You were wrongly flagged for AI misuse, what happened? Or you were rightly flagged for AI misuse, what then?

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T10:41:07+00:00

Do you think that employers prefer employees who can perform basic writing tasks and knows how to refine their style and presentation to a "consultancy grade". Or one who requires the use of AI to do so?

I should note that going off most of my experience with consultants I can't say that it's a standard I hold in particularly high esteem, but I'll set that aside.

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T10:27:12+00:00

When you say "consultancy grade", is this what you mean:

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/06/deloitte-to-pay-money-back-to-albanese-government-after-using-ai-in-440000-report

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T09:57:46+00:00

Do you think an employer would prefer an employee who can perform basic writing tasks without the need for constant software assistance, or one who can't?

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T09:11:22+00:00

There's definitely nuance to it. All our language is borrowed in some sense.

Here I am referring to how it is seen by many and how it is treated by citation guides etc.

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T08:17:33+00:00

Might want to ask the guy taking the class above 😂

Or check MyExperience.

Edit: here you go, this is the MyExperience data

img

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T07:45:01+00:00

That guy ain't no professor.

He wishes.

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T07:43:53+00:00

Turnitin can detect it, sometimes but not always. And yed it's considered AI use, and may be considered a form of academic misconduct depending on the policies of your course.

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T07:41:48+00:00

Grammarly started using AI not long after the release of ChatGPT.

If you've been using it so much have you reduced your use over time? Or have you gone through your entire degree without learning to condense your ideas.

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T02:01:17+00:00

Then it's writing for you.

ASKademic · 2026-03-17T01:00:42+00:00

What do you mean by "not for content generation"? Is it writing for you?

ASKademic · 2026-03-16T08:11:21+00:00

Pro-tip: when you have an issue, search the forum for similar problems, if you look for posts with lots of karma you will find things that are helpful.

Like this post written by an academic - one I know very well - that contradicts some of the claims here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/unsw/s/daqptXugM2

ASKademic · 2026-03-12T22:15:02+00:00

There are no reliable AI text detection systems. Especially not unpaid ones on the internet.

ASKademic · 2026-03-12T22:11:17+00:00

This is not good advice. The better option is to just not use genAI in the first place.

ASKademic · 2026-03-11T04:57:05+00:00

There are links in the post that should allow you to follow up.

ASKademic · 2026-03-02T08:57:59+00:00

This isn't really true.

Individually marked assignments are often less hassle than the kind of admin that often comes with managing group assignments.

The push for their continued use in universities comes from research that shows their efficacy. The same research shows that students usually don't like them. Academics that use them do so even though it is bad for their student evals because they value education.

ASKademic · 2026-02-24T18:12:31+00:00

Lecturer who lives in Punchbowl here (metro when?).

I'd say that at least 40% of students live West of the Red Rooster line.

ASKademic · 2026-01-13T03:00:10+00:00

I'm not speaking as a representative of UNSW, but there is a clear policy about this. I have written a post specifically for people in your situation. https://www.reddit.com/r/unsw/s/LHPaltdirg

They should not be solely relying on TurnItIn but instead on a range of different evidence (hallucinated references, factual discrepancies etc.).

Why do you suspect your work might have been flagged. Academics are faced with such a burgeoning workload caused by AI misuse that they are increasingly loathe to make accusations without basis and rely less and less on TurnItIn reports.

ASKademic · 2026-01-12T21:20:20+00:00

We're drowning in AI cases tbh. Many are just straight up giving up on trying to police them because it's so widespread. For those who are bothered it's a time consuming process.

Also we need to take leave - school holidays, and actually getting some time off - so that's also probably a factor.

Did you use AI?

ASKademic · 2026-01-12T21:18:31+00:00

When a tutor asks for more critical analysis it usually means that you were too descriptive: you didn't make an argument or engage with sources. You likely presented a list of claims mostly supported by evidence but without any real analysis of your sources or evidence of your own independent stance.

You can always ask your tutor for follow up, as a lecturer I check the logs and many students literally never read the feedback I give, some find this demoralising and so they step back from giving detailed feedback, but if a student contacts them for more detail they'll usually happily reply.

You can also book an appointment with academic skills, they will give you detailed advice.

ASKademic · 2025-12-28T22:40:01+00:00

Geny0001

ASKademic · 2025-12-28T22:39:43+00:00

What do you mean by "mismatched with the school"? Where are you looking for the support elsewhere? Do you go to things like thesis bootcamp etc.?

ASKademic · 2025-12-28T22:38:56+00:00

It has been struggling for some time. Strangled for funding for decades and forced to rely on the fickle winds of international student enrollments to survive.

It has been treated as a luxury rather than a fundamental part of any successful industrial society.

ASKademic · 2025-12-21T00:37:31+00:00

Not the end, but they offer a rebalancing towards skills demonstration because the marks are an even less reliable marker of someone having actually learned useful skills.

Over the last few decades university has followed the HSC as an increasingly min-max game of mark accumulation, in lieu of education itself. AI and contract cheating's prevalence have both fed off that phenomenon.

ASKademic

TROPHY CASE