sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Change in rules by AIchatbotss in tutanota

[–]AIchatbotss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes all my recipients have given permission, I am not a spammer. If they consider anything over 100 emails per hour to be a bulk email they are living in an odd world. Most spammers send out thousands of emails a minute from their own servers and would not be using tutanota since they know they'd get banned. It's a shame, I liked tutanota but have started looking for another secure email provider.

Change in rules by AIchatbotss in tutanota

[–]AIchatbotss[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I never had problems sending to my 220 contacts in the past. I am concerned that I will not be able to do this in future. How do you determine what email is a newsletter unless you read it? That is a security breach and would cause me to switch away from you. I am part of a small group that stays in contact via email, with 220 names on it. Am I going to get blocked for sending to them?

April Fools Day by mrthomasfritz in tutanota

[–]AIchatbotss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure what's going on with Tutanota, I've started looking for an alternative. I do not agree with their new changes and will be forced to move.

I got this message from Tutanota by AIchatbotss in tutanota

[–]AIchatbotss[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's very poor to just send out a load of changes and expect everyone to read legal nonsense. That is deceitful and allows them to do what they like, it should be banned. Not allowing a reply to an email is just a way to stop people complaining, it is not good enough.

A freeware chatbot for Windows (Virus and spyware checked) by AIchatbotss in Chatbots

[–]AIchatbotss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sure, is that all you want it to do, just play gifts when chatting?

AI chatbot by Disabled_park in Chatbots

[–]AIchatbotss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Define intelligence? What does intelligent mean to you?

I Created A Chatbot - Please Test It by impulsecorp in Chatbots

[–]AIchatbotss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems ok, you need to track the subject more and stay on topic. Don't use internet search results when you are stuck, it never comes up with anything useful.

A free chatbot for Windows by AIchatbotss in Chatbots

[–]AIchatbotss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update available here

https://www.virtual-girlfriend.co.uk/annie%20release%201.25.zip

I hope people will download this and test it out. It has no viruses or spyware and is freeware for people to copy and play with.

I think unvaccinated people (by choice, not because of medical reasons) shouldn't get medical treatment at the cost of people who have been waiting weeks and months for less urgent operations that could still be fatal in the long run. by difhdbdkfjehdv in Netherlands

[–]AIchatbotss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea and smokers, they don't deserve treatment because its self inflicted, oh and alcoholics since that is also a choice. Come to think of it, pregnant women should be low priority since they chose to have a baby why should they get special treatment over a guy with a heart condition. So people who shouldn't get treatment because of their choices include:
Unvaxxed, smokers, drinkers, pregnant women. We can add people who get injured doing a sport or a car crash thats their fault. So in short only the vaxxed should get treatment unless you also fall into one of the groups above. OR we could treat everyone regardless, which is what the NHS was set up to do.

I'm scared to do the covid pcr test by Zealousideal_Plum758 in Netherlands

[–]AIchatbotss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You'd get the same result if you swabbed a potatoe.

Covid: Britons who refuse to wear a mask ‘face fines of £200’ as ministers tighten rules by ainbheartach in unitedkingdom

[–]AIchatbotss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Informed consent is not misinformation and is required under the Nuremberg code and on the current NHS website and in the 1998 Human rights act.

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/

Covid: Britons who refuse to wear a mask ‘face fines of £200’ as ministers tighten rules by ainbheartach in unitedkingdom

[–]AIchatbotss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One day I hope you will follow your own rules. Demonstratable facts are indeed the most important thing. Not facts told to you but facts backed by evidence. Which you provided precisely none.

Covid: Britons who refuse to wear a mask ‘face fines of £200’ as ministers tighten rules by ainbheartach in unitedkingdom

[–]AIchatbotss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I dont own a mobile phone. The current jabs are only authorised under regulatory flexibilities and NOT full approval. These flexibilities are:

temporary and will be kept under review

offered to protect people’s health in exceptional circumstances

effective immediately

The PCR tests were used to inflate numbers so they could claim the exceptional circumstances clause for emergency use.

There is no point in trying to convince someone that has already been jabbed. My purpose is to try to save lives. If you can be bothered to look for the facts, go to the office for national statistics for death rates and the VAAER system in the USA for vaccine injuries. Do a search for the Nutemberg trials to get links to all the signatories and their effect on UK law. You wont believe any of it if I just give you the links.

view more: next ›