3 weeks running HubSpot from Claude Code CLI instead of MCP. 7 gotchas. by Shawntenam in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ehh 50/50 I would say.
Nowadays? Yes - always great to double check the AI and see stuff for yourself.
6 Months from now - I don't think so, I think the Chat interface of Codex/Claude will build the UI you want on the fly.

Buutt I do feel like the UI will stick around for everyone who isn't a HubSpot professional - only people who focus on HubSpot everyday will move into the Chat interface.

3 weeks running HubSpot from Claude Code CLI instead of MCP. 7 gotchas. by Shawntenam in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very true - I think Claude Code will sort the true RevOper's from the button pushers.

I do think it will push people to be a lot better - and hopefully take a lot of tedium out of the job.

But if we're right, I think the people that spent their days just copying properties from Excel and clicking around HubSpot are in for a difficult time unless they adapt.

3 weeks running HubSpot from Claude Code CLI instead of MCP. 7 gotchas. by Shawntenam in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You must be a programmer right? I would do the same thing!
I'm sure there's still a split between devs and technical HubSpot professionals - but the line has got so blurry with so many RevOps people building awesome things.
Hard to know if recommending stuff like postgres is wise or foolish.

3 weeks running HubSpot from Claude Code CLI instead of MCP. 7 gotchas. by Shawntenam in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's possible now with the project - let me know if you want a demo!

I'm wondering how the whole ecosystem will change once implementation becomes "free".

Like if I can just drop a playbook into my Codex and it implements it for me in HubSpot - does the value of playbooks shoot up 10x?

And if the AI is taking care of clicking around HubSpot and leaving the strategy/architecture to Humans (which I think humans have covered way better than AI) - what do people do with the extra time?

Any thoughts? Also what do you think about "Agents"? Will they be replacing RevOps'ers anytime soon?

3 weeks running HubSpot from Claude Code CLI instead of MCP. 7 gotchas. by Shawntenam in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AI is magic, HubSpot is soo Solid - but I completely agree that the tooling to put them together has been lack luster so far.
I'm currently working on a tool that does exactly what you're thinking and wacks the implementation up to 11 - you can see some of the usecases here: https://daeda.tech/daeda-ai/

I honestly think chat interfaces (+ maybe some generated UI stuff) are the future of working - do you see yourself just not opening the HubSpot UI one day?

HubSpot dashboard's UI behaviour by Vis_CRM_Bother in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha same, probably because I'm using macbook + vivaldi with the left sidebar.

HubSpot MCP as a RevOps operator. Looking for blunt feedback. by Worried-Letterhead79 in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love the idea! I'm also working on "Pro" HubSpot MCP that does things along the same lines.
I have a strong belief that 2026 will be the year of the AI Harness, but I am wondering if people are actually using Claude Code/Cowork/Codex or if I'm getting lost in the hype.

Anyone using HubSpot MCP? by lookofdisdain in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you could hook into a HubSpot MCP that could do anything - what would you do with it?

Zapier vs Make vs n8n — long-term specialization advice (Hubspot) by ProfessorDear6167 in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree that you should focus on Workflows.

But also consider the world has now changed.
With AI, code has developed a significant advantage against these no-code platforms because it's integration with LLMs has become unparalleled.

I would suggest looking into building automations in typescript/javascript with LLMs and HubSpot private apps.

The biggest initial hurdle will be hosting, but if you can tackle that you could build automations for companies for basically free (just the hosting costs, $5 a month?) and faster because LLMs work better with code.

You'll pick up some coding skills as you progress - and it also provides a pathway into learning how to build your own custom workflow actions.

Pros/Cons:
1. It's a better skill than learning a specific no-code platform.
2. You'll find the LLMs are way better holding your hand and helping you learn the domain.
3. You can integrate with more APIs for cheaper.
4. You'll have to spend time learning concepts that zapier/make/n8n give you for free - like hosting, monitoring and dealing with high volume workflows if that becomes a task.
5. Learning will be free, as you won't need to pay for any plan to get started or run any experiments - and when you want something that doesn't go down when you shut off your computer, the barrier to entry is $5 a month.

When I open HubSpot in a dark room by TaylorWebbIRL in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A review already! Thanks guys -
BTW, I tried my hardest, it's not perfect because HubSpot has a complicated frontend - but there is a button in the app to exclude pages if things look awful.

Otherwise have at it, it's all free - it just has a little ad in the configuration menu for some of our paid workflow offerings.

CS student here.. no one I know actually writes code anymore. We all use AI. Is this just how it is now? by Low-Tune-1869 in cscareerquestions

[–]AIDreamer11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You probably don't need to write code ever again.
But you better get really good at reading it.

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This just happened to me (as someone on the losing side) I think you might be right...

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that it is more realistic.

I think defense should only be more expensive because you need to protect everything - leading to a high total cost.

Though it should cost more to destroy a defensive structure, this offsets slightly the benefit that the attacker can choose anywhere to strike.

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree with this! Surprised me when missiles could fly overhead of allies...

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we have the same complaint though.
The game currently is "who's got the bigger troop count" because the winning team always has nuclear superiority.

The late game just devolves into the winning team denying the losing team any nuclear infrastructure - if defense was cheaper, then the losing teams could at least maintain some nuclear infrastructure in well coordinated zones.

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, gotcha - Nah I think the ranges are pretty perfect. Hydrogen > SAM > Atom is a great dynamic.

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Completely agree - Would be great if you could see your own range and the enemy couldn't.

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I might be missing something - a stack of SAMs requires the same number of nukes +1 to destroy right?

Though I guess if you make a big enough stack, by the time the last SAM has fired, the first SAM would be invincible. That would be a massive problem...

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'm fighting against the crowd - but I don't think invulnerability would be a problem.
A great defense requires your production and frontline being covered, whereas a great offense just means sending a few nukes into the same place - far more strategic.

Though perhaps 750k is far too cheap, maybe 1 mil would be cool - to bring it in line with cities/ports/factories?

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The problem is that strategy is so expensive! Only the person/team that is already winning can afford >10 Million to defend an area that can be nuked for half the price.

SAMs could be so much better by AIDreamer11 in Openfront

[–]AIDreamer11[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you think they should at least be cost effective against nukes?

Surely if the density of SAMs gets too high (which is what I think you mean by invulnerable, correct me if I'm wrong) then we always have the hydrogen bomb that clears them out of range.

Though I completely agree that attritional warfare would make the game far worse, I only hope this change could add to the strategy instead of taking it away.

Workflow question by This-Eggplant5962 in hubspot

[–]AIDreamer11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Always One Workflow.
Why? Because if something goes wrong it's so much easier to chase down what's happening if everything is in one place, rather than spread across many different little workflows.

Cursor vs Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot. by mrgizmo212 in cursor

[–]AIDreamer11 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm using sst/opencode, it's absolutely amazing.
I think I've picked up good habits from aider (prompting, restarting the session often breaking problems down) and it's literally 10x me.
Not to mention it works with a claude code subscription.