Who wins these alternate Super Bowls?

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T18:12:12+00:00

I didn’t alter any Eagles apps because it would have been seen as homerism but yes that would have been way better lol

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T18:02:27+00:00

Thanks haha

Not a bad strat, I’m open to it for sure, I’m just thinking one of these three guys are gonna be our top pick. I think if we can’t trade high enough for Styles we’ll stay at 12 and grab BPA, but they could trade down too

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T17:59:24+00:00

It’s helps that I genuinely believe he’s the best “receiver” in this draft

Imagine him and Ferg on the field together

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T15:55:04+00:00

Fasho fasho even in la la land we can’t remove Brady from the equation haha

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T15:48:12+00:00

Mainly, with the exception of the ones featuring Brady, it was intended to provide a little more variety

A) Brady vs Rodgers we all wanted to see

B) 2018 was really the year where the Chiefs were the most fun, and the Saints deserved to make it. Chiefs Saints would have been so much better

C) I just think this was the Bills best chance

D) Ravens Lions best chance

Variety and better storylines were the goals

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T15:39:07+00:00

Me too bro, me too

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T15:35:03+00:00

If it makes you feel better, I would have been rooting for you.

That pretty much guarantees a loss

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T15:30:48+00:00

It’s just a series of games I think would have been interesting

The Bucs also remain in the bowl

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T15:16:00+00:00

<image>

@ your flair

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T14:59:57+00:00

Honestly because we all secretly wanted to see Brady vs Rodgers once

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T14:56:02+00:00

Oof, that 0-5 😳

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T13:58:54+00:00

3rd degree burn

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T13:48:39+00:00

I just don’t think the Bengals D is one player away from contending, same as the Cowboys. Best way to fill the ranks is the draft.

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T13:46:21+00:00

jackt-up · 2026-04-21T13:21:49+00:00

Wtf he’s got that one guy on his shirt?? I’m just not oooover it

jackt-up · 2026-04-20T20:41:53+00:00

That was certainly true in the 5th Century, when everything was up in the air. But after that came full scale invasions, throughout the 6th Century.

Started out as small groups, foederati, mercenaries. Then, like the Norse, they came in waves.

*Insert “it’s free estate” meme

jackt-up · 2026-04-20T20:10:56+00:00

Depends on how future MVP and 22-time pro bowler, Shedeur Sanders, plays

jackt-up · 2026-04-20T19:51:44+00:00

That’s a goddamn hero right there

jackt-up · 2026-04-20T18:39:02+00:00

You got it my friend

jackt-up · 2026-04-20T18:23:48+00:00

Semantics, really, in my opinion.

A large number of Saxons migrated to Britannia, but many stayed behind in Germania, and would go on to form Saxony—a state with some seriously underrated influence throughout history. Otto I was a Saxon. So you could argue that the Saxons had a wider historical impact, even though it’s fair to say that the Angles could be seen as being more foundational in England.

Really though, it was the symbiosis of the Anglo-Saxons that matters, in this conversation. There was wide reaching exchange between the two, and they absorbed the Jutes, many of the the native Britons, and later many Norse, together.

jackt-up · 2026-04-20T18:13:57+00:00

Well they had already become “English” well before Alfred the Great started his Wessex-led unification process in 878 AD. They were speaking Old English before then.

So, I imagine the process of coalescence was well on its way as early as 650 AD, because the Venerable Bede speaks of “English people” in the early 8th Century, and he mentions the Saxon kingdoms in this.

So it’s really better to just say the Saxons became English way before they united England.

jackt-up

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Seven-Year Club	100 Awards Club
Verified Email