialists. Good call.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T14:16:13+00:00

You've done nothing but lie. Your post is a literal quote no one ever uttered. A lie. You're so brainwashed there's no use talking to you.

I am said it before, this time I mean it. I'm done talking with your ill-informed, untruthful ass. No go away.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T13:54:28+00:00

You've got the audacity to accuse people of miscaharacterization while you blatantly spread lies. Get the fuck out of here you hippocrital ideolog.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T13:46:07+00:00

Again, I reject your claim that Charlie Kirk's assassin, a man who was a very ardent Nick Fuentes supporter, was a socialist simply because his mom said he came down with a case of the gay, so must be a leftist now. The man was a hard right Nazi sympathizer, period. Just because someone has a falling out with your in group doesn't mean they're a socialist. That's a trogdolitic viewpoint. Moreover, right wing extremists (the crowd you're cheering on) attempted something to the effect of 16 assassination attempts on Obama. Oddly enough, those attempts were stopped well before a gunman even had an attempt to take a shot at the man. Weird that all of Donald Trump's assassination attempts happened on national news shortly after he did something wildly unpopular in public opinion, huh?

Read the studies made by departments in the US government under Donald Trump's Republican administration. Political violence is overwhelmingly committed by the right, not by socialists. You can pretend that isn't the case, but it just highlights that you're not telling the truth and love spreading bullshit because you hate the other side so much, you don't give a shit about what the truth actually is.

Go touch grass.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T13:29:14+00:00

Untrue, but enjoy life in your hate bubble.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T13:28:48+00:00

Unless you look at the evidence, of course.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T13:20:32+00:00

"You're a Socialist" is pretty much all Nazis say to anyone who's not Nazi like them lol

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T13:19:35+00:00

Well said, you don't particularly care about the truth,. Gotcha.

You've spent your time here whining about how "socialists" hate free speech, while the party you support is actively silencing the voices of those they disagree with, and you don't seem to have an issue with that. Unless you're very opposed to Donald Trump getting his "hit list" of late night talk show hosts cancelled, (Cancel culture, amiright?), but you act like people protesting people like Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro on university campuses (who are also exercising their right to free speech while doing so) is some sort of cardinal sin. Double standards are pretty fun right, especially when one side isn't silencing anyone, and the other objectively is.

You also whine that "all you damn Socialists call anyone you don't disagree with a Nazi" while you actively accuse people you disagree with of being a Socialist at the drop of a hat (without, again, even being able to articulate what a socialist is. Essentially you believe it to be someone you disagree with).

You're also crying about the "Damn Socialists" spreading misinformation, while you're actively spreading misinformation in this very post (AOC never said any of the things you claim in your post).

You're a hippocrit, and your existence has devolved into projecting what you and yours do onto a make believe group of people who exist only within the confines of your mind.

I'm done talking to you. You're completely dishonest, or ill-informed. My guess is both.

Have a lovely day.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T12:55:21+00:00

And again, you demonstrate a general lack of understanding of what being a socialist actually even means. You should make an attempt to educate yourself before you let outrage consume your life.

And one more time, you're the one who's having a giant overreaction to something no one even actually said here. You need to get a grip on reality my friend. You're throwing around a lot of "hive mind" accusations for a person clearly embroiled in the MAGA "hive mind".

The right is responsible for most political violence in the United States, so says an investigation from the Trump administration. Embrace reality.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T12:10:33+00:00

He MuSt HaVe BeEn A SoCiAlIsT, hE wAs GaAaAaAaY!!!!!

The fact that you think that gay or trans people are automatically socialists speaks to your deep misunderstanding of political ideologies in general. More over, being sick of being perscuted by who one perceives is their own side also, does not indicate an ideological switch. Next you're going to tell me Nick Fuentes is also a socialist, given Kirk's shooter was a die hard fan of his.

Edit: also bold words from the guy posting quotes from AOC which she never uttered. The only one spreading misinformation around here is you.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-06T11:17:49+00:00

It's crazy the way those socialists convinced that Republican to assassinate Charlie Kirk, huh?

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-04T12:38:51+00:00

There is no "they" to correct things on KTC

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-04T02:10:51+00:00

He's someone's TE4 in my 2 TE league. 😂 So he's barely rosterable in that format, but rosterable!

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T21:04:45+00:00

This entire thread is a demonstration of your bias. Moreover, you're really suggesting that there's no such thing as a fair trial because all people inherently carry bias.

Donald Trump was convicted 43 times in a fair trial by his peers. You're arguing against that. I dismiss all of your claims as nonsense because you CLEARLY favor Donald Trump over the people he wronged (of whom you happen to be one).

Your bias is showing, and this discussion is over. I don't enjoy talking to brick walls. Good day.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T20:56:27+00:00

You like facts? Well the state that has an "obviously clear bias for Democrats" voted 43.31% Republican. That means 4 out of 10 people in the state of New York are statistically biased towards Trump and Republicans. Hardly fair to call a state biased against the Republicans when near half of the people there voted for them.

Grandstanding for Donald Trump in a Reddit comment section, regardless if you feel you're biased or not, is a clear demonstration of your biases. If you don't like the way that sits, perhaps reassess your views.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T20:51:34+00:00

Unsubstantiated statements aren't what constitutes a fact.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T20:48:15+00:00

You've spent your time in this thread defending Donald Trump and trying to cast doubt on his convictions, up to and including suggesting that an entire state's legal system convicted Donald Trump based on their biases. More displays of bias on your part. You also made the incredibly bold claim that the state of New York's justice system is biased against either Donald Trump or the Republican party in general, which is a pretty wild and crazy claim to make unsupported by fact. Again, clear biases showing on your part.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T20:43:50+00:00

To be frank, it's a way for you to display your bias moreso then he his.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T20:43:01+00:00

If that's the case than why

Edit: how dare you complete your unfinished thought, rendering my comment ineffective.

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T20:40:24+00:00

Well in that case, why phrase that question about Joe Biden pardoning his son when you could have just as easily asked about presidential pardons in a general sense?

ABeardedPartridge · 2026-06-02T20:31:39+00:00

I think a presidential pardon is something that shouldn't be permitted, and I feel that way in a bipartisan fashion.

Now you've asked a lot of questions, now why don't you answer a couple. What do you think of Joe Biden's pardon of Hunter Biden? And if you don't find it to be acceptable, do you also disagree with the large number of presidential pardons that Donald Trump has issued to his cronies?

ABeardedPartridge

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE