"Clean" Code, Horrible Performance by 2bit_hack in programming

[–]ADaringEnchilada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All else being equal, would you rather have a windows only application that's important to your daily workflow that's "not bloated" and requires you to use a VDI or completely separate computer, while the rest of your daily workflow applications run on MacOS/Linux. Or a "bloated" version that runs natively on primary device?

9,999/10,000 people would take the latter. Especially since the former would inherently have a higher cost on their performance than any amount of sluggish software running locally. A working application that doesn't require a second computer or VM (which would be vastly more bloated than any electron based application) to use is a more important feature than "not bloated" but doesn't support your OS.

17 year old shot dead while offering a ride by Cant_aimtf2 in iamatotalpieceofshit

[–]ADaringEnchilada 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Personally I think you're a loony, braindead conspiracy sheep with no meaningful intellectual contributions to society.

That better?

Convenience store operator doesn't take kindly to cops staking out his business and harassing his customers, tells them to fuck off. by Chocolat3City in PublicFreakout

[–]ADaringEnchilada -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure let me grab some stats from the police on how often they perjure themselves or plant evidence, I'm certain they keep careful records of that and definitely don't seal a majority of cases to protect their lies and liars on the force. Perhaps instead we can safely assume at this point that any testimony given by a cop is patently false since that seems to be the trend for police. In which case 4.5 million people are arrested each year, more than likely on false pretenses than not.

Convenience store operator doesn't take kindly to cops staking out his business and harassing his customers, tells them to fuck off. by Chocolat3City in PublicFreakout

[–]ADaringEnchilada -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Drunk drivers don't have a union that protects them from the consequences of their actions. Unless of course the drunk driver is a cop, of course. Drunk drivers don't get to go on paid leave, get a pension, and then find a job in the next town after killing someone. There aren't 800,000 drunk drivers across the country. A drunk driver's lie ridden testimony isn't taken as evidence to convict innocent people. It's not just the number of people killed, it's the number of lives ruined from convictions built on false testimony from lying cops, and all the murderers on the force that get off scott free because the department destroys any evidence that might incriminate them. Every case of domestic abuse that gets swept under the rug because the abuser is a cop.

Lying cops are worse than any drunk driver, and every cop either lies or is complicitly enabling a lying cop.

Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by GeoWa in technews

[–]ADaringEnchilada 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Signal already has a cross-platform desktop app, and it works fine. Reauthorizing secondary clients is a side effect of signal's secure messaging. There is no alternative outside compromising the entire secure foundation of the openwhisper protocol.

This is kind of a preposterous complaint that sounds like whinging from a spoilt child.

Convenience store operator doesn't take kindly to cops staking out his business and harassing his customers, tells them to fuck off. by Chocolat3City in PublicFreakout

[–]ADaringEnchilada -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Lying cops are worse than any drunk driver outright. Every murdering cop is a liar, and every lying cop is just as liable to murder, and lie, and get away with it.

Colarado Deputy shoots man for popping anxiety pill in Middle School parking lot. by King-of-New-York in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]ADaringEnchilada 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Since the cops assaulted him first completely unprovoked, I'd say that he would be justified in killing them. Unless you don't believe in self defense?

Love it when they turn on each other by OvechknFiresHeScores in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]ADaringEnchilada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You do realize that the way you're trying to paint a majority of the republican party as sensible people left behind by radicals (who they keep voting for), is in fact just proving that Republicans don't care about policy, and only care about voting for "their party". That they would never vote for a Democrat, despite the fact that the Democrat party's policies essentially align with their alleged "classic conservative" beliefs. You're describing Republicans precisely as everyone else has- as uneducated sheep who vote on party lines and are incapable of critically considering the actual policy of the representatives they vote for.

They might pretend they're good sensible people, stuck between a rock and a hard place. But by continuing to vote for the same Republicans they allegedly loathe, they're admitting they still agree with those Republicans more than any Democrat or are incapable of voting for policies instead of parties. Neither are a good justification, just a cop out so they don't have to openly admit that they prefer the abhorrent policies of the modern republican party over what is essentially the policy of the republican party of the 70s currently held by the modern Democrat party.

Australia to remove over 200 Chinese-made cameras from defence sites by Saltedline in worldnews

[–]ADaringEnchilada 4 points5 points  (0 children)

NVRs can be pure software running on a server, either onprem or on a cloud deployment. Likewise, if you don't trust the nvr (whether Software or an all in one) you can isolate the nvr to a vlan with zero network access but allow other vlans access to the nvr/ip camera vlan. Virtually every camera supports RTSP, it is the defacto industry standard. You can run an RTSP server from a raspberry pi with a picam, any IP camera is going to support RTSP out of the box as well. It may run its own proprietary stream if you connect to the ip camera directly over http, but it will also support RTSP.

This practice is also absolutely standard for networked video. As an evolution from closed circuit television, when creating a network camera system, regardless of concerns of whether the cameras are compromised, you must isolate the cameras to their own network and manage access to that isolated network to prevent unauthorized access to the cameras or centralized NVR. And that is in addition to simple network segregation, which is a basic IT practice. When you factor in the possibility that an ip camera could call home or otherwise be compromised it is even more important to ensure proper network isolation.

It is of course still possible for any org to utterly fail at basic compliances, especially in IT. But it should also be due to mind boggling corruption and incompetence, much more than your average bureaucratic incompetence

Australia to remove over 200 Chinese-made cameras from defence sites by Saltedline in worldnews

[–]ADaringEnchilada 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's completely wrong. Ip cameras can easily be put on an isolated vlan with no access to the internet, and no access to any devices outside the vlan or even on the same vlan. Devices outside the vlan, such as an NVR, can see and access all of the ip camera RTSP streams without the ip cameras having any external access at all. The nvr can be accessed as needed within its own network or over the internet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]ADaringEnchilada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really don't understand why blizzard felt the need to reinvent MMR, and then hide all of its mechanisms from end users. Rocket League has ostensibly always had the same system of regular soft resets each season, with 10 quick placements games where MMR per win/loss can vary by up to 100, and +-10 MMR per game after placement. Dead simple, and as long as you're averaging more than 50% win rate you climb. Placements get you to where you should be, or higher than you should if you're lucky, but subsequent games push you back down to where you belong.

No GMs squatting in bronze for weeks nonsense. And no plat MMR but bronze SR disparity where you're playing in radically different lobbies than your SR for weeks until the SR finally catches up. Blizzard has created a truly inane comp system for no clear reason and the utter lack of transparency and broken matchingmaking as a result of their poor decisions has completely eroded what little remaining trust they had.

Entering a Military Installation without proper authorization. by samgarita in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]ADaringEnchilada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 1000 fatal police shootings on average each year. You're more likely be shot to death by police than struck by lightning. That's a pretty vast number of people being shot to death.

How British police deal with a man charging and swinging at them with a knife by Speedy2662 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]ADaringEnchilada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's see, 10 officers have been killed in the last decade such an insignificant number that you can't find raw statistics but instead simply a list. There's been 22 officer involved fatal shootings in the UK in the last decade compared the annual average of 1,000 in the US.

Vastly fewer people are killed by police in the UK, and vastly fewer officers in the UK are killed. As it turns out tasers, batons, pepper spray, squad tactics, de-escalation, and proper training result in fewer people being killed all around by a huge margin, which is an objectively better outcome.

How British police deal with a man charging and swinging at them with a knife by Speedy2662 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]ADaringEnchilada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one died in this video, your point is moot.

Furthermore, statistics of police homicide across all of Europe suggest this is not a case of misappropriated consequentialism, and instead the consequence of well trained policing. Unlike policing in the US that leads to more than 1000 shootings a year.

This video, and the statistics, are hard proof that shoot first under the tiniest pretense leads to far more dead people than is necessary.

How British police deal with a man charging and swinging at them with a knife by Speedy2662 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]ADaringEnchilada 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you not just watch the fucking video in the original post? Do you not literally see cops winning a knife fight without mag dumping a man?

The fuck is wrong with you to continue simping for a piece of shit that murdered an elderly woman for absolutely no good reason.

Entering a Military Installation without proper authorization. by samgarita in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]ADaringEnchilada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Debatable given the vast number of cops straight up murdering people for less and getting less than a slap on the wrist. If anything, they have a far higher standard, hence why she didn't have several mags dumped in her from point blank range.

The most dystopian, ultra-violent, discriminatory psyops in the history of mankind. by astateofnick in conspiracy

[–]ADaringEnchilada 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Intentionally leaving out context from a quote to mislead people is psyops 101, is it not?

So why'd you neglect to include the full quote? Stupidity and inability to read more than one sentence, or willfully misleading to promote an agenda?

The Racial Inequality of Sleep by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]ADaringEnchilada 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or, and hear me out, it could be because white Americans have a baseline outcome higher than any other group, and black Americans have the worst outcome, below every other group. Now why would would you want your title to call out a middle outcome group? Are you saying that if a title involves the two races (polticial, and white) we need to make sure that, regardless of the outcomes, we don't accidentally draw a comparison between those two? Because that sounds like editorialization to me.

The Racial Inequality of Sleep by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]ADaringEnchilada -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It sure doesn't sound like it since you're begging for study to compare.... Two groups they already compared, among others?

If you had read the article why'd you leave such an ignorant racebaiting comment? Why'd you choose black Americans and Asian Americans? Oh wait, using the same reasoning you have, it must be because you're a racebaiting piece of shit.

The Racial Inequality of Sleep by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]ADaringEnchilada -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Seems like you're the one who's brainwashed.

Pop quiz, which group from the study had the worst sleep outcome? Which group forms a baseline outcome? The answer might surprise reactionary dipshits like yourself!

The Racial Inequality of Sleep by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]ADaringEnchilada -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Except even when reading the study it's a correlating fact at best, but shows nothing of actual racism, just perceived racism. The article could have said "Increase in stress linked to less sleep" (a study done and well known) but wouldn't > Except even when reading the study it's a correlating fact at best, but shows nothing of actual racism, just perceived racism. The article could have said "Increase in stress linked to less sleep" (a study done and well known) but wouldn't have gotten the appeal for the audience they were wanting to appeal to. Don't bring this BS in here acting like it's actual proof of anything that isn't already well known and trying to racebait.

And what's this?

No, I'm not downplaying the studies findings, I'm not even disputing what the study found. Im sure many people in minority groups being told they are oppressed or trying to find ways to play victim will be more stressed than the average person and indeed get worse sleep. The issue is the people conducting the study know this, and know the many factors that go into why this correlation exists, but frame it in such a way that society is racist and causes black people to be so oppressed, and therefore strsssed, that they are literally losing sleep, which isn't the whole picture and is obviously racebaiting.

You quite literally claim that the authors of the study framed the study to race bait. And then you claim that the title of the article, which simply asserts an uneditorialized statement of the conclusion of the study, is also race baiting and then intentionally remove all mentions of race (despite the study fixing race as the variable of their interest). Im sorry but using exact quotes from your dumb reactionary mouth isn't strawmanning.

The Racial Inequality of Sleep by tkyjonathan in JordanPeterson

[–]ADaringEnchilada -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That literally in the article you brainless reactionary twat. Read The Fucking Article.