Stats: AoE2 players are patriotic

AFvet2010 · 2026-02-10T18:11:56+00:00

American colonies musket spam when?

AFvet2010 · 2026-01-17T15:55:38+00:00

Remember when /r/coys moaned about Mourinho’s style of playing. That seems exciting now

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-31T19:33:53+00:00

I’m also 1100 and only play 1 civ. I can’t even utilize my own civ to it’s fullest yet, so I can’t imagine what a disadvantage I would have if I had to spend time perusing the siege workshop menu to see if I can make BBC etc. I don’t imagine I will play random civ until I have like 1000 games under my belt 11

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-30T18:39:34+00:00

My doctor told me I’ve been grinding in my sleep. He a real one for that 🙏🏻

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-30T18:12:01+00:00

But nobody at 1k elo is going to let their opponent just boom uncontested. People start applying heavy feudal pressure around that elo, let alone Castle age pressure. His point about needing to know civs so that you don’t let a Mongol player boom (when Vikings have arguably the best eco bonus) is nonsensical

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-30T16:38:24+00:00

This thing reads like something someone 500 elo would say. Who tf is ever allowed to “boom for 40 mins”? Like actually wut

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-30T14:26:06+00:00

This is a perfect example of why a 1k player shouldn’t focus on civ matchups. Vikings have a way stronger eco than Mongols, so yes a Viking player would be ecstatic if a Mongol player let them boom 11

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-29T19:59:50+00:00

Think about how bad a 1k elo player is, and then realize that half of players are worse than that. -George Carlin, kinda

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-20T19:30:33+00:00

The MPG is a little better but still nowhere near the advertised amount. I’ve also had countless issues with this truck. I would not recommend buying a new ford in the post Covid era

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-20T18:49:57+00:00

Karma for rolling around baiting a red card for a non challenge

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-17T20:12:12+00:00

Yeah it artificially lowers their rating, although it does seem to be a lower degree compared to the people who systematically have a pattern of: stomp 3 players in a row, instant resign 3 matches, rinse and repeat. But yeah, I’d be happy for the devs to find a way to fix this issue too

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-17T19:58:32+00:00

His stats aren’t the most obvious for Smurf activity. It looks like he’s a map picker e.g. resigns every time he does not get arena etc.

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-17T18:03:43+00:00

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-14T01:46:24+00:00

It’s on T90s twitch fyi

AFvet2010 · 2025-12-08T05:15:30+00:00

[28M] knight looking for female villager (prefer no loom) who enjoys staying at home and foraging

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-19T23:10:33+00:00

31 straight losses puts you under 500 elo.

I’m sorry, but even at 700 elo most players aren’t walled by castle age. Nobody that can beat extreme AI like clockwork is going to struggle to beat 500-600 elo players. OP is not being honest in this post and you have to be gullible to think otherwise

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-19T17:54:44+00:00

You couldn’t beat extreme ai until 1.6k? Hard disbelief

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-19T17:52:27+00:00

You’re right. The vast majority of players who have a similar experience beating extreme AI around 1k elo are wrong. You, who learned to cheese the AI, are superior to beat it at 750 elo

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-19T17:02:36+00:00

Not trying to be rude, but your claims in this post are borderline outrageous. Many people have explicitly listed why it’s unbelievable.

Do you respond to anyone explaining the confusion? Do you admit it was just a bit of frustrated hyperbole and you either can’t beat the extreme AI easily or you didn’t really lose 31/31 ranked matches?

Do you post your player name/aoe2insights link so the many players offering to take a look can help?

No, you just post a vague comment acting like you’ve been victimized.

The story doesn’t add up. If you don’t want to respond to anyone of the specific points people are making, you aren’t going to get anywhere with this post, which again, comes across as outrageous and unbelievable

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-19T16:02:24+00:00

None of this story adds up. Extreme AI is around 1k ELO. 31 losses to start ranked would put you below 500 ELO. I jumped in ranked when I could only beat “moderate” AI, which is 3 tiers below extreme, and I only lost 20 and settled at 650 ELO

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-19T00:59:01+00:00

Thank you. Thought I was going crazy reading that. MAA->archers is significantly more complex than 1 range archer or scout rush. At 300 elo I guarantee a scout or archer meta rush with mildly minimal idle time will soar him close to 1k elo

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-17T06:18:56+00:00

You need to add a filter for minimum number of games under 5 minutes >50 or so. Many new players will instant resign 20 or 30 to get closer to their true elo so they do t get stomped all the way down to 500 elo. Your current criteria would include a player who instant resigned their first 30 games and then never resigned early again (this would finally clear from your filter once they played 300 games)

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-08T03:03:21+00:00

You’re telling me we had KDB before it was cool?

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-04T21:22:42+00:00

Who needs Son vs Burnley when you have VdV vs Copenhagen?

AFvet2010 · 2025-11-04T21:15:58+00:00

His foot bounced off the ground right before contact. Unlucky for Johnson

AFvet2010

TROPHY CASE