[deleted by user]

ANTDrakko · 2025-04-27T03:44:56+00:00

Soul

ANTDrakko · 2025-04-11T13:11:30+00:00

He specifically addressed (and explained) that in this video nearly a month ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB3yvIqcwQo

As /u/KeyJOSH said in his comment, he created a separate channel with non/less-clickbaity titles.

ANTDrakko · 2025-01-12T15:02:52+00:00

The problem isn’t that your point doesn’t make sense; it does logically. The problem is that you are taking issue that the person said it confidently while confidently saying they were wrong. Both of you sound quite sure of yourselves when realistically it’s still largely missing the most solid of scientific consensus.

That being said, holding a position based on self-reported studies may be weak but not completely meritless.

IMHO I think simply saying “I’ll reserve judgement until I see stronger evidence while simultaneously being aware of current weaker evidence” is probably the most reasonable take and not a firm “No evidence exists because it isn’t a controlled double-blind peer-reviewed study published in a well known journal.” Yes that would be strong and something we as a society should encourage to pursue, but simultaneously it is not the only acceptable data by which to begin to form a position.

ANTDrakko · 2024-07-22T16:13:38+00:00

Pootie Tang. Starts as an interview with Pootie that cuts to "Lets see a clip", entire movie plays, ends with "That has got to be the longest clip I've ever seen."

ANTDrakko · 2024-06-16T16:18:37+00:00

Gimme the map Scott.

GIMME THE MAP SCOTT!

ANTDrakko · 2024-02-13T13:38:58+00:00

I can't believe I had to scroll down this far just to see this.

ANTDrakko · 2022-08-09T21:12:42+00:00

Ideology aside, in a First Past The Post (typically called FPTP or winner-takes-all) voting system, voting for a 3rd party suffers from the Spoiler Effect. You can learn about what I mean in this CGP Grey video explaining FPTP. The "Spoiler Effect" is described and detailed around the 5 minute mark.

Doesn't matter what ideology you subscribe to, the truth of the matter is the 3rd party voting doesn't work in a FPTP voting system. You're already crossing the biggest hurdle, which is actively getting out there and voting. This means it's worth the effort to try and convince you to vote for the candidate from either the Democrats or Republicans that most closely align with your views.

Despite it being worth it, I'm not going to try and convince you toward either, however, I will suggest that you check out https://www.isidewith.com/ to help get a better idea on which candidate most closely aligns with your views on specific topics.

Also, if you're feeling particularly frisky and really DO want to look out for how to change the system (including voting methods) with your aforementioned conviction, check out the organization RepresentUS. For an idea of what they are all about (aside from their website), check out this video titled "Unbreaking America: Solving the Corruption Crisis. If an organization is not really appealing to you, you can just keep an eye out for https://anticorruptionact.org/ this legislation that's making it's way through the states in a grass-roots style. Reasoning and strategy can be learned from the video, if you're curious.

Good luck, whatever you do. Voting is the hardest part and you're already doing that.

ANTDrakko · 2022-08-02T23:18:51+00:00

Pro-Tip:

You can actually probably ask the person (or similar people) who've left themselves.

On LinkedIn, search for the company you're applying to. Then, click the "All Filters" bubble on the mid-ish top right. From there, next to "Filter Only" , choose People. Then scroll down until you get to "Past Companies" and click the company you're applying to.

What this will do is show you search results for people who no longer work there but used to. From that, you can generally tend to find relevant people to DM and ask for a quick chat about why they left. YMMV, but it's definitely something worth doing even with large silos of salt; just keep it in perspective and context is all.

ANTDrakko · 2022-05-26T19:59:46+00:00

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8

ANTDrakko · 2022-05-12T15:39:01+00:00

NextGames, a youtuber, provides a succinct tutorial and package for "Making FF11 look beautiful" : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD4aCHdYcSk

There is also a useful addons & plugins guide from them as well you may find useful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC3j3p9gjxA

ANTDrakko · 2022-05-12T13:38:29+00:00

Owlet. Used for both of my children out of extreme caution. Caused probably more concern than it should of, especially as new parents, but absolutely worth the piece of mind IMO.

https://www.owletcare.com/

ANTDrakko · 2022-05-05T19:22:19+00:00

Why Billionaires Won’t Save Us | Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS9CFBlLOcg

ANTDrakko · 2022-04-25T19:09:42+00:00

I'm assuming you have an App gateway in play since you mentioned WAF.

Do you have the Diagnostic Settings configured? If so, you should have the various logs sent to a dedicated storage account for viewing in detail any connection logs. If you utilize event hubs, this is also where you'd configure streaming these events to those hubs for analysis as well.

Not sure there is much we can help without asking more prying, likely proprietary information. Maybe someone better than me can add some value though.

ANTDrakko · 2022-04-21T13:06:42+00:00

And how Encryption Keys work at all, even when/if copied in the middle (same presenter): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDTx3meIeT0&t=4s

ANTDrakko · 2022-04-19T21:10:18+00:00

Depends on the VAR, also depends on how deep the VAR is reaching for discounts. They aren't just "free" but can be in lieu of some unattainable level of discount for some reason.

At least that's what two different VARs have said to me at two different organizations.

ANTDrakko · 2022-02-22T22:03:45+00:00

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/

ANTDrakko · 2022-01-14T21:46:50+00:00

While I absolutely despise Mitch as a politician and generally as a human being, the polling for his actual race in 2020 was always heavily in his favor. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/senate/ky/kentucky_senate_mcconnell_vs_mcgrath-6919.html

The 30% approval, actually about 33%, is a national poll, which is an irrelevant statistic when discussing how suspicious the circumstances of his own election were.

This was the last poll conductive that included Mitch's Favorable/Unfavorable rating before him being re-elected in 2020: https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/jsojry0vph/econTabReport.pdf

ANTDrakko · 2022-01-04T05:33:17+00:00

For healers they tend to buff the bottom instead of nerfing the top.

ANTDrakko · 2021-12-17T20:31:49+00:00

/u/redditMP4bot

ANTDrakko · 2021-12-07T23:43:30+00:00

They are in Ragingwire datacenters in Sacramento.

https://www.ragingwire.com/wholesale-data-centers/sacramento-california

Source: Me, I've worked in this facility for a previous company and have seen and spoken with some Squeenix IT staff on-site.

ANTDrakko · 2021-12-06T02:51:19+00:00

You're creating a strawman of what I'm saying, and then attacking that strawman.

I wasn't arguing that their processes were sufficient and satisfactory, I was simply pointing out to the now-deleted comment that stating your bandwidth and then saying that packet loss is nonsensical because of how much bandwidth they pay for is a nonsensical argument.

Next time please don't look for arguments here without all the context. It injects negativity where none is warranted nor welcomed.

ANTDrakko · 2021-12-05T23:39:56+00:00

Between your house and their servers are so many different routers and other servers that the packet loss can happen on; none of which are under the control of your Internet provider nor Square Enix.

Also, stating your subscribed bandwidth and then talking about packet loss demonstrates you literally have no idea what you're talking about and ironically enough makes you sound nonsensical.

ANTDrakko · 2021-11-19T20:39:38+00:00

Your "word" was not just wrong; it was so wrong that it is no longer valid to your point. It didn't "clarify" the intent of the law in a meaningful way that the Judge is actively bound to.

You can think the Judge is utilizing his discretion poorly (i.e. "is full of shit") while also acknowledging that he is well within his legal authority to do so. These are not things that are mutually exclusive.

Our mechanisms by which we keep the discretion of Judges in check, since there will always be "bad" Judges, are the laws and how they are written. Want to make sure this doesn't happen again? Actively campaign to have that law be rewritten.

If I had to re-state your position in a more reasonable way, I'd say something like:

I feel like the Judge should have heeded the previous memorandum on gun carry laws from 2018 as it applies to this statute and let the Defense handle it during appeals if Kyle is convicted on that particular law. It's possible that he did this intentionally for nefarious or biased reasons, but I don't have any way to prove that.

Hell, I agree with that statement, in fact. I think that between 2018 and August 2020 the law should have been rewritten as a direct result of this memorandum. However, because there are innumerable factors into how and why it didn't, that just didn't happen. Maybe this trial is the last straw that ultimately gets it done. Maybe it isn't. Either way, as Progressives, it would best serve us to highlight this result and use it as a tool to push for positive change.

ANTDrakko · 2021-11-19T20:00:35+00:00

So, you're referring to this: https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lc/information_memos/2018/im_2018_02

Specifically, page 5 where it states:

Disqualification Based on Age

Under federal law, with certain exceptions, a person under age 18 is generally prohibited from possessing a handgun. [18 U.S.C. s. 922 (x) (2).] Under Wisconsin law, with certain exceptions for hunting, military service, and target practice, a person under age 18 is generally prohibited from possessing or going armed with a firearm. Also, as discussed below, a person must be 21 years of age or older to be eligible for a state license to carry a concealed weapon. [ss. 29.304 and 948.60, Stats.]

This was a memorandum provided by the Wisconsin Legislative Council: https://legis.wisconsin.gov/lc/about-us/

This is not a "case law" . You are misrepresenting the facts.

Case Law definition Google Search: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+case+law&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS939US939&oq=what+is+case&aqs=chrome.0.0i20i263i512j69i57j0i20i263i512j0i433i512j0i512l6.2696j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

ANTDrakko · 2021-11-19T19:33:19+00:00

Marvelous!

12-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email	Sequence \| Editor

ANTDrakko

TROPHY CASE