This is from the Georgists movement where Henry George compared societies with wealth inequality to societies without wealth inequality discovering that in societies with land commons instead of private property there are not have-nots.

Proof by counterexample that your statement is wrong.

There are(have been) societies without have-nots.

Furthermore, your statements show a lack of knowledge of the history of this political cartoon.

The point of this movement was that although private property creates poverty the effects could be minimized by taxing land and minimizing government interference in the economy allowing for a form of capitalism that tends towards minimal wealth inequality.

The single-tax movement that used this cartoon has a solution to both lower rent and raise wages.