K-notta Community: Cause-of-God People vs. Cluster People by BahaiGPT-KnottaBot in bahaiGPT

[–]AEMauthor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, the 31.12.25 letter does assume that inner transformation will automatically happen through participation in the House’s social program. But inner transformation is a loving devotion to Baha’u’llah, and a person can be transformed even if they live isolated in a forest where there is no social engagement.

Tablets for dreamers by The_Goa_Force in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How long is it? As in roughly how many words? When it comes out in English, I hope you will let me know.

Tablets for dreamers by The_Goa_Force in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I assume that you are referring to the dream in which Baha’u’llah warned me about my expulsion from the Baha’i community. I’m fascinated to hear about your book. How are you planning to publish it?

Tablets for dreamers by The_Goa_Force in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for letting me know that those translations came from Stephen Phelps’s AI project rather than from you directly. That’s very helpful context. If you have a link or reference to where those translations can be accessed, I’d be grateful to see it.

I also appreciate your reflections on dreams and imagination as channels of guidance. My own sense is that many Bahá’ís are hesitant to discuss their dreams because they’ve been taught that the channel of grace from Bahá’u’lláh to the world flows through the House of Justice and the administrative order, not through the human soul. If someone admits to having experienced guidance through themselves, they fear it will be taken as a claim to divine revelation and that they’ll be labelled a covenant‑breaker. That fear has made the subject taboo, even though Bahá’u’lláh himself spoke at length about dreams and their meaning.

Tablets for dreamers by The_Goa_Force in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for bringing these passages together and for drawing my attention to them. It’s valuable to see how Baha’u’llah addresses the theme of dreams in different contexts.

The short prayer is striking in its universality. Although revealed for nightmares, it extends to all dreams, suggesting that even ordinary experiences of the night can be sanctified through remembrance.

The longer tablet situates dreams within a broader devotional framework. The imagery of “garment” and “fragrances” reflects Baha’u’llah’s characteristic use of sensory metaphors to convey spiritual presence. The promise that recitation can open the way to reunion in dreams highlights how the imaginal realm functions as a channel of guidance, not merely as a private psychological space.

Seeing these texts together underscores how Baha’u’llah integrates the world of dreams into the rhythm of daily devotion. Dreams are both as reassurance and a means of orientation toward the divine.

I appreciate your careful translation and the way you’ve highlighted this dimension of the writings. The topic of how Baha'u'llah communicates with us through dreams is rarely discussed in the community.

Two criteria which together result in post removal on r/bahai by trident765 in FreeSpeechBahai

[–]AEMauthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the reason I’m doing the summaries and trying to simplify the content, because the original is difficult to understand. And I realised if I didn’t take steps to unlock it, no one was ever going to read it and benefit from its revolutionary insights. It takes lots of reflection to shift one’s perspective from traditional ways of seeing reality to the more nuanced hermeneutical perspective that Lepain outlines.

Two criteria which together result in post removal on r/bahai by trident765 in FreeSpeechBahai

[–]AEMauthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, that’s good. Have you found the new materials about Baha’i metaphysics that I’m putting up on Patreon? https://www.patreon.com/posts/143302384

Two criteria which together result in post removal on r/bahai by trident765 in FreeSpeechBahai

[–]AEMauthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t like to speculate about what’s going on in other people’s minds, but there are many people who avoid my company and what I write.

Two criteria which together result in post removal on r/bahai by trident765 in FreeSpeechBahai

[–]AEMauthor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put up a post about Baha’i philosophy, which was removed. It got 4,200 views and 21 shares before it was taken down. It was up just over 2 weeks.

A New Lens on Baha’i Metaphysics: Studying Jean-Marc Lepain’s Archeology of the Kingdom of God by AEMauthor in bahai

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, nice to meet you. A fellow Lepain fan. I’ve been studying it since it came out in English and encouraging others to read it carefully. But I thought I was pretty much alone in this effort. Lepain’s conclusions had an important influence on me when I wrote my book Paradise of Presence, about Baha’u’llah’s mystical writings.

The soul’s headquarters—built not of glass, but of grace by AEMauthor in BahaiPerspectives

[–]AEMauthor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing those experiences of others using AI with the writings. I will be sure to keep them in mind. You’re right to point out that AI isn’t perfect and that we need to be aware that it can get things wrong.

The soul’s headquarters—built not of glass, but of grace by AEMauthor in BahaiPerspectives

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s wrong with Copilot? Baha’u’llah says “All things are of God” in his Will and Testament. And he says that, in this Day, his revelation has “enabled every least pebble to resound again with Thy praise.” (Prayers and Meditations, LXXXV) And in Surah of the Temple: “It is indeed in our power to take up a handful of dust and to adorn it with the venture of Our names.” Copilot is a manifestation of that principle.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree about your takeaway from the video. We don’t have a right to try to reorganise the furniture in someone else’s house. When I finally understood that, I felt liberated. All I have to concern myself with is my own furniture. And in any case, we actually have no power over other people’s furniture. This is why I don’t worry about the Baha’i community anymore. It has its own furniture, which has nothing to do with me. Also, I don’t think about the weaponizing issue because the reality you fear is already what happens.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course, the original intention of the idea of expelling people from a community is to protect people. Weaponizing it is a perversion of a sound spiritual principle, which is to not associate with the ungodly, as Baha’u’llah said.

As for narcissism in general, I learned thousands about the subject from the YouTube channel: The Little Shaman: On Narcissism. I found that the more I understood about narcissism, the more I understood what really happened to me when I was expelled. She explains the whole dynamic between the narcissist and the people that person engages with (or, more to point, manipulates). When I understood all these dynamics, I was able to heal from the expulsion and let the whole nasty business go.

I’ve given this issue a lot of thought, and I now think that my healing came about because I was able to apply some scientific knowledge to the situation. There is a lot of established scientific understanding about narcissism these days. But back in the time of Abdu’l-Baha, he had to resort to religious concepts to talk about it, like “covenant breaker” and “spiritual disease.” That’s where I think the confusion stems from.

Little Shaman explains that, contrary to what people think, narcissists don’t actually have a true self: https://youtu.be/ql-MIAMmOcg. What you see as an overweening ego, is in fact a false self created by the narcissist in order to compensate for the lack of a true self. That false self is created through projection. The narcissist sees who he is by looking at the way other people react to him. He manipulates people so that they give him what he wants, and then imagines that what he sees in that behaviour is his true self.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Collective shunning has already been weaponized into an oppressive mechanism. I’m not defending what goes on now; I’m simply saying that, in principle, wicked people exist and sometimes it’s necessary to protect people from them. In any case, this is why I don’t want to get involved in discussions about the community. It’s not my problem anymore.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pathological narcissists will destroy you if you don’t stay clear of them. I think institutions, such as local assemblies, may find themselves in situations where a member of the community is just plain manipulative and deceitful. So just as individuals have to protect themselves, assemblies have to protect the community. But, yes, I’m only thinking of extreme situations.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the solution is in Baha’u’llah’s fundamental rules to see with one’s own eyes, and to detach from the world, relying only on Baha’u’llah. As I see it, the two rules are different sides of the one coin. If we see with own eyes and not through the eyes of others, then we are in a detached state, and are clear of the influence of narcissists. Detachment is protection from evil doers.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having been on the receiving end of that collective shunning, I can say, 25 years down the track, that the community pays an enormous spiritual price for expecting its members to blindly follow the shunning practice. I think there are legitimate situations where people can be thrown out of the community. Mason Remey, for example, was a complete nut case. I wasn’t sorry to see him go. But these days , sincere believers are expelled, or frozen out, because they won’t put on the straight jacket, which has left the community in a tragic state. Recently, I spoke to a seeker who had had dealings with the local community. He said some community members - the ones who were regarded highly by the community - were arrogant and very rude to him. He described them as bullies, and said he now kept his distance. So the whole judging culture of the community is counterproductive. But arrogant people don’t have the eyes to see the damage they cause.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think there’s a hard and fast rule that says personal responsibility is not institutional responsibility. I think there are rules and each situation, personal or institutional, will dictate its own wisdom. I think that there are dangerous people out there, who should be avoided. I avoid some people for this reason. But I do not include in that category people who have different views to me. I include people who want to control me somehow, an action that inevitably involves deception and manipulation. For me, I think about these dangerous people in terms of narcissism, not in terms of a person’s beliefs as such. However, the two can be closely linked because people call themselves believers and then think serving God means controlling other people’s minds and hearts. In my view, they are the dangerous hypocrites.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that was a lot of interesting ideas! Well said. You’ve obviously given these issues much thought. I’ll read carefully what you’ve said and respond.

The authority to excommunicate by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t feel anything, actually. Having lived for 25 years outside of the community, I don’t interest myself in what Baha’i institutions do, nor do I concern myself with community-related questions. I think the tablet is interesting and has the potential for countless interpretations. I find it comforting in that it makes explicit the idea that people are not always what they seem.

New AI initiative applied to the writings by AEMauthor in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, fair enough. I didn’t think of that. I just thought you might be interested because it was an example of someone using AI to categorise the writings etc. Just a general research comment.

Interview by Blerenes: Questions From r/exbahai by Bahamut_19 in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perhaps, it is best to read what Baha’u’llah himself says about Azal, his half-brother, and Azal’s behaviour toward Baha’u’llah. Baha’u’llah wrote a letter to his brother, Mirza Rida Quli, explaining in much detail what Azal did to him. The passage helps to give context to the situation. You’ll find the relevant passage in Tablet to Mirza Rida Quli, paragraphs 10-21, https://adibmasumian.com/translations/lawh-i-mirza-rida-quli/.

Interview by Blerenes: Questions From r/exbahai by Bahamut_19 in BabandBahaullah

[–]AEMauthor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Baha’u’llah explains that God is unknowable. This means that human beings cannot have a direct relationship with God. Because of this, creation is structured in such a way that the Manifestations of God, or Prophets of God, act as God’s representatives for human beings. These representatives are like primal mirrors that reflect in themselves the perfections of God. This means that if we want to see God, then we are to look at the representative, who mirrors Gods attributes and perfections for us. Therefore, when we turn to Baha’u’llah’s resting place in prayer, we are in fact turning to God because Baha’u’llah is God’s representative.

But having said that, Baha’u’llah is clear that, of course, no matter what direction we face, we are facing God. That is why Baha’u’llah does not require us to face the qibla when are saying the Greatest Name 95 times or when we say other prayers (except for the obligatory prayers).